Open Letter To EU Competition Commissioner Exerts Pressure For Tougher “Vertical Search” Settlement With Google

google-eu-featuredLate last week, a group of Google critics, rivals and complainants sent an “open letter” to EU competition commissioner Joaquín Almunia asking him to focus on the “vertical search” or “search neutrality” dimensions of the Google antitrust case. The letter says, essentially, that of the “four areas of concern” raised by the EU over Google’s business practices, this is the only issue that really matters.

The letter asserts that the EU must address “Google’s search manipulation practices” in the form of “the systematic promotion of Google’s own services, and the systematic demotion or exclusion of its competitors’ services.” The signatories worry that any settlement that emerges won’t be sufficiently tough on Google.

They’re specifically concerned about a potential “labeling” approach that identifies Google search products or properties (e.g., Travel, Shopping/Products, Maps) as such but without also limiting Google’s ability or discretion regarding how it presents those results. They see such an approach as purely symbolic and, thus, meaningless.

The open letter is part of a campaign of increasing public pressure (or “shaming,” if you like) directed toward European regulators, but Almunia in particular, to compel him to take a hard line or look soft.

The FTC settled earlier this year with Google and declined to pursue the “search neutrality” question because US law would have made it very difficult for the agency to win on that issue. The EU, arguably, has more discretion in this area than did US regulators.

Commissioner Almunia himself has explicitly said that there will need to be some concessions from Google on vertical search (or “diversion of traffic“). He previously stated, “In general search results, Google displays links to its own vertical search services differently than it does for links to competitors. We are concerned that this may result in preferential treatment compared to those of competing services, which may be hurt as a consequence.”

The EU is currently studying Google’s settlement proposal, but indicated that there probably wouldn’t be any decision or action until after August, when much of Europe takes a holiday.

Below is the full text of the March 21 letter:

Dear Vice-President Almunia,

RE: COMP/C-3/39.740 – Foundem / Google and associated cases

We are writing to express our common views on the European Commission’s ongoing settlement negotiations with Google. The Commission opened proceedings more than two years ago, and we are becoming increasingly concerned that effective and future-proof remedies might not emerge through settlement discussions alone.

The first point we would like to raise is that the anti-competitive impact of search manipulation far outweighs the Commission’s three other areas of concern regarding Google’s business practices. In addition to materially degrading the user experience and limiting consumer choice, Google’s search manipulation practices lay waste to entire classes of competitors in every sector where Google chooses to deploy them.

The second point we would like to raise is that there are two equally important aspects to Google’s search manipulation practices: the systematic promotion of Google’s own services, and the systematic demotion or exclusion of its competitors’ services. Any effective remedies will require explicit commitments to end both aspects; remedying one without remedying the other would simply allow Google to recalibrate the un-remedied practice in order to achieve the same or equivalent anti-competitive effect.

Thirdly, we are convinced that Google’s strict adherence to the following overarching principle would ensure an end to both aspects of Google’s search manipulation practices:

Google must be even-handed. It must hold all services, including its own, to exactly the same standards, using exactly the same crawling, indexing, ranking, display, and penalty algorithms.

We will respectfully withhold judgment on Google’s proposed commitments until we have seen them, but Google’s past behaviour suggests that it is unlikely to volunteer effective, future-proof remedies without being formally charged with infringement. Given this, and the fact that Google has exploited every delay to further entrench, extend, and escalate its anti-competitive activities, we urge the Commission to issue the Statement of Objections.

Yours sincerely,

Shivaun Raff, CEO and Co-Founder, Foundem

Helmut Verdenhalven, Director Government Relations, BDZV Federation of German Newspaper Publishers

Dr. h.c. Hans Biermann, Chief Executive Officer, Euro-Cities AG

Brent Thompson, Senior Vice President Government and Corporate Affairs, Expedia Inc.

Michael Weber, Managing Director, Hot Maps Medien GmbH

Kate Sutton, Director, Streetmap EU Ltd

Seth Kalvert, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, TripAdvisor

Bastien Duclaux, CEO and co-Founder, Twenga

Dr. Christoph Fiedler, Managing Director European Affairs and Media Policy, VDZ German Federation of Magazine Publishers

Heiko Hanslik, President, VfT Verband freier Telefonbuch und Auskunftsmedien e.V. (Association of Independent Directory Publishers)

Robert Maier, Founder and Managing Director, Visual Meta GmbH

Related Topics: Channel: Industry | Google: Antitrust | Google: Critics | Google: Legal | Google: Outside US | Legal: Regulation | Top News

Sponsored


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Durant Imboden

    Maybe I’m missing something, but why WOULDN’T Google be expected to favor its own services? (I don’t see Bing giving equal treatment to Google in a search on “Venice maps” or TripAdvisor giving equal treatment to my site in a search on “Paris hotels.”)

  • http://twitter.com/YoungbloodJoe Joe Youngblood

    My only question is this: if Microsoft bundling IE with Windows was anti-trust / anti-competitive in Europe, why is iPhone bundling a browser and Android doing the same NOT considered anti-competitive? Or Chrome on Chromebooks, etc..?

  • http://twitter.com/YoungbloodJoe Joe Youngblood

    Also, Google instantaneously crawls and indexes new YouTube videos, so I guess that would violate this?

  • bernhardruge55cy

    my roomate’s sister makes $67 hourly on the computer. She has been fired for 8 months but last month her paycheck was $12642 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more on  Ask25.c­om

  • http://ftc.gov/ MonopolizedSearch

    At least the EU does not seem to be as weak and ineffective as the FTC. Personally, I think the FTC has become too bloated to carry out its core mission. With all of the red ink flowing in Washington D.C., I think lawmakers should consider shutting down the FTC and replacing it with a leaner agency that has more defined regulatory powers. Of course all existing FTC employees could apply for new positions within the agency, but I personally would not hire one of them.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide