BBC Report: Google Admits Accepting Illegal AdWords In The UK

Ads for illegal Olympic ticket resellers, ads for cannabis, and ads for fake identification cards and UK passports. All illegal, but all could, up until recently, be found on, according to a British Broadcasting Company (BBC) investigation publicized today. Though Google shut down the illegal advertisers when the matter was brought to the company’s attention by the BBC, it profited from the ads while they appeared and kept the money, according to the report.

The story is bound to sound familiar. Google recently agreed to pay a $500 million penalty to the U.S. Department of Justice to settle charges it knowingly accepted ads from Canadian pharmacies illegally selling to American customers. The company admitted wrongdoing and agreed to government monitoring to ensure it wouldn’t happen again. Back in 2007, Google paid $3 million in a similar case involving illegal gambling ads, in which Yahoo and Microsoft paid even more significant penalties.

The BBC investigation stemmed from a consumer who tried to buy Olympics tickets from an unauthorized reseller, LiveOlympicTickets, believing that a company that came up first in Google’s advertising results had to be legitimate. When LiveOlympicTickets asked her to fax in a copy of her signature to finalize the sale, she began to be suspicious and contacted the BBC investigative reporters.

“It was a sponsored ad at the top of the page, so we presumed it was a trusted official site,” the victim told the BBC, “and we spent £750 on two tickets for my mum and dad to see the 1500m, which is what my dad really wanted.”

Though UK police apparently also contacted Google, according to the report, the ads for LiveOlympicTickets continued to appear for more than a week after that, the BBC report said, until the investigative reporters contacted the search company.

This latest dust-up highlights a perennial problem at Google. Though the company uses both algorithmic and human filters to try to weed out illegal advertising, it seems that some of the noxious AdWords inevitably make it through. Even more problematic is the fact that Google appears to have a conflict of interest, because it profits from the very ads it says it’s trying hard to police. And the dollar amounts in question are not inconsequential. The $500 million penalty it paid in the DOJ illegal pharmacy case was estimated to be the value of what Google earned from the ads, along with the amount earned by the pharmacies.

Related Topics: Channel: SEM | Google: AdWords | Top News


About The Author: is Executive Features Editor at Search Engine Land and Marketing Land. She’s a well-respected authority on digital marketing, having reported and written on the subject since 1998.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Charles Willcock

    Sadly the BBC is not always that interested in accuracy itself. In the UK the leading radio breakfast programme is the Today Programme which is essential listening for the Prime Minister downwards. The PM is an occasional guest interview and anyone who is anyone accepts an invitation to put there point of view across. When Grant Shapps a Government Minister was on the programme he mixed up hits with unique visitors when commenting about how successful a Government website was. As anyone in search engine marketing knows the number of hits a server received is always many times greater than the number of unique visitors but of course many listeners to the programme would not be aware of that.
    I emailed the programme suggesting that they issue a statement correcting the fact but never had a reply so listeners were left with the impression that a Government website was probably at least 10 times more popular than was actually the case. (Therefore, the justification for spending more money on it was not actually as strong as the argument being advanced by Grant Shapps).
    Charles Willcock

  • Tim Watt

    I complained about offensive and probably illegal drug adsense ads on a sports site I ran – with detailed correspondence still in my files – from 11- 13 August 2003.
    I had to escalate from a form reply, and was promised my concern would be taken up by a ‘team of specialists for further investigation’.
    I Never heard further it seems – though subsequently there was an option to exclude types of advertisers though not for a while after then.

  • yung josh

    $500 million in fines for “what they earned PLUS what the pharmacy earned” thats crazy!!

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide