Semantic & Graph-Based Search: The Future Face Of Search

In a June 2010 Semantic Web Meetup in San Diego, Peter Mika of Yahoo!’s research division gave a presentation entitled, “The future face of Search is Semantic for Facebook, Google and Yahoo!” As the title suggests, the presentation focused on the ever-growing use of semantic markup as a means for helping computers parse and understand content.

The talk focused on what was then the current state of the Semantic Web, as well as upcoming formats/technologies in development and the research being done in the field of semantic search.

The idea that the Semantic Web would be central to search within just a few years was met with some skepticism at the time — back then, all most folks were tracking was the adoption of Semantic Web technologies and semantic search using primarily RDFa, embedded metadata, or semantic markup.

Search Becomes Semantic & Graph-Based

The prediction that search would become increasingly semantic and graph-based has certainly proven to be more than true. Not only have the search engines since adopted schema.org as a standard along with microdata as a syntax (Facebook RDFa and Open Graph are examples), but things are now elevated to the next level in this process of adoption.

Graph Search on consumed/verified/validated information, which is a core component of the Semantic Web, is now considered key for the future of search in both search and social engines.

Future Face Search

Linking Open Data cloud diagram, by Richard Cyganiak and Anja Jentzsch.

Google Knowledge Graph

Google originally started their rich snippets program in 2009 and finally announced their Knowledge Graph just a couple of days before Facebook’s IPO in 2012. For their “rich snippets,” Google initially utilized their own ontology/vocabulary, then switched to schema.org standards along with the three other major search engines (now four, as Yandex recently joined the mix).

Google’s Knowledge Graph is effectively using their version of graph search; however, it is largely focused on information and facts rather than searcher interests and social interactions. While there are some social signals provided via Google+, Knowledge Graph search is primarily based on Wikipedia-type information and other related/verified sources.

Excitingly, this is constantly being extended. (Those of you interested in further details and additional information may want to check out wikidata.)

Search Is Fast Moving

As an example of the incredible pace at which the industry moves, look at image recognition. Image recognition was a research problem in the 1990s. Several years ago, facial recognition made its way into everyday applications like i-photo, Facebook, Picasa and even your camera. Computer vision techniques are now being applied all over the Web — especially in retail to find “visually similar” items (e.g., Google Shopping and Amazon).

Google Play also now leverages facial recognition to enhance its Knowledge Graph capabilities. It’s pretty remarkable, but we are only seeing the beginning. 

Jack Black

The reality is that intelligent systems are driving e-commerce and sales. We now live in an era where forward deployed inventory calendars can leverage predictive stocking, making same-day delivery of online purchases possible. Technologies like graph search, graph analytics, predictive analytics and big data are par for the course, being leveraged under the hood every time a user makes a purchase online. Google itself is a master at these technologies.

Bing Tiles

Clearly, the other search engines have adopted similar data tracking techniques and are working to leverage them as well. Bing “tiles” are their version of rich snippets; their version of the knowledge graph, or graph search, is probably Bing snapshots. (Feel free to read more on Microsoft’s graph-based repository, Satori.)

From what I can garner looking at this in the context of Bing Tags, they are taking a more social approach to Semantic and graph-based search (presumably in line with their relationships with social media sites like Facebook, LinkedIn, etc), even going so far as to allow users to control their appearance in SERPs to some extent. Bing clearly needs this strongly differentiated angle to help increase its share of the search market.Customize How You Look On bing

Facebook Graph Search

Finally, enter Facebook Graph Search, which utilizes Facebook’s wealth of easily filterable user data to provide searchers with results that are tailored specifically for them. As my colleague, Gerald Burnand, writes in his piece about Facebook’s Graph Search, there are numerous possibilities for how this filtered data might be used.

Recruiters might look to Facebook to narrow down potential candidates by industry (although it has a long way to go if it wants to compete with LinkedIn). Similarly, Facebook marketers could use Graph Search to learn more about common Likes/interests among their fans, making it easy to create highly-targeted micro campaigns aimed at relevant demographics. 

Understanding & Using Search Data

Today, even the end consumer has access to these resources in the form of their mobile phones, tablets and computers. Remember, every time a consumer picks up a mobile device, uses an app, or performs a search, those devices are essentially acting as sensors, tracking search queries, geolocations, and many other consumer behaviors — all of which ultimately turn into information to be used to increase conversions.

Google’s status as a market leader in search grants them access to copious amounts of invaluable user data and product information. This information — obtaining it, understanding it and applying it — is the key to their success.

There is clearly a race among these companies to better aggregate and understand huge amounts of data. The Semantic Web has come far since 2010, but improvements and new technologies are continuously being developed. What new developments do you see on the horizon?

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Facebook: Facebook Search | Google: Knowledge Graph | Google: Rich Snippets | Google: Web History & Search History | Google: Web Search | Schema.org | Search & Retail

Sponsored


About The Author: of SemanticFuse is a semantic strategist and software engineer. providing semantic SEO and other related consulting services. Starr is a technology expert and software designer specifically in the semantic search and semantic Web arenas.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.noggindigital.com/ Zach Kasperski

    Really great post on where search is going, especially since you give a nice landscape view of multiple networks that collect valuable data. To add to your piece on Google’s Knowledge Graph, they’ve really stepped up content relevancy and authority with Author Rank in their search results. This is typically seen as rich snippets with the Google+ information associated with the author of an article.

    We still hear people in the industry hate on Google+, labeling the social network as a “flop” that failed miserably. Let it be known that Google+ is not something to devalue in inbound marketing. Copyblogger even states that, “What’s been dubbed as ‘author rank’ has the potential to be the biggest algorithmic signal for SEO since the hyperlink itself.” Simply put, you should be sharing your content across all social channels.

    Again – thanks for your post, Barbara!

  • SwagScent.com

    Yo, check out this site for perfume and cosmetics. Good stuff: http://www.swagscent.com

  • Lidor Bar

    I really like this post on search engines and the future of those.

    I think that search become so accessible and easy, especially in google.

    But, there is still a lack in advanced search in sites. I am talking on search in e- commerce.

    To understand it more, go to Amazon or ebay and try to use the advanced search. It is too difficult and harm the user experience.

    Latley, I met some young entrepreneurs that working on a new search engine. They put the attention on the user experience. They are called bloompa or blompa.

    Will be interesting to see if it will effect on the other search engines.

    Thank you Barbara for an intresting article!

 

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide