<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Travelocity: Non-Branded Terms Convert Nearly 25% But &#8220;Assists&#8221; Might Be Less Than Assumed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/travelocity-non-branded-terms-convert-nearly-25-but-assists-might-be-less-than-assumed-10809/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/travelocity-non-branded-terms-convert-nearly-25-but-assists-might-be-less-than-assumed-10809</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:24:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DanielR</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/travelocity-non-branded-terms-convert-nearly-25-but-assists-might-be-less-than-assumed-10809/comment-page-1#comment-1666</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/travelocity-non-branded-terms-convert-nearly-25-but-assists-might-be-less-than-assumed-10809.php#comment-1666</guid>
		<description>Danny, like Jonathan said - great follow-up!

And to Jeffrey Glueck, I really appreciate you taking the time to follow-up and clarify.

Thanks!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny, like Jonathan said &#8211; great follow-up!</p>
<p>And to Jeffrey Glueck, I really appreciate you taking the time to follow-up and clarify.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AussieWebmaster</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/travelocity-non-branded-terms-convert-nearly-25-but-assists-might-be-less-than-assumed-10809/comment-page-1#comment-1665</link>
		<dc:creator>AussieWebmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/travelocity-non-branded-terms-convert-nearly-25-but-assists-might-be-less-than-assumed-10809.php#comment-1665</guid>
		<description>Very thorough report mate. Thanks for doing the research.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very thorough report mate. Thanks for doing the research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Mendez</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/travelocity-non-branded-terms-convert-nearly-25-but-assists-might-be-less-than-assumed-10809/comment-page-1#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Mendez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/travelocity-non-branded-terms-convert-nearly-25-but-assists-might-be-less-than-assumed-10809.php#comment-1664</guid>
		<description>Great follow-up Danny. Thanks!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great follow-up Danny. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Greitzer</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/travelocity-non-branded-terms-convert-nearly-25-but-assists-might-be-less-than-assumed-10809/comment-page-1#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Greitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/travelocity-non-branded-terms-convert-nearly-25-but-assists-might-be-less-than-assumed-10809.php#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>Great follow-up.  Jeff, thanks for responding to my comment and for the overall clarification.  To your comment,  &quot;we weren&#039;t saying search wasn&#039;t measurable. We&#039;re saying advertisers should get more sophisticated and accurate about how they measure it,&quot; I&#039;m in complete agreement.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great follow-up.  Jeff, thanks for responding to my comment and for the overall clarification.  To your comment,  &#8220;we weren&#8217;t saying search wasn&#8217;t measurable. We&#8217;re saying advertisers should get more sophisticated and accurate about how they measure it,&#8221; I&#8217;m in complete agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
