<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Click Fraud Criminal Case Dropped Because Google Didn&#8217;t Cooperate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/was-click-fraud-criminal-case-dropped-because-google-didnt-cooperate-9985/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/was-click-fraud-criminal-case-dropped-because-google-didnt-cooperate-9985</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Teddie</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/was-click-fraud-criminal-case-dropped-because-google-didnt-cooperate-9985/comment-page-1#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Teddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/was-click-fraud-criminal-case-dropped-because-google-didnt-cooperate-9985.php#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Cooperation is one possible angle, else possibly Micheal had never done anything illegal or Googles lawyers could not prove that it was illegal. Either way, in the context of the Pay Per Click ad market this is now a serious problem, Google might just have invalidated the model entirely and set a precedent making future litigation impossible.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cooperation is one possible angle, else possibly Micheal had never done anything illegal or Googles lawyers could not prove that it was illegal. Either way, in the context of the Pay Per Click ad market this is now a serious problem, Google might just have invalidated the model entirely and set a precedent making future litigation impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
