• http://www.facebook.com/siemers Johannes Siemers

    Just took a quick look into the Sistrix Toolbox. They have Amazon.com rankings for 561.341 Keywords. Wikipedia shows up 702.127 times. That seems relatively close. But the rankings of Wikipedia where 44.5 % of the times found on page 1 – Amazon only 28 %. This shows up in their visibility index. Wikipedia is with 7.768 points number one on Google.com. Amazon comes with 2.174 points in as number two.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Roberts/100000774795966 Mike Roberts

    Great article Matt.  I posted a fixed version of that chart to your G+ account.  Also, for anyone that’s interested, I posted a follow up to this study called: 
    “5 years of Social Media in Google Rankings; Tumblr Set to Overtake Twitter”http://www.spyfu.com/blog/5-years-social-media-google-rankings-tumblr-overtake-twitter-serps 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Roberts/100000774795966 Mike Roberts

    Hey Johannes — yeah, the raw numbers are good addition.  For reference, in February, we see Amazon on 4,946,441 searches and Wikipedia on 4,677,130. 

    So, pretty close. 

  • https://plus.google.com/102332585585742853551/posts Atif

    because amazon gives them a lot of money in adwords ;-)

  • Maxime RAUER

    Thanks for this article Matt. I imagine eBay deals correspond to the spike we are seeing in February 2011.

  • Eye Paq

    or maybe because it make sense for everybody to rank… 

  • James Finlayson

    Interesting data. I’ve just looked in Searchmetrics and it shows Wikipedia beating Amazon 5/1. Any have any ideas how the two match up? Searchmetrics only looks over 100 million keywords – so it may just be a case of the latter being less accurate.

  • http://www.askforeman.com/ Stephen Foreman

    Interesting how Yahoo results have been slipping down in Google!

  • http://www.resg.info Anton Stetner

    Amazon will most likely win becauae of its ads and affilates.

  • http://FireYourBossProject.ORG/blog Sandor Benko

    Thanks for the great article and pointing out the trend. Raw numbers can be interpreted in a bunch of ways, but Amazon is definitely on the rise.

  • http://www.facebook.com/linkbuilderguru Seolinkbuilder Guru

    j

  • http://www.facebook.com/ShahMazhar Mazhar Shah

     Hi Matt!

                  I agreed with you up to some extent not completely you know why..? I am sure that Wikipedia could get more better position in Google. But i am not sure that Amazon can beat Wikipedia Caz this is a e commerce platform and the Wikipedia have all in one…:)

  • Diet PH

    Mazhar, wikipedia result only shows up when it’s not a keyword that can bring them a lot of money. For example if you search for an actor name, definitely it cant be really monetized by them so Google would put up Wikipedia in first page. However if we are talking about money machine keywords, it’s entirely different case. “weight loss pills” is not a e-commerce keyword but Google knows it brings a lot of money so they still put up Google store results at the top of the SERPs. Amazon, in most cases, can ride the wave because they might share commission with Google.

    In the end, it’s all about the money.

  • Fosti Nosti

    fantasticc

    car lease take over 

  • http://www.semmedia.org/ SEM Media

    It was a great informative tips, as i am an amazon affiliate. Thanks

  • chris_bolte

    I have it on good authority that SpyFu is biased; having been paid off by Amazon to write something like this.  SpyFu is a small company.  Amazon is big.  Can anyone put 2 and 2 together, here??!  Matt- you really ought to look into your facts before publsihing something like this.  everyone knows wikipedia has better results but where’s there budget to pay companies like spyfu to list them higher?