<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Up Close &amp; Personal With Robots.txt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/up-close-personal-with-robotstxt-10978/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/up-close-personal-with-robotstxt-10978</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:49:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IncrediBILL</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/up-close-personal-with-robotstxt-10978/comment-page-1#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>IncrediBILL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/up-close-personal-with-robotstxt-10978.php#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>Both sitemaps and robots.txt are scraping vulnerabilities, I&#039;ve seen it happen, so I&#039;m a big fan of the authenticated crawl.

However, your average webmaster won&#039;t be able to stop abuse even with an authenticated crawl because most bots pretend to be visitors cloaked as Firefox and MSIE. Authenticated crawling would just be a simplification of keeping people from spoofing honest bots and the bad guys will just keep crawling.

Solutions ARE coming, but the search engines can&#039;t help you in this regard.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both sitemaps and robots.txt are scraping vulnerabilities, I&#8217;ve seen it happen, so I&#8217;m a big fan of the authenticated crawl.</p>
<p>However, your average webmaster won&#8217;t be able to stop abuse even with an authenticated crawl because most bots pretend to be visitors cloaked as Firefox and MSIE. Authenticated crawling would just be a simplification of keeping people from spoofing honest bots and the bad guys will just keep crawling.</p>
<p>Solutions ARE coming, but the search engines can&#8217;t help you in this regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/up-close-personal-with-robotstxt-10978/comment-page-1#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/up-close-personal-with-robotstxt-10978.php#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>The most important open issue is section targeting IMHO. Defining and standardizing robots.txt syntax to steer crawling on block level and even link attribute level would be a huge step forwards.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most important open issue is section targeting IMHO. Defining and standardizing robots.txt syntax to steer crawling on block level and even link attribute level would be a huge step forwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
