States Threaten Action If Google Doesn’t Delist “Illegal Sites”

Google legalAccording to the Washington Post, 24 state attorneys general are trying to pressure Google to discontinue ads and the indexing of sites they argue teach or enable criminal activity.

In particular, they continue to pressure Google to eliminate advertising connected to the sale of illegal or fake prescription drugs.

The attorneys generals’ complaints were initially aired in a December 2013 letter to Google General Counsel Kent Walker and then a follow-up letter sent in February 2014. The December letter lists the following complaints and concerns:

These issues include: (1) Google’s monetization of dangerous and illegal content; (2) the prevalence of content constituting intellectual property violations and ease with which such content is shared and trafficked over Google’s systems; (3) the promotion of illegal and prescription-free drugs; and (4) the facilitation of payments to and by purveyors of all of the aforementioned content through Google’s payment services.

In 2011, Google admitted liability and turned over roughly $500 million in profits and paid fees tied to accepting ads from Canadian pharmacies targeting US residents. This was part of a deal that also prevented criminal prosecution of Google CEO Larry Page. The US Attorney in charge of the probe, Peter Neronha, said that Page was personally aware of what was going on with the Canadian ads as well as the fact that the ads were illegal.

According to the Washington Post, Google has committed to hiring 120 people to flag “rogue ads and videos.” It is also apparently eliminating more than 1,000 questionable search suggestions  (e.g., “how to get away with robbing a house,” “how to buy slaves,” “how to become a drug dealer”) that lead people to websites promoting illegal activity.

The article goes on to say that steps like these have not entirely satisfied some of the attorneys general, who want Google to do much more and de-index sites tied to potential criminal activity. If Google fails to comply they say they may take legal action against the company.

Google has countered that the attorneys general want it to get into policing or censoring content, which it has declined to do.

Related Topics: Channel: Industry | Google: AdWords | Google: Legal | Legal: Censorship | Legal: General


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.

Comments are closed.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide