Everything you need to know about SEO, delivered every Thursday.
Google Releases New Link Reporting Tools
For years, Google’s
link: command (and see
here) has deliberately failed to show all the links to a website. This came
out of Google’s fear that site owners simply wanted the data to try and
manipulate rankings — which was pretty true.
Instead, they only provided a
sampling of backlinks. Today, that changes.
Google Webmaster Central is
rolling out new support allowing you to view and even download thousands of
links to your site (official news
You still won’t get absolutely all the links Google knows about. In
particular, links to any of your pages contained in Google’s
supplemental index won’t be shown. But despite this, the amount of links
reported will likely be massive compared to the “regular” link lookup command.
For example, consider this query:
That’s showing about 3,000 links to the
Search Engine Land web site (note,
for some people, you might see no results, due to an apparent glitch). In
contrast, the new system within Google Webmaster Central reports to me that I
have 57,000 links pointing my way. From 3,000 to 57,000 links — what a different the new system makes!
Why make the shift?
“Webmasters have been wanting more comprehensive link data from us for a long
time,” said Vanessa Fox, product manager for Google Webmaster Central. “We
created Webmaster Central to communicate better with webmasters and we take
their feedback very seriously. We have been looking at ways to provide this data
and are ecstatic to make it available.”
Fox added that Google is also more comfortable releasing the data because it
is going only to specific site owners, rather than to the world at large. In
other words, site owners establish a relationship with Google when they verify
through the Google Webmaster Central system. That lets Google show them more
information individually but keeps information about all sites hidden from those
who might try to misuse the data in some way.
What links can you get and how do you obtain them?
The post about the change on the
Official Google Webmaster
Central Blog is pretty comprehensive (a brief mention on the official Google
here), but I’ll go through what it covers and
dive in deeper to the system as well.
The New Links Tab
To access the data, you have to be verified Google Webmaster Central user.
That’s explained more
here, and it’s easy to do.
Once verified, select the site you want to view from the My Sites screen.
Then when that site loads, you’ll see a new “Links” tab when you log in like this:
(Note: if you don’t see the tab yet, keep checking. Everyone should be
getting it sometime today).
That tab allows you to see either External or Internal links through January
15 of this month. Google expects to update the data going forward on a monthly
are what most people are concerned about — who is linking to your site?
Note that some people operate subdomains. Links from those domains aren’t
considered “external.” For example, a site at “mysite.com” might have all these
Because they all use the same root domain, as I’ve bolded, any links
from a subdomain to the main domain will not be considered external. Also,
any links to a subdomain (such as shoes.mysite.com) will be
counted as part of those reported for mysite.com.
What if you want to see links for just a particular subdomain? No problem —
you should be able to verify each subdomain and then run a specific report on
By the way, Blogspot and WordPress users — if you don’t have your own
domain, then any links to your site from another site within those domains won’t
be counted as external links. This is true for anyone using the domain owned by someone else. Just
another reason to be master of your own domain in both of those places, which is
easily done, as our 25
Tips To Optimize Your Blog For Readers & Search Engines from last month
The External Links To Pages Screen
By default, each page of your site is listed by directory, then
alphabetically, with a link count next to it. For example:
In the screenshot above, notice how my root URL is listed first, then the pages
are listed alphabetically (well, numerically — and if you wonder why we use
that number scheme at Search Engine Land, see
Movable Type & Rebuild Safe URLs).
Here’s another example of how page listing works:
Unfortunately, I think it would be better if pages were sorted by those
getting the most links to them, so that you could easily see the most linked to
pages within your site. This might come in the future, the Google Webmaster
Central team says. In the
meantime, there are ways to do this yourself by downloading the data, as I’ll
cover in a bit.
To see links for any page, click on the link count number for that page. That will let you
drill-down to see just links pointing at that specific page.
Want to warp speed to a particular page without having to scroll to it
through the page list? Use the “Find a page” link at the top of the list. That
will open up to give you an entry box like this:
From there, just enter the remaining part of your page address. That will
shoot you right to data on that particular page.
Listing Links For A Page
However you get to a particular page, drilling down will show you all the
links pointing to it, like this:
I’d actually like to
see the “first found” date be shown rather than the “last found” date, which I’ll revisit in a moment. But first, an
important difference between how the Yahoo Site Explorer tool gives you links
versus the new Google tool.
Want to see all the links for an entire site, rather than links to just a
specific page? At Yahoo, you set “Show Inlinks” to the “Entire Site”
setting to generate a report showing all the actual links to that site (more about this in Yahoo’s
here). You can then view up to a maximum of 1,000 links online.
Google gives you an overall site link count but does NOT let you see all the
links, as you can with Yahoo. You can only see links to particular pages.
For example, look again at this screenshot:
See how the “All Pages” row
says that there are about 57,212 links to Search Engine Land? Underneath that is
line, with a link count of 25,841 links. Those are the links pointing
directly at the home page of the site (http://searchengineland.com/), not ALL links pointing anywhere at the
site overall (searchengineland.com).
What if you do want to see all the links from an entire web site? Easy —
download them. Look at the bottom of the table, and you’ll see this:
Note the two options:
- Download this table
- Download all external links
Downloading will let you get far more than the 1,000 links limit that Yahoo
lets you view online or download. However, be aware that for some sites, Google will export more than the 65,536 rows of
information that spreadsheets like Excel can handle. In those cases, you’ll
either have to have another way to massage the data or you’ll need to download
data for specific pages, which will reduce the amount.
What’s in the download? Three bits of information:
- Page getting the link
- Link to that page
- Last found date (Yahoo doesn’t show this)
Remember above when I wished for a first found date? That’s because with it,
it would be easy to plot a “link growth” chart for a site. For example, consider
What I did was download my link data, then use Excel to make a subtotal of
the number of links found for each particular day. This starts from about late
November when we launched and runs through mid-January. You can see how the
links for our new site begin to ramp up and then skyrocket.
The only problem is that these are “last found” figures. That means they
don’t properly show growth. Google may find a link on day in early January, then
revisit and “find” it again in late January, which would cause the “growth”
spurt to happen later than when it first appeared.
First found dates would solve this. It would make it possible to plot the
growth of links for a site accurately over a time and provide a sort of link EKG
or link trend that would be helpful to site owners.
Indeed, Google could take it a step further. If people wanted to, Google
might allow them to share a growth trend with the world. It could even be done
by letting people put a badge or widget on their site that when clicked took
people out to see their link growth curve, similar to how
Alexa stats are provided to sites like this
chart for Search Engine Land:
Of course, Alexa’s stats already come
under fire as
being open to manipulation by site owners. Using link count numbers certainly
would also be open to gaming. You’d only need to create a bunch of sites that
link to your site to make yourself seem popular.
Last week, Yahoo
rolled out its own
link badge showing overall link counts, rather than trends, so potentially
that gaming will already begin. People might begin building links just to make
the Yahoo figures seem even higher.
To really illustrate how the raw link counts tell nothing, consider this tiny
snapshot from my own link report:
Those are nearly 50 links to the same
article as Search
Engine Land from Techmeme. Because of
how Techmeme works,
even though the article was linked to once in the Techmeme coverage day, the
various iterations of the Techmeme home page keep linking to it over and over
If you do a trend chart (or even a count), should these “links” be
consolidated into one? How about links from a blogroll? And should you count
links from sites that are clearly trying to game the system or from
One thought is to perhaps count links (and show trends) only for links above
a certain PageRank
level, for information shown to the public. That might help reduce some of the
gaming but also allow site owners to take part in having fun widgets like Yahoo
just rolled out.
Google said they’re considering the link widget idea. It was something I was
actually discussing with the Google Webmaster Central team during a visit last
week before the Yahoo badge came out, so minds across the web clearly in in the
right mindset. We’ll see, going forward.
Overall, I’m thrilled to get this new information from Google. I’ve never
felt getting just raw links alone was ever that useful to a site owner. A list
of links — especially a list of thousands of links — tells you nothing. What
are the most important links, the links from the highest trafficked site, and so
on? You need that type of information along with the list for it to be useful.
Google’s new link release doesn’t solve that problem, from a marketing
perspective. However, it does set things up for site owners to perhaps get more
useful associated data like “first found” dates in the
future, along with other ideas that could prove useful in using links as a measure of your site’s health. In
addition, it helps solve a
long-standing problem for Google, that of site owners nagging that Google
doesn’t show them all their links. Well, now you’ve got lots of them,
Postscript Barry: Philipp reports that there is a bug with the tool where you can get linkage data for sites that you do not run (i.e. sites that you cannot verify). He proves that he was able to get all of Google’s links but he would not provide the specifics on how the bug works, for obvious reasons. I am sure this will be patched soon, I hope.