<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case Of The Missing White House Cached Page On Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/the-case-of-the-missing-white-house-cached-page-on-google-11013/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/the-case-of-the-missing-white-house-cached-page-on-google-11013</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:10:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/the-case-of-the-missing-white-house-cached-page-on-google-11013/comment-page-1#comment-2015</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/the-case-of-the-missing-white-house-cached-page-on-google-11013.php#comment-2015</guid>
		<description>Special thanks to Vanessa Fox and Evan Roseman for digging into this. Danny, you&#039;re correct that the url removal tool has nothing to do with this and you&#039;re correct that it&#039;s occurring for some documents that we are refreshing very quickly. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s that hard to show the cached links, but I&#039;m not sure of the timeframe (e.g. few days vs. a few weeks).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Special thanks to Vanessa Fox and Evan Roseman for digging into this. Danny, you&#8217;re correct that the url removal tool has nothing to do with this and you&#8217;re correct that it&#8217;s occurring for some documents that we are refreshing very quickly. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that hard to show the cached links, but I&#8217;m not sure of the timeframe (e.g. few days vs. a few weeks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feedthebot</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/the-case-of-the-missing-white-house-cached-page-on-google-11013/comment-page-1#comment-2014</link>
		<dc:creator>feedthebot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/the-case-of-the-missing-white-house-cached-page-on-google-11013.php#comment-2014</guid>
		<description>TeeHee,

You have discovered something very interesting, I have a theory on this and I was wondering if Google has said anything at all else about missing cached pages (other than it is a bug and they are aware of it)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TeeHee,</p>
<p>You have discovered something very interesting, I have a theory on this and I was wondering if Google has said anything at all else about missing cached pages (other than it is a bug and they are aware of it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
