<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Bing Generates More Clicks Than Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/report-bing-generates-more-clicks-than-google-47355/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/report-bing-generates-more-clicks-than-google-47355</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:39:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: lturec</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/report-bing-generates-more-clicks-than-google-47355/comment-page-1#comment-10733</link>
		<dc:creator>lturec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=47355#comment-10733</guid>
		<description>I have not dug into the data yet, so this may be covered there, however it seems that 1% of Google may still be worth significantly more than 3% of ASK based on the sheer volume of Google searches versus ASK searches. Knowing why Bing or ASK works better could be useful to getting more out of Google, but doesn&#039;t the massive size of Google still indicate that you need to know how to play that game first? Am I missing something? It&#039;s an interesting headline, but does it really change the strategy. If yes, how?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not dug into the data yet, so this may be covered there, however it seems that 1% of Google may still be worth significantly more than 3% of ASK based on the sheer volume of Google searches versus ASK searches. Knowing why Bing or ASK works better could be useful to getting more out of Google, but doesn&#8217;t the massive size of Google still indicate that you need to know how to play that game first? Am I missing something? It&#8217;s an interesting headline, but does it really change the strategy. If yes, how?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalebTMPDM</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/report-bing-generates-more-clicks-than-google-47355/comment-page-1#comment-10663</link>
		<dc:creator>CalebTMPDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/?p=47355#comment-10663</guid>
		<description>Is it possible that the differences in clicks can simply be attributed to search relavency? The more relavent a search result, the fewer clicks would be needed to locate desired information, correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible that the differences in clicks can simply be attributed to search relavency? The more relavent a search result, the fewer clicks would be needed to locate desired information, correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.243 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 11:13:49 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
