<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That 25% New Queries Figure? Ballpark Estimate, Says Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/that-25-new-queries-figure-ballpark-estimate-says-google-11596/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/that-25-new-queries-figure-ballpark-estimate-says-google-11596</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:22:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/that-25-new-queries-figure-ballpark-estimate-says-google-11596/comment-page-1#comment-3092</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/that-25-new-queries-figure-ballpark-estimate-says-google-11596.php#comment-3092</guid>
		<description>It seemed a very reasonable estimate to me.  When I compare my search referral queries to old data I see a tremendous shift in topic over time.  A lot of that traffic still goes to the same sections, but people are using different queries to find the older content.

New content, of course, still focuses on what is current and interesting.  But I think the 20-25% shift per month is about right and many large site Webmasters who analyze their referral data on a regular basis would probably agree there are shifts in query trends.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seemed a very reasonable estimate to me.  When I compare my search referral queries to old data I see a tremendous shift in topic over time.  A lot of that traffic still goes to the same sections, but people are using different queries to find the older content.</p>
<p>New content, of course, still focuses on what is current and interesting.  But I think the 20-25% shift per month is about right and many large site Webmasters who analyze their referral data on a regular basis would probably agree there are shifts in query trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
