Reporting Multinational SEO Performance: Difficulties & Insights

Whether you report on just two or twenty different regions, getting a centralised report on search engine result page performance by region can be a headache if you don’t have an easy — and scalable — reporting system in place.

There are lots of ways to tackle the problem, but by far the easiest is via Google’s Webmaster Tools, now integrated into Google Analytics, which has the added advantage of being free, always a benefit to those working within tight budgets.

Interestingly, looking at alternatives to see what the paid competition offers results in very little opportunity. Truly multinational SEO tools are thin on the ground — and those that do offer multinational SEO reports as a feature invariably have a critical failing: they don’t search from the reporting country.

The majority simply try to replicate multinational SERPs by selecting the local TLD version of the search engine queried; an obvious failing for the likes of Google, which serves dramatically different SERPs to different IP locations.

Many other ranking tools hop onto a CDN to gather results, which can be effective for a limited set of countries, but falls over for any country without an exit node. Also, there’s an obvious problem with using CDNs or other cloud-based solutions (like Amazon’s EC2) — the exit IP ranges are well known; therefore provide poor IPs to get a neutral understanding of rankings for key phrases for search engine’s alert to scraping tools (the only way to naturally gather rankings).

Data warehousing also rears its head at this stage, as tools that gather rankings for different countries via their own network of IPs and allow paid access to them force you to depend on their set key phrases. There are none that offer full access to run any key phrase in any country you select and return a truly local, untarnished ranking.

This kind of report is very valuable, as regardless of personalisation, the underlying ranking report shows the true performance of a page for a target key phrase, increasing its ability to significantly become part of the personalised SERP.

These reports are also critical to gain competitive intelligence on performing URLs and domains for target sets of key phrase terms that can allow for a range of strategic activity to improve your own SEO efforts such as gap-led SEO linkbuilding.

Google-Centric Solutions & Insights

So, we return to Google’s reports, showing impressions and clicks for your performing key phrases. How can we make this effective for multinational campaigns?

In the past, we used to have to segment our Webmaster Tools Verification into multiple, different locations to gain country-specific data in the very useful Impressions Vs. Clicks data of the Search Queries report.

Google Webmaster Tools' Search Queries Report

Google Webmaster Tools’ Search Queries Report

Today, we only need that structure when geo-locating WMT accounts to specific countries (still important, though now also achievable using hreflang sitemaps), or if we have decided to use a multiple TLD approach to our international site architecture (something, I’d advise against).

That’s because Google has added the ability to segment the Search Queries report by country.

Google Search Queries Report's Location Options

Google Search Queries Report’s Location Options

The only drawbacks to this data are: we are restricted by domains we control (so, no glorious competitive intelligence to be had here); and also, we can’t see beyond Google, which is very important in many countries where Google’s market share is comparatively weak (not least the US!).

Those caveats aside, when we view the same data within Google Analytics, our ability to segment data beyond the SERP into goal tracking and e-commerce returns gives us a very flexible, multinational SERP performance analysis tool that can be scheduled to deliver convenient reports at whatever frequency we like, for whichever regions we determine.

Google Analytics Geographic Summary for Search Engine Optimisation Report

Google Analytics Geographic Summary for Search Engine Optimisation Report

Insights can quickly be derived for regions where SERP clickthrough has fallen dramatically, or overall impressions have dropped away. Critical region-specific landing pages can be identified quickly and scheduled for A/B testing should their conversion rates be sub-par, and so on.

With the lack of viable alternatives, Google’s Webmaster Tool Data is the best option out there for multinational webmasters, hindered only by a lack of competitive intelligence, which could be brought to bear for profitable competitor analysis.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Channel: Analytics | How To | How To: Analytics | Intermediate | Multinational Search

Sponsored


About The Author: has over twelve years web development experience & is the founder of QueryClick Search Marketing, a UK agency specialising in SEO, PPC and Conversion Rate Optimisation strategies that deliver industry-leading ROI.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://twitter.com/jimboot Jim Stewart

    Thanks nice article, The thing that is interesting when comparing your keywords in WMT to analytics is the https search strings. “Not provided” is fast becoming the main keyword referrer for a lot of webmasters. However Google is confusing as to how this is implemented in WMT. I tend to rely on its data though more than any other Google tool

  • http://twitter.com/victorpan victorpan

    I recently noticed the GWT changes – they’re really quite nice. Thanks for showing another form to use them – this makes a lot of sense if the international campaigns you’re targeting are also mainly using Google Search – not so much if you’re targeting Asia.

  • Frank Hohenleitner

    Hi Chris,

    I am not sure if I understood you correctly. You wrote: “Truly multinational SEO tools are thin on the ground — and those that do offer multinational SEO reports as a feature invariably have a critical failing: they don’t search from the reporting country”

    Did you check Searchmetrics? They show US ranking data coming from US IPs searching the US Index. So do other SEO Tools from Germany (Sistrix, SEOlytics etc.) They are definitely worth to be mentioned here as I do all my international reports using this softwares.

    Beside that: great article :)

    Cheers
    Frank

  • http://twitter.com/liversidge Chris Liversidge

    Hi Frank,

    The issue is that the tools often aren’t reporting from an IP within the target country. So, for example with Searchmetrics, rather than look at the country list, a more accurate idea of where the IP are comes from the cities list: those are the locations of their tool IPs.

    I can’t speak for Searchmetrics, but for most tools the rest of the locations are usually covered by CDNs or tweaking the search string to localise the country search engine (which is insufficient as I described in the article).

    Gathering results for the US or the UK – or indeed for many European countries or English language speaking countries – is relatively trivial: what I’m interested in is getting truly local results globally within a single tool: that’s the gap.

    For now, a blend of tools is usually required, or approaches like those I describe in the article. This will change very quickly in the future of course!

 

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide