<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return To The Search Engine Shoot-Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/return-to-the-search-engine-shoot-out-11125/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/return-to-the-search-engine-shoot-out-11125</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: websearchlady</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/return-to-the-search-engine-shoot-out-11125/comment-page-1#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator>websearchlady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 06:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/return-to-the-search-engine-shoot-out-11125.php#comment-2280</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Phil, I had come to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.websearchguide.ca/netblog/archives/006092.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;similar
conclusion&lt;/a&gt; about the shoot-out article. Several engines were missing - Exalead
as you mentioned. But the natural
language search engines, such as Hakia, were not covered. A more interesting study would be to test Hakia against Google and Yahoo.

I also thought there were odd groupings. I wouldn&#039;t have placed the Congoo web search with make-and-share services of Rollyo and Prefound.

Lastly, I would not have included Altavista or Alltheweb in the shootout at all. They almost always return the same results as Yahoo and it&#039;s a puzzle to understand how either could score better than Yahoo in any test - and certainly not the very plain and now featureless Altavista. Speaking of which, I enjoyed your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philb.com/whichengine.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Which-search-engine-when&lt;/a&gt; page but I&#039;m surprised that you too favour Altavista. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, I had come to a <a href="http://www.websearchguide.ca/netblog/archives/006092.html" rel="nofollow">similar<br />
conclusion</a> about the shoot-out article. Several engines were missing &#8211; Exalead<br />
as you mentioned. But the natural<br />
language search engines, such as Hakia, were not covered. A more interesting study would be to test Hakia against Google and Yahoo.</p>
<p>I also thought there were odd groupings. I wouldn&#8217;t have placed the Congoo web search with make-and-share services of Rollyo and Prefound.</p>
<p>Lastly, I would not have included Altavista or Alltheweb in the shootout at all. They almost always return the same results as Yahoo and it&#8217;s a puzzle to understand how either could score better than Yahoo in any test &#8211; and certainly not the very plain and now featureless Altavista. Speaking of which, I enjoyed your <a href="http://www.philb.com/whichengine.htm" rel="nofollow">Which-search-engine-when</a> page but I&#8217;m surprised that you too favour Altavista. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
