PageRank Sculpting Is Dead! Long Live PageRank Sculpting!

Earlier this month, Google’s Matt Cutts sent a shockwave through the advanced SEO community by saying that site owners could no longer perform “PageRank sculpting” using the nofollow tag in the way they’d previously thought. Now Matt’s posted more explanation about the change. But rather than stop PageRank sculpting, I expect his explanation will simply cause it to continue in an alternative manner.

Google Loses “Backwards Compatibility” On Paid Link Blocking & PageRank Sculpting is my previous post that covers the background on PageRank sculpting: how it works, how it became popular over the past two years and how Matt said it no longer works. It’s an essential companion piece to this update, so be sure to read it.

Nofollow Doesn’t Mean Nocount

In particular, Matt’s post today says that over a year ago, Google changed its algorithms so that links with a nofollow tag (technically the nofollow attribute) on them still counted toward how PageRank was divvied up among all links on a page:

What happens when you have a page with “ten PageRank points” and ten outgoing links, and five of those links are nofollowed? Let’s leave aside the decay factor to focus on the core part of the question. Originally, the five links without nofollow would have flowed two points of PageRank each (in essence, the nofollowed links didn’t count toward the denominator when dividing PageRank by the outdegree of the page). More than a year ago, Google changed how the PageRank flows so that the five links without nofollow would flow one point of PageRank each.

If you think that any page on your web site has a certain amount of PageRank it can give to the pages it links to — money that might help them rank better in varying degrees — then here’s how things have changed recently.

Before 2005, the nofollow tag didn’t exist. So, there was no easy way to “block” some links on a page from receiving some of the page’s PageRank. For example, imagine that a page had $10 of PageRank to spend. It contained 10 links. The money — the PageRank — was divided equally among the links. Each got $1.

In 2007, nofollow not only existed but became popular as a way for people to “sculpt” PageRank. The same page puts nofollow on 5 of the 10 links, such as on navigational links. The PageRank is divided equally among the remaining 5 — each gets $2. Potentially, that helps those five rank a bit better. Maybe a tiny bit; maybe much more depending on whom you choose to believe.

Sometime in 2008, Matt says Google changed things. The same page still has $10 to spend, still has 10 links and still has 5 of them nofollowed. Google looks at ALL the links (even the nofollow ones), divides PageRank equally and allocates $1 to each link. The regular links get their $1. Those with nofollow don’t get any spend at all.

What’s The Change Mean?

Should you worry about the change? I don’t think so. The reported change simply means that regular links no longer get to cash in on extra PageRank. It doesn’t mean that they get penalized. As I wrote before, it’s similar to how the meta keywords tag used to be rewarded more heavily in some search algorithms. When that changed, no one had to strip out all their old meta keywords data. It just no longer helped as much as in the past.

Should you change tactics because of the change? There are some people who swear by PageRank sculpting, that it really works. If you’re one of those, you have to decide whether you believe what Google’s saying or not. That leads to an important point on how long it took Google to disclose that this change happened.

Delay In Disclosure

Make no mistake, Google helped advanced the notion of using nofollow to flow PageRank. No one was forced to do it; no one is being punished that it might no longer work. But Google did help put it out there, and that’s why it should have spoken up sooner when it took nofollow out as a sculpting tool. Instead, it said nothing about the change that happened sometime from May 2008 or earlier. Why?

At first, we figured that site owners or people running tests would notice, but they didn’t. In retrospect, we’ve changed other, larger aspects of how we look at links and people didn’t notice that either, so perhaps that shouldn’t have been such a surprise. So we started to provide other guidance that PageRank sculpting isn’t the best use of time.

Other guidance? How about simply saying soon after the change — clearly and plainly — that nofollow didn’t leave links out of the PageRank calculations?

There were plenty of opportunities for this. PageRank sculpting was discussed at no less than four different conferences after the change happened, including our SMX Advanced search marketing conference in 2008. There was no end of articles and commentary on the web about it. In Matt’s video from May 23 of this year, specifically about PageRank sculpting, he said nothing about the change.

The delay has the conspiracy theories brewing. The top one is that PageRank sculpting using nofollow does work. That Google’s changed nothing, and that’s why no one noticed any changes. That PageRank sculpting with nofollow, in fact, works so well that Google’s now simply saying that nofollow links get counted again even when they don’t.

Ultimately, each person will have to decide for themselves what they want to believe.

Do I Have To Care?

What to do next? I was never a big pusher of PageRank sculpting myself. I figured that Google’s algorithms simply looked at all the links on page, the location of those links, the repetition within a particular web site and figured out for itself how to spend a page’s PageRank on them. Matt himself confirmed this during his keynote talk at SMX Advanced 2009, and he confirmed it again in response to my comment on his blog post:

Yes, I would agree that Google itself solely decides how much PageRank will flow to each and every link on a particular page. But that’s no reason to make PageRank a complete black box; if I can help provide people with a more accurate mental model, overall I think that’s a good thing. For example, from your proposed paragraph I would strike the “The number of links doesn’t matter” sentence because most of the time the number of links do matter, and I’d prefer that people know that. I would agree with the rest of your paragraph explanation

Based on his comment, I revised my explanation of how Google assigns PageRank to this:

Google itself solely decides how much PageRank will flow to each and every link on a particular page. In general, the more links on a page, the less PageRank each link gets. Google might decide some links don’t deserve credit and give them no PageRank. The use of nofollow doesn’t ‘conserve’ PageRank for other links; it simply prevents those links from getting any PageRank that Google otherwise might have given them.

For the most part, I hope this underscores the fact that it’s Google that’s really playing PageRank investor, not the site owner. That’s also why many site owners, I feel, shouldn’t worry about sculpting. In addition, there are often far more useful things that can bring about changes (fixing bad page titles, obtaining quality external links, creating quality content).

But still — it’s hanging out there. Even with Google playing investor, the more links you have on your page, the more PageRank is going to be divided up among them. Having relatively fewer links might mean that the remaining ones get more credit. And if you’re an advanced SEO looking for some extra oomph, you might decide sculpting is still worth chasing.

Sculpting Without Nofollow

Certainly Google’s not putting people off that idea. While it’s taking nofollow off the table, it still talks about other methods of sculpting. From Matt’s video of May 23:

In the video, he says:

I would say that it’s not the first thing I would work on. I would work on getting more links, having higher quality content, those are always the sorts of things that you want to do first. But then if you have a certain amount of budgeted PageRank, you certainly can sculpt your PageRank. I wouldn’t necessarily do it with the nofollow tag …. but a better more effective form of PageRank sculpting is choosing, for example, which things to link to from your home page. So imagine that you have two different pages. You’ve got one product that earns you a lot of money every time someone buys, and you’ve got another product where you make, you know, 10 cents. You probably want to highlight this page [the one that earns a lot], you want to make sure it gets enough PageRank so it can rank well. So this is more likely to be a page you want to link to from your home page. So when people talk about PageRank sculpting, they tend to think nofollow and all that sort of stuff, but in some sense, the ways that you choose to create your site, your site architecture and how you link between your pages is a type of PageRank sculpting. So it’s certainly not unethical to have all the links come into your site, and you decide how to link within your site.”

Again, with the caveat that you’ve done all types of other important SEO, the bolded parts make it clear that sculpting is something that Google itself is saying may be effective. Google’s also saying that the more links you have, the less all the links benefit (hence Matt’s advice about carefully deciding what to feature on your home page). The only change is that supposedly, nofollow hasn’t been a way to filter out some of those links over the past year.

If that’s the case — and people still want to pursue sculpting, then I think we’ll see both a combination of folks being more selective about the links they put out on their pages and/or pursuing other methods of showing links but not having them count. A leading contender is the use of iframes. Using an iframe, someone could have comments appear within a blog post and yet not have any links in those comments get counted into the overall PageRank allocations.

Google Says: Yes, You Can Still Sculpt PageRank. No You Can’t Do It With Nofollow from Rand Fishkin over at SEOmoz gets into some of this a bit more. And the headline says it all. Rather than kill the idea of PageRank sculpting, I ironically find the recent kerfuffle is simply confirming it as something that advanced SEOs might want to think about.

The further irony is, if you believe Google, then SEOs who’ve been using nofollow and saying it’s given them boosts over the past year are all messed up. It wasn’t helping them at all. That would have knocked the wind out of those sails if Google had also said number of links doesn’t matter. But Google is saying number of links matter — it is saying sculpting might have an impact — so rather than the concept of sculpting getting knocked on its butt, it instead gets a helping hand back up, courtesy of Google.

For related commentary, see Techmeme.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Features: Analysis | Google: SEO | How To: SEO | Top News

Sponsored


About The Author: is a Founding Editor of Search Engine Land. He’s a widely cited authority on search engines and search marketing issues who has covered the space since 1996. Danny also serves as Chief Content Officer for Third Door Media, which publishes Search Engine Land and produces the SMX: Search Marketing Expo conference series. He has a personal blog called Daggle (and keeps his disclosures page there). He can be found on Facebook, Google + and microblogs on Twitter as @dannysullivan.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • dyksta

    Hi Danny,

    Nice Post. I still have two big issues that aren’t quite answered by what I have read on this topic so far.

    1) I have a very large site that has a nice entry page where users can choose to view products by location (via a nice map) first and then product

    e.g. Amsterdam -> Electronics -> ipod

    or by product first and then narrow it by location.

    Electronics -> ipod -> Amsterdam

    While the usability of the map is great I used no follows to make sure that the spiders and page rank didn’t follow that path because a page of all Amsterdam products isn’t going to be that useful for a Google Search. Similarly if I have 10 different regions I don’t want 10 x Regional Electronics pages in the index. The final page is the exact same page regardless of whether you get there via the map or via the category structure, and that’s the page where I want all the juice.

    Now before the nofollow debate I could nofollow the links to the map pages however these pages do get links into the site, so I want to make sure all of this linking power still runs down to the Electronics -> ipod -> Amsterdam page. So that option is out of the question. I guess I could implement the map in iframes though the business case to do this would be hard to justify. Javascript isn’t an option as Google read that now too.

    It seems to me that the nofollow was the perfect solution but now I feel that I am powerless to do anything (I am also one of the people who will swear blind that this method did work and has still been working in the last year since GG’s supposed change)

    which brings me to my second question

    2) With the new revelations there must be an “optimal level” of links out of a page. Using the old analogy if we used to have $10 in, 10 links out, 5 nofollowed then the 5 followed links get $2 each. Now they get $1 and the rest of the money evaporates. This would lead me to believe that you should at least now have 10 links out. If the money is going to disappear anyway then why not follow those other 5 links. 11 links out would be too many but 10 is the optimal level where you use all the PR without reducing the strength of your other links. You really have nothing to lose. I see that Matt is stressing putting important links closer to the homepage but in a large company, when every department wants to put marketing activities, monetisation efforts, user notices etc etc onto the homepage this is not easy to do. As an SEO I want to give my users the information they are after when they search google. And that is relevant product. By using nofollows I could really control this, and yet still give all my other departments ability to link to “their stuff” from anywhere on the site … I could just whack a nofollow their links. Now it’s not so easy.

    I am currently one of those SEOs “a little bit unsure” what to do now.

    regards
    Luke

  • http://www.brickmarketing.com nickstamoulis

    Hi Danny, Great analysis on the Google Pagerank Sculpting issue…

    After reading your post and Matt’s post I feel the most important thing that newer people to SEO should think of is don’t be afraid of loosing pagerank by linking to another website. If the link helps a website owners user experience and provides natural value within the content and context of their site then there is not a problem…

    As always within SEO, when something starts to work well for some people then folks tend to overdue it when there is hype that something really works well or better than something else…other areas of SEO hype years ago: link exchanging, paid links and pagerank sculpting and of course the ever popular pagerank chasers, etc.

    Anyway, this is just another SEO fad come and gone…:o)

  • http://arthurofsun arthurofsun

    The part of this article that my teams live by – and how we approach PageRank sculpting – is that there are ‘layers” of SEO tactics that can improve rankings for specific keywords, and that PageRank sculpting is about more than just nofollow tags.

    In my experience, PageRank sculpting with nofollow tags is a later “layer” after all the more basic and impactful PageRank sculpting activities – which includes very conscious and well thought-trh\\hrough use of internal crosslinking and development of external deep links through either associated sites which the customer controls or which are owned by friendly partners.

    Once that groundwork is laid and the results are known from that activity, PageRank sculpting through nofollow tags can then be used to fine tune specific pages. And we’ll probably continue to recommend it, even with the changes Matt described. The reason for this is that while an individual page may not get improvement from focusing on specific outbound/inbound link pairs, the pruning and weeding of the overall site will focus attention/PageRank on the core pages we want indexed. By allowing PageRank to flow over a smaller but core number of pages, we raise the PageRank of the entire site through more strongly focused PageRank feedback loops.

  • http://www.positracker.com PosiTracker

    Personally I believe there’s always a good dose of misdirection coming from Cutts, after all his job is to thwart some of out attempts to work the system.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide