<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo To Build &#8220;Brand Universe&#8221; To Connect Entertainment Brands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-to-build-brand-universe-to-connect-entertainment-brands-10399/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-to-build-brand-universe-to-connect-entertainment-brands-10399</link>
	<description>Search Engine Land: Must Read News About Search Marketing &#38; Search Engines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sramana Mitra</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-to-build-brand-universe-to-connect-entertainment-brands-10399/comment-page-1#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Sramana Mitra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/yahoo-to-build-brand-universe-to-connect-entertainment-brands-10399.php#comment-897</guid>
		<description>Very recently, I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://sramanamitra.com/blog/484&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;4C: Yahoo&#039;s Turnaround Formula&lt;/a&gt;, criticizing them for having haphazard offerings with no segmentation.

This announcement addresses some of my points, in that they are actually tying together various disjointed and haphazard properties around a particular brand, and creating an integrated experience.

I like it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very recently, I wrote <a href="http://sramanamitra.com/blog/484" rel="nofollow">4C: Yahoo&#8217;s Turnaround Formula</a>, criticizing them for having haphazard offerings with no segmentation.</p>
<p>This announcement addresses some of my points, in that they are actually tying together various disjointed and haphazard properties around a particular brand, and creating an integrated experience.</p>
<p>I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contentmuse</title>
		<link>http://searchengineland.com/yahoo-to-build-brand-universe-to-connect-entertainment-brands-10399/comment-page-1#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>contentmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchengineland.com/beta/yahoo-to-build-brand-universe-to-connect-entertainment-brands-10399.php#comment-896</guid>
		<description>This at first glance seems like a convenience for users, but I am getting a faint feeling of &#039;1984&#039;coming into 2007- I get an uneasy feeling about the &quot;appeal&quot; of the brands being tracked by Yahoo&#039;s &quot;vast user network.&quot;  I think there are enough arenas for those with similar interests to communicate and turn one another on to products and ideas.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This at first glance seems like a convenience for users, but I am getting a faint feeling of &#8216;1984&#8242;coming into 2007- I get an uneasy feeling about the &#8220;appeal&#8221; of the brands being tracked by Yahoo&#8217;s &#8220;vast user network.&#8221;  I think there are enough arenas for those with similar interests to communicate and turn one another on to products and ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
