Let’s play a game to illustrate some not-so-silly linking strategies. Imagine you just launched a new web site devoted to breeding chipmunks. If I gave you a choice of the following three sets of inbound links, and I told you you could have one set and only one set, which set of links would you want pointing at your new chipmunk breeding site, and why?

Set one

http://web.ncf.ca/dg300/links.html

http://www.zoomschool.com/subjects/mammals/rodent/Chipmunkprintout.shtml

http://www.maaoravat.com/Maaoravat/links_eng.html

http://www.fishbc.com/adventure/wilderness/animals/chipmunk.htm

http://www.starpulse.com/Television/Alvin_and_the_Chipmunks/Links/

http://www.eagle.ca/~diane/index21.html

Set two

http://www.angelfire.com/ca/albrit/

http://www.chipmunk.cwc.net/links.html

http://danielwright.wikispaces.com/page/links/Chipmunk

http://web.ncf.ca/dg300/links.html

http://www.wildlifesearch.com/chipmunk.htm

http://www.pestproducts.com/chipmunks.htm

http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/nreos/wild/wildlife/animals/mammals/chipmunks.htm

Set three

http://www.animaltrek.com/mammals/chipmunk.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chipmunk

http://www.britishcolumbia.com/Wildlife/wildlife/landmammals/cw/cw_chipmunk.html

http://www.aftagley.com/chipmunk_links.html

http://www.animal-protection.org/tierhaltung/welchestier/sh.html

http://www.technorati.com/tag/chipmunk

Each set of links offers something different than they others, and each set of links would be appropriate and 100% on-topic. So which set of links would be better? set one has several high rankers at Google, but set two has that sweet .edu and some high rankers at both Google and Yahoo. Then again, set three offers you a Wikipedia link and a Technorati tag link.

It’s not as easy as it might seem. You could argue for each set depending on what you value. Search rank? Click traffic? Trust over time? What set of links is more likely to help you not just today, but tomorrow? What if I said your new chipmunk site is an ecommerce site that sells chipmunk posters and calendars? What if I said your new chipmunk site sells pest removal traps and cages? Would that distinction change the links you desire? Do tools like this help you decide? There’s many ways to skin this cat, or, um, breed this chipmunk…

So take one more look, and remember, the set of links you choose will be the only links you can have. Forever.

Which set do you want, and why? Tell us in the comments section below.

Eric Ward has been in the link building and content publicity game since 1994, providing services ranking from linking strategy to a monthly private newsletters on linking for subscribers. The Link Week column appears on Mondays at Search Engine Land.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Link Building: General | Link Week


About The Author: has been creating linking strategies for clients since 1994. Eric publishes the strategic linking advice newsletter LinkMoses Private, and serves as the Link Evangelist for advertising intelligence firm AdGooroo. He provides linking services, training and consulting via EricWard.com


SMX - Search Marketing Expo

Sign Up To Receive This Column Via Email:

Name: Company: Email:

Like This Story? Please Share!

Other ways to share:

Like Our Site? Follow Us!

Search Engine Land on Google+

LinkedIn over 34,000 members
Subscribe to Our Feed! 80,520 subscribers take our RSS feed

Comments

4 Comments on Show Your Linking Acumen With Chipmunks

squareoak,

I’ll take set three with the Wiki link. Although this link won’t help me rank, the traffic will be substantial. I don’t see the search engines (you know who you are!) devaluing Wikipedia anytime soon. Wikipedia has rank, authority, and trust that for the time being, is extending beyond technorati, or .edu domains.



squareoak,

I’ll take set three with the Wiki link. Although this link won’t help me rank, the traffic will be substantial. I don’t see the search engines (you know who you are!) devaluing Wikipedia anytime soon. Wikipedia has rank, authority, and trust that for the time being, is extending beyond technorati, or .edu domains.



Paul Pedersen,

Set #3!!

Wikipedia is nice …but more importantly, all of these links are from sites/pages that are more related to my topic. In addition, they are information resources and have substance …which, supposedly, is what my site is supposed to be.

I’ll take a link from a good quality neighborhood then a link from a .edu any day.

You are known by your friends:
Set #1 is shallow,
Set #2 is slutty, and
Set #3 is a classy , well educated fellow.



ryanol,

Group one is definitely bad neighborhoods, one that starpulse page is pure webspam and two its got a canuck site.

Group two is also in need of some gentrification and its not all that relevant….and still we can’t shake that damn canadian site.

Group Three is my clear winner here

***no actual canadians were harmed in the production of this comment



 

Get Our News, Everywhere!

 
  • Advertise With Us
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at an upcoming SMX event:

Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.

SMX Site » | SMX Difference » | SMX News »


Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Ranking Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide