Question Of Whether It’s Legal To Use Trademarks As Keywords Revived On Appeal in Rosetta Stone/Google Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit today revived part of Rosetta Stone’s trademark lawsuit against Google, meaning the search giant’s permitting the use of trademarked terms in AdWords is still legally questionable in the United States. It’s the first time an appellate court has ruled in a case of this kind.

Previously, a federal court in the Eastern District of Virginia issued a summary judgment in the case in 2010, essentially saying that the language software maker didn’t have a valid trademark infringement claim against Google. Rosetta Stone appealed.

The company had accused Google of trademark infringement, contributory and vicarious trademark infringement, trademark dilution and unjust enrichment — all related to Google allowing advertisers to use Rosetta Stone’s trademarks as either keywords or ad text in its AdWords program.

Though the appeals court affirmed the lower court’s decision with respect to the vicarious infringement and unjust enrichment claims, the judges said the direct infringement, contributory infringement and dilution claims need to be sent back to the Virginia court for further action.

In the direct infringement matter, the appellate court believes the lower court didn’t properly or fully consider some of the evidence, especially where a likelihood of confusion is concerned. Additionally, though the district court applied the “functionality doctrine” in the case, saying that Rosetta Stones trademarks became a part of the function of Google’s technology, the appeals court said the functionality doctrine doesn’t apply.

On the subject of contributory infringement, at issue is whether Google knew or should have known that people using its service were infringing on Rosetta Stone’s trademarks. The court of appeals said this question deserves a closer look, rather than a summary judgment.

Additionally, the court of appeals found that the lower court hadn’t properly applied the legal precedents with regard to trademark dilution, so that matter needs to be reconsidered.

Related Topics: Channel: SEM | Google: AdWords | Google: Legal | Legal: Trademarks

Sponsored


About The Author: is Executive Features Editor at Search Engine Land and Marketing Land. She’s a well-respected authority on digital marketing, having reported and written on the subject since 1998.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://twitter.com/RyanBurnsworth Ryan Burnsworth

    I can also understand not allowing advertisers to use the trademark terms in the ad copy. That could be used to defame the company directly without giving them a fair fight. However, disallowing advertisers to use trademark terms as keywords would be ridiculous.
    This helps fuel competition between online businesses. Rosetta Stone is just being whiny because they were losing sales to a cheaper/better product.

  • Pat Grady

    Next RS steps…
    +sue Trade Shows that allow competing booths signs to be visible to people walking by RS booth.
    +sue BestBuy for putting RS DVDs on same shelf as other language DVDs (BestBuy flyer in newspaper used the RS name).

  • http://sizzlingmagazine.com/ Magazine

    Great!! loved it

  • http://webdealswatch.com/ Ron Coachman

    I agree with Ryan. If it was down to Rosetta Stone et al, when ‘their keyword’ came up the page would be empty apart from their own listing.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide