“See No Evil” Is No Way For Big Companies To Deal With Search Spam

It started innocently enough. A client, whom I’ll refer to as BigCo, asked a question about the success that one of their divisions was having with a different search consulting company. I wasn’t familiar with the company, so I asked a few questions and then started to investigate them. What I found disturbed me.

It was breathtakingly clear that the secret to success was blatant black hat spamming techniques. This wasn’t some kind of borderline “it depends on how you interpret it” situation. No, BigCo was being assisted by companies paying for links and even posting references of other companies it had “helped” right on its website. At this point, I knew what I had to do.

My client, who worked in the TinyProduct Division of BigCo, listened impassively as I recited all the problem areas that I had found and made sure that the impact on BigCo’s search marketing was understood. I expected my client to spring into action, but instead, the response was closer to, “That’s a shame. It really seems like that stuff is working for them.”

Clearly I had my work cut out for me here. I tried again to explain the dangers of spam—how the moment the search engines detect any spam techniques, BigCo runs the risk of losing everything it has worked so hard to achieve in its search program. Not to mention the embarrassment that the bad publicity could cause (anyone remember the big headlines when BMW was banned by Google?)

My arguments seemed to be working. My client realized that there was too much risk here to pursue these kinds of tactics. So, I asked how I could be of help in working with the BigCo’s offending division, and was told that no help was needed. “So, you can get this stopped on your own?” I asked.

“It’s really none of my business,” my client replied.

Uh oh. I was running into one of the biggest problems in large companies today, the “not my job” syndrome. It’s natural, actually. I mean, human beings really weren’t built for organizations as large as a Fortune 500 company. Our tribal instincts force us to identify with a smaller group than that.

The problem is that we are challenged by these large organizations to outstrip what our instincts have prepared us for. I know it’s hard. I know that it doesn’t feel natural. Or normal. But we have to help our entire company, no matter how big it is, to succeed.

It feels overwhelming at times. I mean, how can any one person make the difference in an organization of thousands of people. It’s understandable—no, it’s inevitable—that we retreat from that kind of awesome responsibility. Unfortunately, that retreat is what all of the other employees in BigCo are doing, too. And when they do, we end up in this difficult situation where someone knows what’s wrong, but is actively deciding not to do anything about it. And no one else does anything about it, either.

The problem with all of this, to bring us back to our original problem, is that Google will do something about it. No, maybe not today, but someday. Someday, Google will figure out what’s going on. Someday Google will identify exactly what kind of trickery is afoot here. And when they do, it won’t be pretty.

Because, you see, Google doesn’t really care which division of BigCo was the offender. Google really isn’t interested in whether your division was at fault or not. BigCo gets penalized, across the board. So, one dopey decision by one person at BigCo can bring down the whole company. And, though it seems collegial to allow freedom of action on the part of your fellow employees, what they do affects you and your little tribe, not just some abstract corporation.

And if this was only about spam, maybe it wouldn’t be that important. I mean, even the cautionary tale of BMW’s spamming ended happily. They weren’t banned very long. It really didn’t turn out to be that big a deal.

No, the bigger problem is the way that we all perform this kind of mental gymnastics in our big companies every day, not just when it comes to search, but when it comes to our customers. We look the other way when BigProduct Division screws our customers, because we are not responsible for what they do—we can only control what we do in TinyProducts.

But, in the end, it doesn’t work out that way. Because everything anyone does at BigCo reflects on BigCo. And everyone outside of BigCo looks at the whole company through one lens, whether it is Google or our customers. Until we decide that it is up to us to confront our fellow employees on bad behavior, we shouldn’t expect our corporate ethics to be any better than they’ve been.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Features: Analysis | SEO: Spamming


About The Author: is an author, public speaker, and consultant on Internet marketing for clients worldwide, and serves as Chief Strategist for Converseon. His books include Search Engine Marketing, Inc. and Do It Wrong Quickly.

Connect with the author via: Email


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.raisemyrank.com/ Bob Gladstein

    I wish I could agree with you. I absolutely hate to see spam succeed, but it does.

    I received an RFP last week from a small company who pointed out to me that one of their competitors was seriously dominating their SERPs. I took a look, and saw right away that this competitor had been buying links. It was pretty tough to miss.

    I wrote back that if they wanted to try fighting with fire, I wasn’t the person to help them, because this is something I refuse to do, and it could end up harming them more than it could help. But could I guarantee that their competitor was going to get caught? No.

    In the case you cite in the article… I don’t know. If BigCo is really big, then the BMW example is even more valid. Yes, they got banned. But as you note, the ban didn’t last very long. Big brands may have more revenue to lose, but what search engine is willing to return a page of results that doesn’t include a given big brand in response to a search for the name of that brand? That other department at BigCo may be well aware of the risk. They may also feel pretty secure that should something terrible happen, a humble apology and some quick editing will fix everything.

    It’s the small companies that are risking everything when they try to deceive the search engines, but we’d have a much easier time of dissuading them from taking that risk if there weren’t so many examples out there of such techniques paying off.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide