Head-To-Head: Bing’s Social Search Vs. Google’s Search Plus Your World

Earlier this year, Google made its results more social with Search Plus Your World. Now Bing has reshaped how it handles social information as part of its “The New Bing” launch. Which does better, Google’s blended search+search model or Bing’s more segregated approach. Let’s look at some examples.

Hey Google, How’s New Girl?

I thought I’d start with a search for New Girl. It’s a great show. I should know. I was a Fan of the Week. What’s Google show me?

The arrows point at things that have come because of social connections, and I’m only going to focus on these things, in this head-to-head. Do these additions seem to help or hurt my results?

Google tells me at the top that someone I know has +1′d the official site. Maybe that calls my attention to it more, but I could take it or leave it.

Further down, my own post on Google+ about being made Fan of the Week appears. I say point to Google. Ego searches are one of the key ways people historically judge search engine relevancy. Can they find your own stuff? Google could.

Further down, the official New Girl Facebook page is listed. It only shows up this high because I’m “friends” with New Girl on Google+. Content that your friends like moves higher. If I turn off the personalization that Search Plus Your World does, that link drops from the top results.

Finally, to the right side is information from the New Girl page on Google+. This is nice to see, helpful.

New Girl On Bing

Over on Bing, there’s less going on. The IMDB listing has a thumbs-up, to alert me that one or more of my friends likes it. I like this a little better than Google flagging pictures. It feels cleaner, less intrusive.

Further down on the page, I’ve shown one of two different links that appear with a trending arrow, to alert me they are currently being frequently shared on Twitter. Again, kind of nice, though also kind of confusing when there’s also a news box.

Bing really falls down in the Sidebar are, where it should really shine. I follow the Facebook New Girl page, but that’s not shown. I do get the Twitter account of Zooey Deschanel, the main character of the series. But why not show me at least the Twitter account for the New Girl show itself?

In the end, I think Google comes out ahead on social integration, in this case.

Google & Penguin

If you’re in the search marketing space, Penguin recently changed from being one of those cute flightless birds to the name of a new Google update aimed at web spam. This seemed a perfect test for the new social features. What would a search for Penguin yield?

Mixed among the regular results, Google gave me three based on my social connections. The top was something I myself had just shared on Google+, a new article I published about Penguin. OK, relevant, but not that helpful. I know I published the article. And really, what I’d rather have is a link to the actual article instead of a link to my post about the article.

After that, more Google+ — this time a post from my news editor Barry Schwartz, sharing a video related to Penguin. Lastly, an article I wrote on Marketing Land.

Overall, these things make sense to appear, but some more variety, some posts on Penguin from others in my social network, those might have been more helfpul.

Bing & Penguin

Next up, Bing:

The Sidebar on this particular query is pretty useless. It’s mostly people who have pictures of penguins. Apparently, none of my Facebook friends have shared or posted anything to do with the Penguin Update.

Over in the main search results, impressive success. Because I and another person have liked my original article on the Penguin Update, it ranks tops in my personalized results.

I call this test about even. I felt Google didn’t give me much variety, but neither did Bing.

X-Games

One of my son’s is big on BMX, so I tried a search for X-Games as a final test. Here’s are the social results I got back, Google on the left, Bing on the right:

Nothing dramatic, really. Wow, I get my own pictures on Google. Might be useful, but since I know X Games itself on Google+, why not at least suggest that? Meanwhile on Bing, I can see that several of my friends like X Games on Facebook, but why not list the page itself?

Social Is Still Developing

In theory, social mixed with search sounds great. In reality, it’s still has a long way to go. For some background on some of the challenges, I really urge you to see my post from earlier this year, When Everyone Gets The Vote: Social Shares As The New Link Building.

Related Articles

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Features: Analysis | Google: Search Plus Your World | Google: Social Search | Microsoft: Bing | Microsoft: Bing Social Search

Sponsored


About The Author: is a Founding Editor of Search Engine Land. He’s a widely cited authority on search engines and search marketing issues who has covered the space since 1996. Danny also serves as Chief Content Officer for Third Door Media, which publishes Search Engine Land and produces the SMX: Search Marketing Expo conference series. He has a personal blog called Daggle (and keeps his disclosures page there). He can be found on Facebook, Google + and microblogs on Twitter as @dannysullivan.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • William Margita

    GOOGLE is AMAZON

    Out of 12 GOOGLE “board of directors”
    3 are formerly affiliated with AMAZON.

    L. John Doerr: previously a director of Amazon.com

    Ann Mather: previously Zappos.com which was aquired by Amazon.com in 2009

    K. Ram Shriram: served as Vice President of Business Development at Amazon.comIT IS OVER!

    On April 24th 2012  GOOGLE, which accounts for almost 70% of all online search, released the PENGUIN update.
    While they say it was a “webspam” update it was really the change that exposes their relationship with AMAZON and now sends all PORN and PRODUCT searches to AMAZON and it’s subsudiaries to include the IMDB.com and Zappos.

    Not only does AMAZON control the #1 ranking on GOOGLE for “books”, it is #1 for almost every english word from “jewelry boxes” to “XXX” and “sex toys”.

    What Does This Mean?

    GOOGLE and AMAZON have cleverly manipulated you, the average person, into a direct buying path for basically every product in the world killing off their competition. Google controls 70% of all search online which now means AMAZON controls 70% of all online purchases. THAT’ IS ALOT OF MONEY!

  • fuyao

    Google is the new face of social fornication. A devil in disguise – media manipulation and the socialist illuminati…

  • http://www.facebook.com/alainkinwong Alain Wong

     Great article comparing Google and Bing. Here’s a response video comparing Wajam’s social search offering and the new Bing design: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zV_LpzIOkI

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/RMCP2XWWMFWHVYTD5W66OQYJP4 Harold

    =>    I’m neither a Google muppet-groupie nor a Microsoft fan;  however, it is VERY OBVIOUS and APPARENT for all to clearly see that… —–  while (socially obtuse) GOOGLE Corporation arrogantly, clumsily and sloppily tried to COERCIVELY force “SEARCH PLUS YOUR WORLD” down our throats and also POLLUTE their main search results, making those search results LESS RELEVANT & LESS USEFUL (by the way, Google is sneering at YOU peons/serfs: “SPYW = SPY-ware, SPY-world),  
    —  instead Microsoft has *surprisingly & admirably) shown a thoughtful, insightful approach to designing & displaying their supplemental “SOCIAL search results” (which emanate from a more comprehensive range of sources than Google); Bing’s supplemental “SOCIAL search results” info. is displayed via well-organized & neatly convenient SIDEBAR channels that are optional & readily (easily) accessible via cute user-friendly icons (win-win !) — Microsoft is actually demonstrating social awareness & Respect for consumers & product users !
    =================

  • http://www.facebook.com/malikisyours Malik Umar Farooq Awan

    wow,,,such a nice comparison.
    thanks dude.

  • http://www.facebook.com/malikisyours Malik Umar Farooq Awan

    wow,,,such a nice comparison.
    thanks dude.

  • http://www.facebook.com/malikisyours Malik Umar Farooq Awan
  • http://www.facebook.com/malikisyours Malik Umar Farooq Awan
  • http://xtremeno.smart-reviews.com/ Xtremeno

    Google search + is a revolutionary in WEB2.0. IT is going to pay the way for new kind of hidden market very soon people are going to make money out of it.

  • http://twitter.com/sabrebIade Sabre

    Google is slowly destroying themselves in search.
    After many years, I have switched to Bing and am finding stuff not only easier, but things I have never seen on Google. 

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide