<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine Land: Top Stories &amp; Stats, Jan. 10, 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/search-engine-land-top-stories-stats-jan-10-2007-10238/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/search-engine-land-top-stories-stats-jan-10-2007-10238</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:37:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AndyBeard</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/search-engine-land-top-stories-stats-jan-10-2007-10238/comment-page-1#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyBeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/search-engine-land-top-stories-stats-jan-10-2007-10238.php#comment-562</guid>
		<description>You are running MyBlogLog on the site and their stats are live as well. They also provide clickable links.

One thing I would like is for them to provide a list sorted by most recent activity, but you can certainly spot traffic coming in as it happens for any larger spike.

The Pro service isn&#039;t that expensive for what it give you, and we all know running an analytics service is a heavy drain on servers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are running MyBlogLog on the site and their stats are live as well. They also provide clickable links.</p>
<p>One thing I would like is for them to provide a list sorted by most recent activity, but you can certainly spot traffic coming in as it happens for any larger spike.</p>
<p>The Pro service isn&#8217;t that expensive for what it give you, and we all know running an analytics service is a heavy drain on servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ★ ★  SearcH EngineS WeB  ★ ★</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/search-engine-land-top-stories-stats-jan-10-2007-10238/comment-page-1#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>★ ★  SearcH EngineS WeB  ★ ★</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/search-engine-land-top-stories-stats-jan-10-2007-10238.php#comment-561</guid>
		<description>These stats are  impressive, and illustrate how versatile Social sites have changed the landscape of the traditional dependancy on Search Engines. :-)


It is a good idea to show the stats daily - both the good days,the bad and the mediocre.
This is  a learning experience, so all information is quality information.


But, one major flaw with the stats packages referenced, is they do NOT show the &lt;b&gt;TIME &lt;/b&gt; a particular visitor spent on that landing page nor the &lt;b&gt;OUTCLICKS&lt;/b&gt;.

Sitemeter DOES do this, which is why it is an alternative worth sharing for true transparancy.

Analyzing the time and the overall &#039;average&#039; time spent, illustrates how entertaining the topics were - and the OUTCLICKS illustrate whether they were intrigued to explore other pages, or if they did a cursory glance and clicked the back button to go back.


&lt;i&gt; (sometimes getting many replies can be a hint, but usually the piece has to be controversial)&lt;/i&gt;


Also, it would be intriguing to find out what percentages are returning visitors.





</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These stats are  impressive, and illustrate how versatile Social sites have changed the landscape of the traditional dependancy on Search Engines. :-)</p>
<p>It is a good idea to show the stats daily &#8211; both the good days,the bad and the mediocre.<br />
This is  a learning experience, so all information is quality information.</p>
<p>But, one major flaw with the stats packages referenced, is they do NOT show the <b>TIME </b> a particular visitor spent on that landing page nor the <b>OUTCLICKS</b>.</p>
<p>Sitemeter DOES do this, which is why it is an alternative worth sharing for true transparancy.</p>
<p>Analyzing the time and the overall &#8216;average&#8217; time spent, illustrates how entertaining the topics were &#8211; and the OUTCLICKS illustrate whether they were intrigued to explore other pages, or if they did a cursory glance and clicked the back button to go back.</p>
<p><i> (sometimes getting many replies can be a hint, but usually the piece has to be controversial)</i></p>
<p>Also, it would be intriguing to find out what percentages are returning visitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
