<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Local Search: Yell Ad Campaign, welovelocal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/uk-local-search-yell-ad-campaign-welovelocal-11398/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/uk-local-search-yell-ad-campaign-welovelocal-11398</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:49:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr C</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/uk-local-search-yell-ad-campaign-welovelocal-11398/comment-page-1#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/uk-local-search-yell-ad-campaign-welovelocal-11398.php#comment-2755</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, but I would like to point out to RobN that touchlocal.com is not even close to ThomsonLocal.com on traffic, let alone overtaken it.

I would agree that welovelocal.com does appear to be a beta site though
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, but I would like to point out to RobN that touchlocal.com is not even close to ThomsonLocal.com on traffic, let alone overtaken it.</p>
<p>I would agree that welovelocal.com does appear to be a beta site though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/uk-local-search-yell-ad-campaign-welovelocal-11398/comment-page-1#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/uk-local-search-yell-ad-campaign-welovelocal-11398.php#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>There is clearly similarities between us and touch local, however our feature set is far broader than theirs particularly with respect to our social functions.

Rather than being able to simply review, our users are able to connect with friends, maintain a profile, and see the reviews that their friends have written.  Furthermore we have adopted a number of high technologies such as OpenID and microformats, and have already integrated our service into the Facebook platform.

As for our reviews, well, we only launched 4 days ago, and our staff seem to have caught a reviewing bug.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is clearly similarities between us and touch local, however our feature set is far broader than theirs particularly with respect to our social functions.</p>
<p>Rather than being able to simply review, our users are able to connect with friends, maintain a profile, and see the reviews that their friends have written.  Furthermore we have adopted a number of high technologies such as OpenID and microformats, and have already integrated our service into the Facebook platform.</p>
<p>As for our reviews, well, we only launched 4 days ago, and our staff seem to have caught a reviewing bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobN</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/uk-local-search-yell-ad-campaign-welovelocal-11398/comment-page-1#comment-2753</link>
		<dc:creator>RobN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/uk-local-search-yell-ad-campaign-welovelocal-11398.php#comment-2753</guid>
		<description>welovelocal.com looks like an interesting idea, although it does seem to mimicking the already established touchlocal.com, which has been around for a couple of years, and has already overtaken Thomson as the number two player in traffic terms to Yell.com. Having had a good rootle around the welovelocal.com, it would also appear to be populated pretty much entirely by their own staff, which suggests that this more of beta site than a live one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>welovelocal.com looks like an interesting idea, although it does seem to mimicking the already established touchlocal.com, which has been around for a couple of years, and has already overtaken Thomson as the number two player in traffic terms to Yell.com. Having had a good rootle around the welovelocal.com, it would also appear to be populated pretty much entirely by their own staff, which suggests that this more of beta site than a live one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
