Report: Bing Generates More Clicks Than Google

Chitika, a veritable fountain of data lately, has generated some new interesting findings from activity on its search-based advertising network. The company compared ad click behavior on Google and Bing and found that Bing generated about 50% more clicks:

Across the sample of nearly 15 million impressions used for this study, Google users clicked on ads at a rate of 1.09%, while Bing users clicked on ads 1.67% of the time.

However among the engines, Ask wins the prize for most clicks:

Ad Click by Search Engine - July 2010

These data are consistent with isolated earlier data that show more conversions coming from AOL and other engines vs. Google.

Chitika speculatively attributes the greater clicks on Bing to how the engine’s now defunct Cashback service conditioned users to respond to ads. I’m not sure I’d make that leap.

I asked Research Director Dan Ruby if there was any demographic information available on the differences in the audiences. He said there was not at this time.

Related Topics: Channel: SEM | Google: AdWords | Microsoft: Bing | Microsoft: Bing Ads | Stats: General | Stats: Search Behavior

Sponsored


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • CalebTMPDM

    Is it possible that the differences in clicks can simply be attributed to search relavency? The more relavent a search result, the fewer clicks would be needed to locate desired information, correct?

  • http://www.1boc.com lturec

    I have not dug into the data yet, so this may be covered there, however it seems that 1% of Google may still be worth significantly more than 3% of ASK based on the sheer volume of Google searches versus ASK searches. Knowing why Bing or ASK works better could be useful to getting more out of Google, but doesn’t the massive size of Google still indicate that you need to know how to play that game first? Am I missing something? It’s an interesting headline, but does it really change the strategy. If yes, how?

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide