<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reaction Towards Google&#8217;s New AdWords Promotion Formula Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/reaction-towards-googles-new-adwords-promotion-formula-change-11946/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/reaction-towards-googles-new-adwords-promotion-formula-change-11946</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:17:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Garry - PPC-Advice.com</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/reaction-towards-googles-new-adwords-promotion-formula-change-11946/comment-page-1#comment-3600</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry - PPC-Advice.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/reaction-towards-googles-new-adwords-promotion-formula-change-11946.php#comment-3600</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with JEHochman.  Google has and always will be the major contributor to all of my clients&#039; ROI.  In fact, I wouldn&#039;t overlook Yahoo in the equation, because more often than not, Yahoo brings in more ROI than adCenter ever could.

If you&#039;re looking at some of my compiled&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/08/09/impressions-of-summer-quantitative-search-share-analysis/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; traffic stats&lt;/a&gt;, Google is king (by far), Yahoo comes in a very distant second, and adCenter is all but irrelevant.

Garry
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with JEHochman.  Google has and always will be the major contributor to all of my clients&#8217; ROI.  In fact, I wouldn&#8217;t overlook Yahoo in the equation, because more often than not, Yahoo brings in more ROI than adCenter ever could.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking at some of my compiled<a href="http://www.ppc-advice.com/2007/08/09/impressions-of-summer-quantitative-search-share-analysis/" rel="nofollow"> traffic stats</a>, Google is king (by far), Yahoo comes in a very distant second, and adCenter is all but irrelevant.</p>
<p>Garry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEHochman</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/reaction-towards-googles-new-adwords-promotion-formula-change-11946/comment-page-1#comment-3599</link>
		<dc:creator>JEHochman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/reaction-towards-googles-new-adwords-promotion-formula-change-11946.php#comment-3599</guid>
		<description>Transparency at Google AdWords continues to dwindle.  I also like the way they eliminated hourly stats from Google Analytics so it&#039;s no longer useful for figuring out what day parts are less profitable.  To me, it seems that Google is using market power to increase profits.  This is a mistake because Microsoft is coming on strong, and once Google starts to slip, Microsoft may roll them.

I keep weekly stats for my clients across search engines, and I see Microsoft gaining share.  I see higher ROI with Microsoft than Google.  Changes like this one by Google are a bad idea.

For the record I don&#039;t like Microsoft software, but that won&#039;t prevent me from advertising with them if their network is cost effective.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transparency at Google AdWords continues to dwindle.  I also like the way they eliminated hourly stats from Google Analytics so it&#8217;s no longer useful for figuring out what day parts are less profitable.  To me, it seems that Google is using market power to increase profits.  This is a mistake because Microsoft is coming on strong, and once Google starts to slip, Microsoft may roll them.</p>
<p>I keep weekly stats for my clients across search engines, and I see Microsoft gaining share.  I see higher ROI with Microsoft than Google.  Changes like this one by Google are a bad idea.</p>
<p>For the record I don&#8217;t like Microsoft software, but that won&#8217;t prevent me from advertising with them if their network is cost effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
