If Google Is The New Microsoft, Facebook Is The New Google

One can guess that Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak probably doesn’t “Like” Facebook anymore, the website that now topples governments. (I apologize but I couldn’t resist.) Back in the US the Facebook enemies or, more precisely, “frenemies list” is also growing says a piece in the the Wall Street Journal.

The article discusses Facebook’s broad ambitions and how the social site competes with a growing number of companies as it reaches out into more and more areas:

As the seven-year-old company ramps up its hiring and adds new features to its social network, it is disrupting the businesses of established companies like Yahoo Inc. and Google Inc. and putting even more Internet firms on notice. Facebook, which has more than 600 million users and was valued at $50 billion in a recent funding round, is grabbing online-advertising from Yahoo, Myspace and others.

Among the companies named in the article that are now in the Facebook frenemies camp are Google, Microsoft, Zynga, eBay/PayPal, Yahoo, Groupon, Apple, MySpace, Yelp, AOL, Twitter and others.

While Google in many ways has taken the place of Microsoft (certainly in the anti-trust attentions of Europe), Facebook has now moved into the hot/feared space that Google occupied for a number of years.

It’s “natural” and predictable that concern arises as companies become powerful and disruptive. That’s what happened with Google and it’s happening increasingly with Facebook.

Facebook’s explicit ambition is to inject itself into the center of all “conversations” happening online, between people and between brands, institutions and their customers and users. And that will inevitably be “disruptive” to many established companies and ways of doing business.

So far most companies have happily adopted Facebook as a social or “conversational” marketing platform and publishers have leveraged Connect to extend their visibility and reach. But over time that could shift if Facebook is seen as asserting its interests or its brand too strongly. In addition the privacy controversies that have dogged Facebook for several years are likely to gain renewed attention as formal privacy regulations and legislation emerge in 2011 or 2012.

How would Facebook Ads perform if users are given the option to “opt-out” of all targeting for example? That’s probably going to be required at some point. And many users remain somewhat confused about who sees what and what gets transmitted to third parties via Connect and instant personalization.

Facebook is a revolutionary platform, much more than Google in some respects. For example, a small mobile security firm Gemalto just put Facebook on a SIM card enabling nearly all mobile handsets that don’t already access Facebook to access Facebook. There are 5 billion mobile subscribers in the world. Effectively that’s now Facebook’s “addressable market.”

As the company moves toward an IPO in 2012 and then starts to ramp up monetization (as public companies inevitably must) it will almost certainly encroach on more companies and their models — just as Google has.

Related Topics: Channel: Social | Facebook | Features: Analysis


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Profits.im

    I’m curious to know – on what do you base your statement that all Facebook users will probably be required to opt-out of ads at some point? We’ve haven’t had the option to opt out of all ads on Google yet – do you foresee a day coming where that happens as well?

    A company has to be allowed to make money – Facebook shouldn’t have to stop showing us ads any more than any other site does, unless we all want to pay a monthly membership fee to access our Facebook accounts. How do we expect them to earn money?

    If you do have some reason to believe that there will be a forced opt out, at least back that statement up with something, such as the recent concern over behavioral targeting and if there is a bill in committee currently about that, etc. Helps to bolster your case.

  • http://www.hayneedle.com Bret Dennis

    I agree with the commenter above, as those were my exact thoughts as I read the article. Why would Facebook be required to give users the option to opt-out of targeted advertising?

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide