<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Yahoo&#8217;s Panama Update Means For Searchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/what-yahoos-panama-update-means-for-searchers-10454/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/what-yahoos-panama-update-means-for-searchers-10454</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:42:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: aimclear</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/what-yahoos-panama-update-means-for-searchers-10454/comment-page-1#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>aimclear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 12:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/what-yahoos-panama-update-means-for-searchers-10454.php#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Respectfully, this amounts to Yahoo raising their prices.

Yahoo PPC (Overture Legacy) has always been a good value compared to other paid channels. aimClear’s  search marketing clients have always reaped PPC traffic and conversion results which are competitive with Google at a significantly lower price.

Keeping in mind the ultimate and noble goal of increased SERP relevancy for engine users, this still amounts to a price-increase-play towards Y’s objective of bringing paid placement revenue more on par with Google. You can’t hate Y for that. Yahoo paid search has been and will remain an effective channel for marketers. It’s just not so much of a bargain anymore.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respectfully, this amounts to Yahoo raising their prices.</p>
<p>Yahoo PPC (Overture Legacy) has always been a good value compared to other paid channels. aimClear’s  search marketing clients have always reaped PPC traffic and conversion results which are competitive with Google at a significantly lower price.</p>
<p>Keeping in mind the ultimate and noble goal of increased SERP relevancy for engine users, this still amounts to a price-increase-play towards Y’s objective of bringing paid placement revenue more on par with Google. You can’t hate Y for that. Yahoo paid search has been and will remain an effective channel for marketers. It’s just not so much of a bargain anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LongBeachSEM</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/what-yahoos-panama-update-means-for-searchers-10454/comment-page-1#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>LongBeachSEM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/what-yahoos-panama-update-means-for-searchers-10454.php#comment-992</guid>
		<description>I am very happy to see this happen. Relevancy for the searcher is paramount, and with that as a goal, advertisers benefit accordingly. The prior Yahoo! formula quite often put not so relevant ads above me simply because they were willing to spend more - yet my ad copy and landing page were indeed ultimately more relevant and useful to the searcher.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very happy to see this happen. Relevancy for the searcher is paramount, and with that as a goal, advertisers benefit accordingly. The prior Yahoo! formula quite often put not so relevant ads above me simply because they were willing to spend more &#8211; yet my ad copy and landing page were indeed ultimately more relevant and useful to the searcher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.238 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-26 02:15:17 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
