When The Going Gets Tough, The Links Get Blamed

Links are usually the first thing that people look at when something happens in the SERPs. Surely, if your rankings fall, you must just have crap links, right?

Well look elsewhere too…because I’m here to tell you that immediately blaming the links and not looking for problems elsewhere won’t always get those rankings back up.

In fact, if you stop a killer link campaign because you’re convinced that the links are the problem, and you go from 60 to 0mph, that can potentially hurt you even further.

Here’s a synopsis of the main 5 non-linky problems that we’ve encountered and troubleshooted over the years whilst dutifully cranking out the links.

1. Check The Redirects

For this, I rely on Rex Swain’s HTTP Viewer. For those of you who don’t have familiarity with this, here’s how I use it:

  • Enter your URL
  • Uncheck the AutoFollow Location box

Now, it’s a good idea to 301 redirect either the www or the non-www version of your site to the other one. We’ve decided that we want our primary URL to be http://www.linkfishmedia.com and, after entering that here, we see this result:

Link Fish Media HTTP

When we enter the non-www version, we see this result:

Link Fish Media header

 

This is what you want to see on a site. If you don’t have the proper 301 in place, Google can easily think that you’re running two sites and that can cause all sorts of problems from indexation issues to duplicate content to link problems.

Since I’m concerned with links right now, I’ll tell you the main problem I’ve seen with this: a site runs both non-www and www versions with no 301 redirect and links are built to each version. Once someone realizes that a 301 isn’t in place and slaps it in there, you’ve possibly sent half your links through a 301, losing some juice. We’ve seen many situations where a 301, or lack of one, has been a serious link problem.

People build links for years without having it set up, read that they should have a 301 in place, slap it in there, and wonder why their links don’t seem as powerful now. Occasionally, 301s get removed by accident (hard to imagine, but it’s happened) when the webmaster decides to get drunk and dive into the control panel. Splitting link juice will not make a link builder happy.

2. Check The Robots.txt File

Is the whole site blocked for some reason? That has been the problem so many times, I cannot even tell you how many.

It’s particularly common after a recent round of site testing or updates. The robots.txt file is always found at URL/robots.txt and it should be easy enough to decipher, but there are robots check tools for those of you who encounter complicated files.

You don’t want to see this on your site if you’re hoping it’s going to get crawled and indexed:

Robots.txt disallow all

The good news is that if you have inadvertently blocked engines from the site, it’s a very easy problem to fix.

3. Duplicate Content

Do a Copyscape check if you suspect that this is a problem. As we saw with Panda, tons of sites that have stolen your content can indeed outrank you.

If you do find blatant examples of content theft, how you handle that is your personal decision but no matter what, I would indeed try and get that fixed asap. In the spirit of courtesy, I would advise first contacting the webmaster but sadly, I haven’t seen that actually be the easiest way to get the stolen property taken down.

You can have duplicate content on your site as well of course, but from what I’ve seen, having a minor internal dupe content issue like the same small text blurb on every page won’t hurt you.

4. DNS Issues

if your site has a DNS issue, when a crawler comes through and encounters an error, it can’t crawl your site. You can use an online DNS checker to see whether you’re ok. If you check and get an unsuccessful code/error, I’d look into this asap or contact your host for help.

5.  Check In At Google Webmaster Tools

If you don’t use Google Webmaster Tools, let me tell you that it can be a fantastic resource when things aren’t going well. The most recent issue I’ve seen with this is an erroneous geotarget.

In general though, this is an excellent place to get information about how Google is dealing with your site (the Fetch as Googlebot is particularly handy for me.) You can also check for duplicate internal meta tags and titles here. If you’re not a technical person, this tool might just be your best friend and first resource when something goes wrong.

But How Can You Tell If It Is The Links?

I have never seen a backlink profile that did not contain links that, if I were charged with ferreting out the bad seeds, would not raise a flag to me. Certain link tactics are wildly popular and successful, then they’re not, but they aren’t always cleaned up.

It’s rare for me to see a backlink profile that doesn’t contain at least a few footer links on totally irrelevant sites full of broken English. That doesn’t at all mean that these are hurting you though. They probably are sending you zero traffic and are on such low-value sites that any boost from those links is negligible, but that’s very different from hurting you.

For example, let’s say that you’ve been ranking well on the basis of having links come from major shopping sites, and those sites get devalued in a Pandaesque algorithm change. Those links were helping you, now they aren’t, but I still don’t know if I would say that they’re hurting you, especially if they were well-known sites that continued to get good traffic themselves and send you conversions.

However, if you no longer got any traffic from sites that previously accounted for a major proportion of your visits, you’ll obviously need to pursue new links elsewhere. Still, that doesn’t mean those links are hurting you does it?

Honestly, the safest way I know to determine if links are hurting you is to identify a few and remove one at a time, watching the rankings and traffic to see if anything falls further. If you are still getting traffic from links that are poor, I’d keep them. If you previously got traffic and now get nothing, you could remove them and see what happens.

There are definitely times in which cleaning up a link profile seems to magically fix things, but the why of that is up in the air for each case I think. Maybe your percentage of brand/URL anchors is now much more in keeping with the standard for your niche after you removed the anchors used in most of your spammy links.

For another example, If 75% of your links come from devalued or low value sites and you remove links, causing that percentage to fall to 25%, I would expect to see some positive results. Maybe it’s all about manipulating those numbers. Maybe it’s such a unique thing, individual to each site, that it’s impossible to issue blanketed directives.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Link Building | Link Building: General | Link Week Column

Sponsored


About The Author: owns the link development firm Link Fish Media and is one of the founding members of the SEO Chicks blog.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.organicSEOconsultant.com/ Miguel Salcido

    OMG, what a TIMELY post! I just found out today that a site I used to work on for one of my clients did not in fact die in the rankings because of links. The current SEO and I had a conversation since I’m still managing the SEO on another site of theirs and he let me know that it was a technical issue with a bunch of subdomain spam that their programmer created.

    The client berated me for days and pulled me from the account and blamed me and the links I was building. I assumed that it was a factor of too many anchor text links and not enough branded. But turns out I’m not at fault at all.

    So your post resonated well with me!!!

    Also, checking robots.txt is crucial and is so simple that it often gets overlooked. This is especially critical when IT is rolling out new pages or new page designs. They often forget to swap out the dev URL robots file and replace it with the live site’s. And I’ve seen it happen and the site it happened to still has not recovered the top rankings they lost, and this was over a year ago.

  • http://www.augmented-minds.com Augmented Minds

    Great post, thank you!
    I’ve got a question regarding 1. Check The Redirects.
    I’m using a CMS with a plugin to redirect. Now I’ve tested our website with the Rex Swain’s HTTP Viewer and see a 303 there. Is this worse then 301? Should I try to get 301 there?
    Thanks

  • http://www.linkfishmedia.com Julie Joyce

    Hi…thanks for the comments!! And yes, it’s amazing how many times the robots.txt is the culprit isn’t it? I’ve seen it happen at least a few times a year for the past five years.

    @Augmented Minds: I’m not familiar with the details on a 303 (see this and maybe it will help: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html) unfortunately. I wouldn’t personally opt for it but I’m not sure about the reason the plugin does that.

  • http://www.austadpro.com Austadpro

    This is a perfect reason why you should keep track of your link building. But if you have a diverse and large link set, having some bad links shouldn’t hurt. Site owners should also go through their comments and clean out spam. I’ve also seen comments where the user’s link goes to a dead page/site. Either get them to update their profile, or get rid of that 404. I’ve been diving deeper into GWT and definitely agree that it’s an important resource.

  • http://www.rimmkaufman.com George Michie

    Great post, Julie. I’ve heard Matt Cutts say that bad links don’t hurt, they just don’t help, which would argue for not spending time cleaning up backlinks. That made sense to me as it would be really easy to get a competitor’s site blacklisted if bad links did real harm. At the same time, folks caught in link spam rings do suffer penalties from time to time. Is this just a question of volume, or ratios of good to bad? Can Google ferret out “complicity”?

  • http://www.linkfishmedia.com Julie Joyce

    Thanks George! I don’t really think links hurt you…I think they might not help but in my experience, it’s rare to find out that bad links are the reason your site tanks. Other people think differently of course (in fact my fellow SEO Chicks blogger, Judith Lewis, disagrees.) In terms of complicity, I think they’d have to have a better grasp on semantic analysis to ever accurately determine that.

  • http://www.cleverlittledesign.co.uk Gareth

    The black hatters might disagree with you now – have seen a number of forums with people complaining about unnatural link notices from Google and losing their rankings overnight.
    Probably depends how bad your link is – if it gets de-indexed, seems you may get a penalty for having been there… which could lead to all kinds of nasties.

  • http://www.linkfishmedia.com Julie Joyce

    I’ve heard of that happening more often too Gareth…never witnessed it though. I wonder what the percentage of truly bad links is when that happens?

  • http://www.cleverlittledesign.co.uk Gareth

    You’d hope it was close to 100% otherwise black hat SEO might turn towards attacking competitors with splog network links – as I say, all kinds of nasties.

  • http://richardp richardp

    Hi, great post. I’m new to all this, so apologies if I’m asking daft questions!

    I have a 302 on the non-www pointing to the www site, should I get that changed to a 301? The website has been going 10 years.

    Also, sorry I am unclear on the comment about now ‘slapping on a 301′ – will that do harm, should I do something else to?

    Many thanks, I have just found your website and its very interesting, Thank you in advance.
    Richard

  • http://www.linkfishmedia.com Julie Joyce

    Hi Richard,

    A 302 is for a temporary redirect whereas a 301 is permanent. I’ve never seen the change from a 302 to a 301 harm a site in any way, but if anyone has, speak up please! If you have links going to the non-www version, putting in a 301 may give you some nice link benefits too as a 302 doesn’t pass link juice but a 301 does.

 

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide