<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Click Fraud Settlement Approved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-click-fraud-settlement-approved-10831/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-click-fraud-settlement-approved-10831</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: News On Search Engines, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) &#38; Search Engine Marketing (SEM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 01:30:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffmol</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-click-fraud-settlement-approved-10831/comment-page-1#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffmol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/yahoo-click-fraud-settlement-approved-10831.php#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that so many have so little to say about this case as it&#039;s been going on for quite some time now.  This is BAD for advertisers of all flavors.

Yahoo stands to *benefit* from being sued by its advertisers based on the legal action’s ludicrous settlement terms; terms that absolve them of liability for fraudulent, and more importantly “unwanted”, clicks sent to advertisers over the last 8 years.

In return, advertisers get the opportunity to *ask* for credits (to buy more advertising) and these credits may ultimately be denied by the company.  If you look into the *process* (as I did) you&#039;ll notice that Yahoo&#039;s intent here is to make it nearly impossible (obviously, that&#039;s just my professional opinion) to actually get the credits (sound familiar?... i.e. Google).

The $5 million Yahoo! will pay to Checkmate Strategic Group is, in effect, a VERY cost effective insurance policy against click fraud concerns that may arise in the future; all while, legally, &lt;strong&gt;never admitting fault and promising advertisers not one dime based on my research of court documents.  &lt;/strong&gt;

It gets worse -- the Class is HUGE given that advertisers were all auto-opted into it.  Opting out?  You&#039;d not believe that process either.  I&#039;ve documented all of this stuff here &lt;a href=&quot;http://xr.com/yahoo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://xr.com/yahoo&lt;/a&gt;


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that so many have so little to say about this case as it&#8217;s been going on for quite some time now.  This is BAD for advertisers of all flavors.</p>
<p>Yahoo stands to *benefit* from being sued by its advertisers based on the legal action’s ludicrous settlement terms; terms that absolve them of liability for fraudulent, and more importantly “unwanted”, clicks sent to advertisers over the last 8 years.</p>
<p>In return, advertisers get the opportunity to *ask* for credits (to buy more advertising) and these credits may ultimately be denied by the company.  If you look into the *process* (as I did) you&#8217;ll notice that Yahoo&#8217;s intent here is to make it nearly impossible (obviously, that&#8217;s just my professional opinion) to actually get the credits (sound familiar?&#8230; i.e. Google).</p>
<p>The $5 million Yahoo! will pay to Checkmate Strategic Group is, in effect, a VERY cost effective insurance policy against click fraud concerns that may arise in the future; all while, legally, <strong>never admitting fault and promising advertisers not one dime based on my research of court documents.  </strong></p>
<p>It gets worse &#8212; the Class is HUGE given that advertisers were all auto-opted into it.  Opting out?  You&#8217;d not believe that process either.  I&#8217;ve documented all of this stuff here <a href="http://xr.com/yahoo" rel="nofollow">http://xr.com/yahoo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.248 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-26 01:32:26 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
