• PeterCaoHotel

    Starting from Gabriele Scheler’s atrocity case on Stanford campus [Stanford Police Case Number: IR #04-111-0335;Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler;] there follows a series crimes in which Sebastian Thrun, Eric Schmidt, Angela Merkel, etc. and people associated with them had involved (e.g. Thrun’s student David Stavens had gone to police and file false accusation on me on behalf of Thrun’s side, and Eric Schmidt had involved into conspiracy of endangering human lives); but their crimes had been covered up by certain malicious officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV with miscarriage of justice, and victim (e.g. me) was conspired and further victimized;

    —Believe me, the damage to a person’s life would be much worse and last forever out of egregious miscarriage of justice from certain malicious officers (in my case ZZZ/YYY/VVV, is VVV from FBI?), than from those criminals (in this case Gabriele Scheler, etc.) who had originally committed crimes on that person; you don’t want to have such a horrible experience; it’ll molest your whole life;
    —All tragedies in this case are caused by the miscarriage of justice from certain malicious officers; I am sure that until the date Gabriele Scheler’s case completely clarified at authorities, which officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV had tried to prevent from happening, such malicious officers would install more and more tragedies into our lives; When we clarify the case, we will see;
    —Who are officers in charge of Gabriele Scheler’s accusations ZZZ/YYY/VVV? they are the actual crime producers and time to clarify the case and end the dire consequences from their miscarriage of justice, and have them take the responsibilities; Would anyone like to live under the jurisdiction of such malicious and cowardice officers?

  • PeterCaoHotel

    Eric Schmidt/Sebastian Thrun/Gabriele Scheler/Angela Merkel/Ed Feigenbaum/Kaifu Lee, etc. had lost his credibility when he got involved into fascism crimes which had endangered human lives
    ——————————————————
    There is actually a war between fascism and anti-fascism, at this stage, fascism still prevails in our lives, Eric Schmidt, Sebastian Thrun and Gabriele Scheler are just front figures we could see in this fascism circle, there is a whole pack of fascists behind them
    as we can see, starting from Gabriele Scheler’s atrocity case on Stanford campus back in 2004, many people, including Gabriele Scheler, Sebastian Thrun, you Eric Schmidt, Professor Ed Feigenbaum of Sebastian Thrun’s boss in Stanford Computer Science department, a big donor CCC of Stanford Computer Science department, and also Eric Schmidt’s colleague in China Kaifu Lee, had made contributions to such fascism crimes which had cost life of Stanford student May Zhou and crimes which had retaliated on victims and almost cost life of the victim as I am …
    … … and someone who had provided legal coverage for your fascism crimes, including a powerful officer from Santa Clara DA Office, namely ZZZ (and after ZZZ, another officer YYY), and the officer VVV who’s in charge of Gabriele Scheler’s case and who had further collateralled with your side(suspect Eric Schmidt, Sebastian Thrun and Gabriele Scheler’s side) to conspire and curse victims in every possible way since 2006 till today; and maybe include the officer RRR who insist on May Zhou’s death as a suicide or accident …
    … … and someone who could provide political support for your fascism crimes, including top politician from the country of Germany whom we all know — Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, and maybe include a retired top politician from UK as well, etc. and more and more to find out later …
    —————————————————
    I believe, though some names missed out, all names mentioned in the above comment are part of this fascism circle

  • PeterCaoHotel

    Q&A about Fascism crimes on land of Palo Alto, CA in which Eric Schmidt/Sebastian Thrun/Gabriele Scheler/Ed Feigenbaum/ Angela Merkel had involved and which were covered up by certain malicious officers with miscarriage of justice
    =====================================================
    Ducatigirl,
    No matter what kind of relation you have with Gabriele Scheler, or even if you are Gabriele Scheler herself, when you got the idea that:
    >>>”He has also filed some false police reports, which PAPD has been kind enough not to prosecute him for, as in the case of Gabriele Schiele, a German student”
    —— Don’t believe in Officer VVV (same as ZZZ/YYY/RRR) who’s in charge of Gabriele Scheler’s accusations; VVV had already lost his/her credibility after being cowardice for so many years in light of both my public and official challenges; don’t believe in such officer, such officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV are fooling around with all people involved, including with criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler, with Stanford, with Google, with Sebastian Thrun/Eric Schmidt/Angela Merkel, and with victim as I am, etc.; VVV had made up the case to curse me and to cover up real crimes, but VVV dare not clarify the case with me with confrontation; Don’t believe in anything VVV told you in name of judicial authorities; VVV has no credibility as an officer at all;
    — The crimes are not only coming from those fascists who had committed these crimes, but also from certain malicious officers in the judicial system, especially ZZZ/YYY/VVV, who’s egregiously miscarriage of justice;
    — It is strange that those who accuse me never talk to me about their accusations against me, but call in more and more innocent people to mess up the situation; and certain malicious officers had conspired victims (e.g. me) in collateral with criminal suspects (Gabriele Scheler’s side); And all tragedies in this case are caused by the egregious miscarriage of justice from certain malicious officers; time to clarify the case with confrontation; and have those involved into such crimes, especially ZZZ/YYY/VVV, take the responsibility
    —Time to clarify the case and have those who had produced such anti-humanity crimes(especially Officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV) responsible; and officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV (prosecutors?) are the actual crime producers since Gabriele Scheler’s campus atrocity in 2004; and all tragedies in this case are caused by the egregious miscarriage of justice from such malicious officers, ZZZ/YYY/VVV; but without clarification of the case, more tragedies would be produced as a result of their miscarriage of justice for these many years; when we clarify the case, we will see
    ————————————————————-
    P.S. Gabriele Scheler’s atrocity case on Stanford campus [Stanford Police Case Number: IR #04-111-0335;Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler ]

  • PeterCaoHotel

    ————————————————————-
    >>>He has also filed some false police reports,
    — Stanford Police wrote the report after serious investigation in 2004; It is Gabriele Scheler who filed false police reports, I did not; and that’s why in police report, Gabriele Scheler is clearly defined as a criminal suspect while I am a victim; [Stanford Police Case Number: IR #04-111-0335;Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler]
    Gabriele Scheler must have recanted her testimony and gone to another place to file further false reports such as ‘sexual assault’, but the officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV who’s handling Gabriele Scheler’s accusations had made up the case on Scheler’s recanted testimony without even interviewing me once; so in Gabriele Scheler’s case, ZZZ/YYY/VVV had collateralled with criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler to file false police reports;
    ………………………..
    >>>PAPD has been kind enough not to prosecute him for, as in the case of Gabriele Schiele, a German student.
    —Such a shameless claim from you. Though I didn’t know the case is handled at PAPD, would you tell me the name of the officer “who’s been kind enough not to prosecute” me? What’s his/her contact? from which agency?
    Do you mean, even though such malicious officers didn’t fulfill their responsibility to prosecute criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler for years, now they want to turn back and prosecute victim as I am? I mean, come on, and bring them on directly to me; my contact:[ caomingpeter@163.com ]; so far they never dare

  • PeterCaoHotel

    Also, Kaifu Lee, who served as a cat’s paw in this fascism circle and who tried to get personal interest in collateral with such fascism circle to get back to Google China., which he had abandoned in 2009, had publicly humiliated the Romneys with a racy post on his weibo site right after the election is over;

    As a reminder, till today, that racy post on Kaifu Lee’s weibo site displayed on 2012/11/07 http://tiny.cc/4egkow(Chinese version of twitter, Kaifu Lee has over 20 million followers there) to humiliate an innocent woman, Romney’s wife , is still alive on Kaifu Lee’s weibo site;

    But a man with education should never publicly humiliate an innocent woman, even if she is wife of a presidential candidate, and especially after the election is over; Kaifu Lee, as a public figure owe Romney’s wife, as well as owe the general public, a formal apology over such a despicable behavior from him;

    Reply

  • PeterCaoHotel

    Kaifu Lee is a cat’s paw in a fascism circle; Kaifu Lee’s vice in China started from his self-potraited cleverness; He often takes advantage of his cleverness to fool the average Chinese people, and take advantages of the average Chinese people with his strong foriegn background;

    And in case of Kaifu Lee’s racy action on the Romneys, he is trying to fawn on dignitaries who are Romney’s rivals in the U.S., in order to bum for support from them to get Lee himself back to Google which Lee had abandoned to start his personal business in 2009; Kaifu Lee’s such despicable action has misled belief of Chinese people over American people, and also is a clear humiliation to the dignity of the people of the United States

    — Such a despicable behavior from such a despicable soul

  • PeterCaoHotel

    Eric Schmidt had involved into multiple crimes in Stanford which are fascism by nature. Eric Schmidt is a member in a fascism circle, so is Kaifu Lee in the same fascism circle; both of them had involved into a series fascism crimes endanger human lives and in retaliation against victims; so far fascism they had produced into our lives still prevails;

  • PeterCaoHotel

    Eric Schmidt/Sebastian Thrun/Gabriele Scheler/Angela Merkel/Ed Feigenbaum / Kaifu Lee, etc. had lost his credibility when he got involved into fascism crimes which had endangered human lives

    ——————————————————

    There is actually a war between fascism and anti-fascism, at this stage, fascism still prevails in our lives, Eric Schmidt, Sebastian Thrun and Gabriele Scheler are just front figures we could see in this fascism circle, there is a whole pack of fascists behind them

    as we can see, starting from Gabriele Scheler’s atrocity case on Stanford campus back in 2004, many people, including Gabriele Scheler, Sebastian Thrun, you Eric Schmidt, Professor Ed Feigenbaum of Sebastian Thrun’s boss in Stanford Computer Science department, a big donor CCC of Stanford Computer Science department, and also Eric Schmidt’s colleague in China Kaifu Lee, had made contributions to such fascism crimes which had cost life of Stanford student May Zhou and crimes which had retaliated on victims and almost cost life of the victim as I am …

  • http://alexwebmaster.com/ Alex Garrido

    Danny, in my opinion author rank is already here. Just not in the way everybody think it is. You see, every +1 and share counts as a link, just like links from relevant authoritative websites count for rankings, the same thing occurs when post and shares from authority profiles in G+. Everytime you get an endorsement, Google associates your profile with the websites that you are contributor to (tiered backlinking style), you can see this by logging into webmaster tools and see that after an aggressive Google plus marketing camp you will get increased links from “Google”.

    Just my 2 cents. :D

  • Lyndon NA

    With anyluck, your voice will carry this far enough to get through the thick skulls of many SEOs out there.

    From nearly day one of G+, a bunch of us saw the potential.
    G+ and G+ profiles as verification and vetting tools.
    The ability to identify relationships between profiles (there are patents for that too).
    The possibility of assigning topical authority (similar to Site Authority) (covered in the agent rank patent)
    etc. etc. etc.

    Then the patent was found – and all of a sudden the net is flooded with experts and pro’s confusing Authorship markup with AuthorRank, mixing up Social Influence with AuthorRank, stating that QDF results are a sign of AuthorRank, declaring links are dead and social is the future etc. etc. etc.

    The cold reality is that it isn’t live, and there is the remote possibility it may not be in the (near) future;

    (G may be having issues with it. For starters they are struggling with the [+1], and then the auto-association of Authorship. If they are struggling with those, how do people expect to get AuthorRank working?).

    Some of us have tried to stem the tide – but it’s nigh impossible.
    Here’s hoping this shuts them up!

  • PeterCaoSun

    Eric Schmidt is a member in a fascism circle, who had involved into a series fascism crimes which had endanger human lives and in retaliation against victims; so far fascism they had produced into our lives still prevails;
    ————————————————–
    Starting from Gabriele Scheler’s atrocity case on Stanford campus [Stanford Police Case Number: IR #04-111-0335;Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler;] there follows a series crimes in which Sebastian Thrun, Eric Schmidt, Angela Merkel, etc. and people associated with them had involved (e.g. Thrun’s student David Stavens had gone to police and file false accusation on me on behalf of Thrun’s side, and Eric Schmidt had threatened my life with the death of Stanford student May Zhou and later Schmidt had involved into an unsuccessful plotted murder on me as well); but their crimes had been covered up by certain malicious officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV with miscarriage of justice, and victim (e.g. me) was conspired and further victimized;

    — Believe me, the damage to a person’s life would be much worse and last forever out of egregious miscarriage of justice from certain malicious officers (in my case ZZZ/YYY/VVV, is VVV from FBI?), than from those criminals (in this case Gabriele Scheler, etc.) who had originally committed crimes on that person; you don’t want to have such a horrible experience; it’ll molest your whole life;
    — All tragedies in this case are caused by the miscarriage of justice from certain malicious officers; I am sure that until the date Gabriele Scheler’s case completely clarified at authorities, which officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV had tried to prevent from happening, such malicious officers would install more and more tragedies into our lives; When we clarify the case, we will see;
    — Who are officers in charge of Gabriele Scheler’s accusations ZZZ/YYY/VVV? they are the actual crime producers and time to clarify the case and end the dire consequences from their miscarriage of justice, and have them take the responsibilities; Would anyone like to live under the jurisdiction of such malicious and cowardice officers?

  • PeterCaoSun

    Q&A about Fascism crimes on land of Palo Alto which Sebastian
    Thrun/Gabriele Scheler/Ed Feigenbaum/Eric Schmidt/Angela Merkel had involved
    and which were covered up by certain malicious officers with miscarriage of
    justice

    =====================================================

    Ducatigirl,

    No matter what kind of relation you have with Gabriele Scheler, or even
    if you are Gabriele Scheler herself, when you got the idea that:

    >>>”He has also filed some false police reports, which
    PAPD has been kind enough not to prosecute him for, as in the case of Gabriele
    Schiele, a German student”

    —— Don’t believe in Officer VVV (same as ZZZ/YYY/RRR) who’s in
    charge of Gabriele Scheler’s accusations; VVV had already lost his/her
    credibility after being cowardice for so many years in light of both my public
    and official challenges; don’t believe in such officer, such officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV
    are fooling around with all people involved, including with criminal suspect
    Gabriele Scheler, with Stanford, with Google, with Sebastian Thrun/Eric
    Schmidt/Angela Merkel, and with victim as I am, etc.; VVV had made up the case
    to curse me and to cover up real crimes, but VVV dare not clarify the case with
    me with confrontation; Don’t believe in anything VVV told you in name of
    judicial authorities; VVV has no credibility as an officer at all;

    — The crimes are not only coming from those fascists who had committed
    these crimes, but also from certain malicious officers in the judicial system,
    especially ZZZ/YYY/VVV, who’s egregiously miscarriage of justice;

    — It is strange that those who accuse me never talk to me about their
    accusations against me, but call in more and more innocent people to mess up
    the situation; And all tragedies in this case are caused by the egregious
    miscarriage of justice from certain malicious officers in collateral with those
    criminal suspects; time to clarify the case with confrontation; and have those
    involved into such crimes, especially ZZZ/YYY/VVV, take the responsibility

    –Time to clarify the case and have those who had produced such anti-humanity
    crimes(especially Officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV) responsible; and officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV
    (prosecutors?) are the actual crime producers since Gabriele Scheler’s campus
    atrocity in 2004; and all tragedies in
    this case are caused by the egregious miscarriage of justice from such
    malicious officers, ZZZ/YYY/VVV; without clarification of the case, more
    tragedies would be produced as a result of their miscarriage of justice for
    these many years; when we clarify the case, we will see

    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    P.S. Gabriele Scheler’s atrocity case on
    Stanford campus [Stanford Police Case Number: IR #04-111-0335;Victim: Peter
    Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler]

  • Lyndon NA

    Not being funny Alex, but last time I checked, +1′s weren’t reliable, and G weren’t using them due to being unable to reliably/consistently separate noise from signal. –

    Even if things have changed (in the past month or two), the chances are that +’s are minor signal, and I seriously doubt they weigh in as anything close to a link in value. –

    What is far more likely is that such social signals can be taken as “activity and interest”, which may contribute towards things like Freshness.

  • http://profiles.google.com/trappermark Mark Traphagen

    Excellent, clear-headed article, Danny, on this much-hyped and much misunderstood topic. I had the same take on Schmidt’s quote when it first surfaced (see http://www.virante.org/blog/2013/02/06/google-author-rank-has-google-chairman-eric-schmidt-now-confirmed-it/), but your longer excerpt only confirms what I suspected at the time. We might also add that Schmidt’s book is his speculations about the future, So that makes it even less worthwhile as “proof” that Google is doing Author Rank today.

  • http://alexwebmaster.com/ Alex Garrido

    Of course, Google is smart and always seeks to get the greater picture. But if you genuinely gain a lot of relevancy/social interaction in Gplus, I think that is a major ranking signal that is too strong for G to ignore

  • http://www.merchantprocessingresource.com/ Sean Murray

    Considering how buggy Authorship is (my personal example: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109189137968513076451/posts/8uYJ9FJVauk) , there’s no way Author Rank could possibly exist on Google at this time. They have a long, long way to go.

  • rozellaquine27lr

    my best friend’s step-sister makes $71 hourly on the laptop. She has been out of a job for 6 months but last month her pay was $13935 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more on  Ask25.c­om

  • Durant Imboden

    If and when Google were to make AuthorRank part of its ranking algorithm, the most foolproof approach would be to rely on a known citation mechanism: links. Links have been around since the World Wide Web was invented, and Google has years of experience in determining which links are valuable, which should be ignored, etc. Just as important, links are far more widely used than “social shares” (especially Google Plus +1 clicks) are.

    Maybe “social signals” will have value someday, but in the meantime, wouldn’t it make more sense for Google to leverage the signals that it already knows and uses in its ranking algorithm?

    My guess: Initially, at least, AuthorRank will simply be a portable, people-focused version of what Google is already doing. Instead of merely assigning PageRank, authority, etc. to inanimate pages or domains, Google will also assign PageRank, authority, etc. to the authors of those pages.

  • http://twitter.com/rcnmarketing RCN Online Marketing

    I got into the author tags when they first came out mainly on the hope that it was Google’s fix for dealing with scraped content and first authorship on articles. That benefit wasn’t really discussed in this article, though. Am I wrong that the use of the author tag has this benefit for those of us trying to further protect our content from the scrapers?

  • http://www.seo-theory.com/ Michael Martinez

    Eh! The think-headed ignore Danny as much as they ignore anyone else. :)

  • Lyndon NA

    Surely not! Some of them must pay attention to some of the “names” :D
    That said, I fear you are right :(

  • Lyndon NA

    Based on what? Popularity? G should have learned that lesson by now, so I doubt they will pay too much attention to the volume of +’s etc.
    Yes, G+ has an advantage – it’s G owned and G monitored – they can have more trust in the accounts than those on FB/Twitter etc. But for them to start throwing “that much” weight into a profile is unlikely.

    Most of what people see and claim as AuthorRank or G+ Rank is little more that the G+ Injected SERPs (which seem to be weighted on frequency/activity as well as poss. popularity), and Freshness/Trending.

  • http://alexwebmaster.com/ Alex Garrido

    I could not agree more with you.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kumarworld2 Bhanu Seo

    Authorship is just getting more stronger in Search but the privacy is getting weaker! If you have to rule the search you need to lose your privacy?

    Google is just trying to make plus bucket full! there should be some idle way to deal this

    Being a writer, i prefer not to expose myself? but now this is going weird.

  • Brenda Thompson

    Lillian. you think Danny`s blog is impressive, last week I got themselves a Mazda MX-5 sincee geting a check for $5791 this past month and also $10,000 last munth. without a doubt its the most-rewarding I’ve ever had. I actually started 5 months ago and right away startad making minimum $81 per hour. I use this website, jump15.comCHECK IT OUT

  • http://twitter.com/CCrum237 Chris Crum

    Schmidt’s quotes tend to get taken out of context a lot.

  • http://www.dekh.com/members/profile/13 Harsh Bawa

    Reputation will matter more and more as we move forward. Over time,Google will be caring more about identity and social. I have already implemented authorship on my site and so far I am looking to have the content linking to my G+ profile.

    Google has been wanting people to use one identity, your name, across accounts. It is a signal that Google is paving the way to have a much more transparent approach to who is behind content and assigning value accordingly.

    I would be interested to see who are the top authors :D

    Hope Google will implement it ;)

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100005435076101 John Sunney

    Please contact us if you need our products.Welcome to patronize our Website! Led Web-Stores

    LED WEBSITE

  • http://www.facebook.com/kumarworld2 Bhanu Seo

    If you are top author it wont hurt you! but beginners have to face the real problem. their will receive bumps for their simple mistakes

  • http://twitter.com/schachin Kristine Schachinger
  • edythewiseman

    my classmate’s sister-in-law makes $71 every hour on the internet. She has been unemployed for 10 months but last month her pay was $18766 just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more on  Ask25.c­om

  • or zilberman

    Google does already look at those metrics though maybe not to the extent that Eric is talking about but sure do to some moderate extent.

    The future of this really does hold the question of privacy and if the anonymity of users in the internet, one of the things that allowed for pluralism on it’s start will be gone now as anonymous content will be impossible to rank for.

    Anyway changing the algorithm or not, the ctr’s are higher with authority (at least until people’s eyes will get used to it and will filter it like banners)

  • Miklin SEO

    I wonder if Google will gauge co-authorship. Basically, rich mark up that could be added to the head tag, looking like <…... That would be a great way to give credit to both the author and the agency.

  • http://www.facebook.com/workwithjamiehudson Jamie Hudson

    Author Rank is already here.

    It has been for some time, is it suddenly going to be immensely important and over take the importance of the old Page Rank paradigm? Nope.

    The way I see it, links are still as powerful as ever (apart from a few discounted link building practices), social signals have a minor effect on rankings and Google Authorship is only remotely useful at this time.

    With that said this is going to happen, I am sure they’ll find a way to incorporate “Author Rank” into the algorithm in a major way.

    It makes a ton of sense, the only question is how reliable this will be and how effective, how they will get it to work in conjunction with the current way they rank websites.

    Lastly, what we’ve seen happen over the past few years for certain is Google favoring authority websites. So surviving all the updates and dominating the SERPs is about building AUTHORITY and becoming a major site in your niche.

    To build an authority presence in your niche, first you need regular awesome content, a great site and lots of high Page Rank backlinks. High PR relevant links will make you rank for any keyword every time, no buts. 1000′s of social signals won’t do much for you when it comes to ranking for big terms.

    Anyway, the authority…. Building a following on Google+, as well as Facebook and Twitter build authority. For the reason that they build a more loyal audience (think repeat visitors) and a more social community (think social sharing).

    Ultimately everything SEOs are saying will build your Author Rank (even if AR isn’t relevant), will still help you build your site authority and become an unstoppable force in your niche.

  • http://www.keyhousemedia.com/ Ryan Key

    My site was ranking for a great key phrase for about a month, then it just disappeared. Whats up Google?

  • fjpoblam

    Question with perhaps an *obvious* answer, but I just want to confirm it in my pea brain. Does Google consider *Google+* the very *only* acceptable location for an author profile? Must one fetch and maintain a Google+ profile in order to be “relevant” in search? Am I doomed on the WWW (insofar as Google search results may be concerned) without a Google+ profile?

  • http://profiles.google.com/trappermark Mark Traphagen

    Yes, Google Authorship is based on Google knowing you’re identity via a Google+ profile. To date they have established no other means by which you can verify Authorship for Google SERPS. As for remaining “relevant,” who can say? Google is still very far away from being able to implement anything like an “author rank,” so as far as a direct ranking signal, no. But you will miss out on whatever benefits having your photo in SERPs might bring.

  • Ash

    Auhtor rank is quite interesting concept of Google. If you are spreading out good content, it will help you to build a good reputation in turns branding but at the same site if intentionally or unintentionally if you have spread low value content, Google might devalue your profile in turn all the good/bad/moderate shares connected with that profile will get devalued.

  • Ash

    for all your keywords or few?

  • http://www.ryan-key.com/ Ryan Key

    just a few as far as I know.

  • Ash

    Then I don’t think its anything to worry about. it might be because of the competition. My few keywords got raised in rankings in last few days. and at the same time few dropped a bit so its normal competition stuff. you just need to focus on those keywords more to get rankings bank :)