<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia Founder To Launch Wikiasari Search Engine Early 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/wikipedia-founder-to-launch-wikiasari-search-engine-early-2007-10133/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/wikipedia-founder-to-launch-wikiasari-search-engine-early-2007-10133</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EGOL</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/wikipedia-founder-to-launch-wikiasari-search-engine-early-2007-10133/comment-page-1#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>EGOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/wikipedia-founder-to-launch-wikiasari-search-engine-early-2007-10133.php#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Search engines currently have the ability to observe what visitors do on their site, what they click, how long they spend before backbuttoning...

I like the concept behind this idea but let&#039;s say that this new search engine is strongly embraced by the current folks who love wikipedia... that is not, in my opinion, a good cross-section of web users and therefore the results would be strongly biased towards a certain type of person.

The &quot;flavor&quot; of this type of search engine would be strongly determined by its roots and its exposure - much as the major search engines yield different results based upon their algo - which again are flavored by the ideas of the people who design them.

So, we could end up with algo flavors such as &quot;link pop&quot;, &quot;trust juice&quot; and &quot;page content&quot;.... and community flavors such as &quot;erudite&quot;, &quot;geek&quot;, &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;hillbilly&quot; and &quot;righteous&quot;.

Some folks might really like these community flavors.  I might use them myself when I want reinforcement or a good chuckle.  But where do I go when I want unbiased and accurate?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search engines currently have the ability to observe what visitors do on their site, what they click, how long they spend before backbuttoning&#8230;</p>
<p>I like the concept behind this idea but let&#8217;s say that this new search engine is strongly embraced by the current folks who love wikipedia&#8230; that is not, in my opinion, a good cross-section of web users and therefore the results would be strongly biased towards a certain type of person.</p>
<p>The &#8220;flavor&#8221; of this type of search engine would be strongly determined by its roots and its exposure &#8211; much as the major search engines yield different results based upon their algo &#8211; which again are flavored by the ideas of the people who design them.</p>
<p>So, we could end up with algo flavors such as &#8220;link pop&#8221;, &#8220;trust juice&#8221; and &#8220;page content&#8221;&#8230;. and community flavors such as &#8220;erudite&#8221;, &#8220;geek&#8221;, &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;hillbilly&#8221; and &#8220;righteous&#8221;.</p>
<p>Some folks might really like these community flavors.  I might use them myself when I want reinforcement or a good chuckle.  But where do I go when I want unbiased and accurate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
