• Derrick Hicks

    I wonder how Google treats the sites that are “linking” to these urls? For instance, what would happen on a forum that has tons of user generated content. If they strip out all external links and just leave the text, Google wouldn’t “ding” the site publishing the “link” If users are promoting a “bad neighborhood” would they? It’s not a link so to say, but if Google is crawling that forum and then finding all of this text pointing to spammy sites, could that hurt the “linking” site? Thoughts?

  • Durant Imboden

    Now, if only we could get credit when a major media site mentions our site without linking to it!

  • Andrew SEO

    I believe Google is graphing all keywords just like links and using correlation between the keywords as a ranking factor. This is just the tip! Nice report Barry!

  • http://www.seo-theory.com/ Michael Martinez

    No, they’ve said they crawl unlinked URLs in the past.

  • http://www.irishwonder.com IrishWonder

    I believe they did mention before that unlinked mentions on authority sites do carry some sort of weight, not seen anything about actual crawling though

  • Peter Watson

    That would be nice. I think this is the direction they are heading in.

  • http://www.seo-theory.com/ Michael Martinez

    I don’t know about that but I’m surprised to see this come up as news. I thought everyone remembered that Google will crawl all sorts of things “for discovery”.

  • David Edwards

    Hey Bazza. I did a whitepaper on the different ways Google can discover URLs a while back that discovered this also. There were some interesting takeaways from it, if you want to check it out – http://www.clickconsult.com/whitepapers/Click_Consult_How_Does_Google_Discover_New_URLs_Whitepaper.pdf

  • SEO Expert – Rahul Trivedi

    I have to try this one

  • Scott Davis

    In the situation you’ve described, they’re not links.

  • Erik Dafforn

    John left a pretty similar comment here in 2011 in a thread about plain-text links:
    http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/21359/how-does-google-treat-unlinked-urls
    “Given that we find links in all kinds of places and are primarily using them to discover unknown URLs, I wouldn’t worry about whether or not they pass PageRank.”

    We’ve seen plain-text (i.e., no “href”) links show up in GWT “Links to your site” reports for a while, so it’s disappointing (but not surprising, I suppose) that they’re not passing PageRank. For many sites, it’s just as valid a way to “endorse” a site as an href link, but the publisher (or CMS) may not be savvy enough to make it hot.

  • Morgan Akchehirlian

    I think like directories,forums are going to be 100% dead than. About 70% forums have tons of links and I am sure if this is the case the communities and blogs are going to hurt so badly.
    They hate spam but still index it?Strange but no solution.Surely the sites getting links from these forums are the first one to get affected by it.
    indirect citations and citations will than be really helpful.

  • Morgan Akchehirlian

    I think like directories,forums are going to be 100% dead than. About 70% forums have tons of links and I am sure if this is the case the communities and blogs are going to hurt so badly.
    They hate spam but still index it?Strange but no solution.Surely the sites getting links from these forums are the first one to get affected by it.
    indirect citations and citations will than be really helpful.

  • Derrick Hicks

    Hey Scott! Yep, I understand that they are not links. That’s why I called them “links”. :)

  • http://www.wigsalon.com/ Mike Aronesty

    Pretty sure they track urls via js widget codes as well. I’m curious how this gets… Google definitely picks up on the links though. Oh and they have been tracking non linked website mentions for a long time… At least a year or two.

    When penguin 1 happened, there was a domain with 10,000+ non linked mentions of one of my domains. It was the primary cause of the penalty, and once fixed they put me back. Again – These did not have href’s, the and was not a link … simply something like this http :// http://www.xyz. com