<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Google Search Terms Of 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/top-google-search-terms-of-2006-10082/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/top-google-search-terms-of-2006-10082</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:49:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/top-google-search-terms-of-2006-10082/comment-page-1#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/top-google-search-terms-of-2006-10082.php#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Anyone else find Google&#039;s top 10 searches for 2006 a little strange; or at least different as compared with Yahoo and MSN?

Yahoo and MSN both have Pamela Anderson, Britney Spears, and Paris Hilton in their top 10 searches. Google doesn&#039;t have any of these ladies?!

Can we say that Googles users are a little more highbrow than that of Yahoo and MSN?

And hats off to Pam Anderson. Did she do anything in 2006? Yet, still in the top 10!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else find Google&#8217;s top 10 searches for 2006 a little strange; or at least different as compared with Yahoo and MSN?</p>
<p>Yahoo and MSN both have Pamela Anderson, Britney Spears, and Paris Hilton in their top 10 searches. Google doesn&#8217;t have any of these ladies?!</p>
<p>Can we say that Googles users are a little more highbrow than that of Yahoo and MSN?</p>
<p>And hats off to Pam Anderson. Did she do anything in 2006? Yet, still in the top 10!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarasez</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/top-google-search-terms-of-2006-10082/comment-page-1#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>sarasez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/top-google-search-terms-of-2006-10082.php#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Interesting to note that under Current Events, the politician tracking chart is based on a misspelling of Hillary Clinton (&quot;Hilary Clinton&quot;). Intentional? Not?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to note that under Current Events, the politician tracking chart is based on a misspelling of Hillary Clinton (&#8221;Hilary Clinton&#8221;). Intentional? Not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
