Obama Is “Failure” At Google & “Miserable Failure” At Yahoo


Yahoo - Miserable Failure

I told you so. Or I told anyone who cared. I even tried to reach the Obama administration in four or five different ways. Do a search on Yahoo right now for miserable failure, and you’ll find President Barack Obama’s page ranking either in the top spot or the second spot. Given a redirect that Obama’s web team has put into place, he should solidify into that number one spot over time. Eventually, Microsoft’s Live Search should reflect that, as well. And over at Google, Obama will likely gain a top page listing for a search on failure.

I know. There are bigger issues Obama has to deal with. But then again, this is supposed to be the tech-savvy presidency. It should be search engine optimization savvy, as well.

What happened? If you want the long version, see my Bush: Fix Your “Miserable Failure” Googlebomb Legacy Before Obama Takes Office article from earlier this month. It documents how people “Googlebombed” George W. Bush’s biography to rank tops for searches on “miserable failure” at Google and other search engines.

Bush’s web team tried to kill that bomb by redirecting any request for Bush’s biography to a page for all US presidents. I had a slight hope that when the new White House site went up, the bomb might permanently be defused because of how the site was failing to redirect requests for many pages properly (for more on the new White House site’s issues with redirection, see my follow-up article, Despite Inauguration, Google & Others Still Think It’s President Bush, Not President Obama plus Vanessa Fox’s article Making Site Architecture Search-Friendly: Lessons From whitehouse.gov).

Well, they’re redirecting now. Any request for Bush’s old biography that was here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html

is now being redirected to Obama’s biography here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/president_obama/

For the real tech nerds out there, the redirect is a 301 “permanent” one, which means the White House is explicitly telling search engines that the old Bush biography has now been permanently replaced by Barack Obama’s page.

As a result, Obama now inherits all the links containing anchor text with the words “miserable failure” in them. IE, all those links are acting as votes saying that Obama should rank well for those words.

Ugh. Over at Google, almost exactly two years ago, they put in a fix to solve the Googlebombing issue. That dropped Bush out of the top results for those two words (and thus is still keeping Obama out), but then he came back up for the single word failure. That seemed down to Bush’s brief use of the word “failure” on the page (George W. Bush: A Failure Once Again, According To Google explains this more), and once the word was no longer used, it stopped ranking for it — at least until recently.

I noticed earlier this month that the Bush page was once again ranking for “failure,” even though Google’s Googlebomb fix was supposed to prevent this. I never heard back from Google after contacting them informally about why this was happening. And it’s still going on:

Google - Failure

Notice how Google is still reporting that the page is about Bush, listed in position three. That’s because it has yet to process the redirect. Because that page redirects to Obama’s page, as with Yahoo, it’s going to inherit all the failure love.

I’m glad the White House has put redirects in place. As I pointed out, the lack of them meant many people trying to find biographies of past presidents such as George Washington were going to get errors. And it’s understandable that it would take them some time to get them in place. My assumption is that on Inauguration Day, the old site was completely removed and the new prebuilt site was installed, with the redirects being something they figured they’d quickly process in the coming days. (Plus, consider the technological “dark ages” they’re found after moving into the White House).

Still, the redirect they are doing is hurting Obama plus not helping those who are still trying to find Bush’s biography where it actually lives. So repeating myself from what I said earlier this month, here’s what should happen:

First:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html

Should be 301 redirected here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/georgewbush/

That will fix the bomb. More important, that’s where Bush’s biography is actually located. There are people who linked to the old address for his biography for non-political reasons. They should be redirected to the correct location.

Next, this page:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/biography.html

was where Bush’s biography moved to when his staff tried to solve the bomb. Rather than point at Obama’s page (as it does now), it should point to this page for all US presidents:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/

The good news is that doing this shouldn’t cause the page for all US presidents to suffer the past Googlebomb. In addition, anyone who bookmarked Bush’s biography under this generic URL can still find it as part of a list of all US presidents.

In other news, I’d earlier covered how the White House wasn’t using the NOODP tag, which meant that Google was listing the White House home page in some cases as if Bush was still in office. The White House still hasn’t made use of that tag, but after Google noticed the issue, they fixed it on their end.

Meanwhile, Yahoo is finally reflecting the new occupant of the White House in its own listings. That leaves Microsoft as the last of the major search engines to still think Bush is in office there:

Live Search - White House

After two days, I’d have expected Microsoft to have recrawled the home page and reflect an updated listing by now. I’m pretty sure it won’t be much longer until that’s fixed.

Meanwhile, if the White House would like to learn more about redirection, I’d highly recommend attending our 301 Redirect, How Do I Love You? Let Me Count The Ways session at SMX West, Search Engine Land’s search marketing conference running from Feb. 10-12. I’d even be happy to provide a ticket, subject to whatever government rules allow :)

Postscript: As noted in the comments below, a new Googlebomb more positive for Obama is now happening, where he’s ranking for cheerful achievement (see here and here for more)

Postscript 2 (Jan. 23, 7:30am Pacific): As predicted, Obama’s page is now ranking number one for failure at Google:

Google - Failure

Postscript 3 (Jan. 23, 8:30am Pacific): Microsoft is now showing an updated description for the White House home page that reflects Obama being in office.

Postscript 4 (Jan. 23, 2:30pm Pacific): Related coverage is begining. See Techmeme, the Wall Street Journal, MediaPost, UPI, the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times.

Postscript 5 (Jan. 23, 3:50pm Pacific): Obama no longer ranks for “failure” on Google. The White House hasn’t changed anything. The link data that Google has been using to rank the Bush page — data inherited by Obama’s page — hasn’t changed. So the Googlebomb fix for this that hasn’t worked since earlier this month just happens to kick in a few hours after I post this article? That’s going to kick off another round of questioning over how “automated” that fix really is, as happened when Stephen Colbert briefly ranked for greatest living american.

Postscript 6 (Jan. 26, 8am Pacific): Google’s Matt Cutts has blogged on an official Google blog and his own blog about the issue, saying:

We do two different things — both of them algorithmic — to handle Googlebombs: detect Googlebombs and then mitigate their impact. The second algorithm (mitigating the impact of Googlebombs) is always running in our productionized systems. The first algorithm (detecting Googlebombs) has to process our entire web index, so in most typical cases we tend not to run that algorithm every single time we crawl new web data. I think that during 2008 we re-ran the Googlebomb detection algorithm 5-6 times, for example….

The defusing algorithm is running all the time, but the algorithm to detect Googlebombs is only run occasionally. We re-ran our algorithm last week and it detected both the [failure] and the [cheerful achievement] Googlebombs, so our system now minimizes the impact of those Googlebombs. Instead of a whitehouse.gov url, you now see discussion and commentary about those queries.

Reasonable enough, and Google’s said similar things before when new Googlebombs have emerged, then disappeared after attention.

But why did the “failure” Googlebomb come back? In comments on his blog, Matt wrote:

What happened there is we re-ran our algorithm in December 2008, and at that time the detection algorithm didn’t flag [failure] as a Googlebomb. We don’t claim that our detection algorithm is 100% perfect; for example, that can happen because the link structure of the web does change over time, as does how we crawl the web.

Over at Microsoft, neither the old Bush page nor the new Obama page are now ranking for miserable failure. The Bush page had been ranking for that. Why this no longer happens is unclear.

Postscript 7 (Jan. 30, 2pm): Just noticed that the White House now has implemented redirects as I suggested above. That means I’d expect to see the Obama bio drop for searches on “miserable failure” at Yahoo and Microsoft, where it currently shows (yes, it started again at Microsoft). When? I’d guess between a week and a month.

Postscript 8 (Feb 12, 11pm): Yahoo now shows Bush’s biography as number one for miserable failure, in place of where Obama was showing. At Microsoft, once again, neither the Bush or Obama pages are now ranking at all.



Danny Sullivan is editor-in-chief of Search Engine Land. He’s a widely cited authority on search engines and search marketing issues who has covered the space since 1996. Danny also oversees Search Engine Land’s SMX: Search Marketing Expo conference series, maintains a personal blog called Daggle and microblogs on Twitter as @dannysullivan.

See more articles by Danny Sullivan >


Share, Bookmark & Discuss This Article
More:


Keep Updated: News Via Email | News Via RSS Feed | News Via Twitter


See more stories like this in the Members Library! Check out the Features: Analysis, Link Building: Link Bombs, SEO: Redirects & Moving Sites, Search & Society: General, Top News sections of the Members Library where this story is filed. Members also get access to exclusive video content, a members-only weekly & monthly newsletter, plus more. Check out all the benefits!

15 COMMENTS ON Obama Is “Failure” At Google & “Miserable Failure” At Yahoo

Cohn,

“Cheerful Achievement” has also become a Googlebomb.



chiropractic,

Did some Wordtracker research and it doesn’t look like “miserable failure” is that frequently a searched term. Certainly not in comparison to highly searched “failure” terms like congestive heart failure or kidney failure. Maybe it won’t be long before someone else gets the Miserable Failure top position on Yahoo. Sorta makes a nice title for a book.



MacChick,

This is not even in the top 10 things to worry about. Seriously. Focus.



Danny Sullivan,

Probably not. I said that in my second paragraph. Then again, for those who care about search, I think it’s noteworthy. And yeah, for those who’ve bookmarked the old Bush biography and are trying to reach it, it’s not that absurd to think the new government should be competent enough to point at the right place.



why-did-you-delete-my-account,

Look, Danny,

just so you hear what I think (IMHO): deleting someone’s account because they disagree with you SUCKS.

Besides that: link-based search engines also SUCK.

WAKE UP, man!

Sheesh… — why do I even BOTHER?

OMG, IDK — I guess it’s RIDICULOUS.

At least 3 things need to happen:

1. Fix my account

2. Explain why you deleted it

3. Say what your policy moving forward is

Otherwise SearchEngineLand dot COM is a COMPLETE WASTE of time — maybe even a “miserable failure”!

LOL,

;D nmw



why-did-you-delete-my-account,

Oh, I get it: I overracted — This isn’t your sphinn.com site, so I guess I need to log in again.

Sorry for the misunderstanding — shifting back and forthe betwee 2 sites (with each site requiring a different login) is pretty confusing, though… :S

Matt Cutts, BTW: has good advice concerning domain names — see http://twitter.com/nmw/status/1141344050 + http://twitter.com/nmw/status/1141322595 (his advice regarding domains comes near the end, if I recall correctly)



VBP,

Wow, what will they say by his second week?

VBP



bidangle,

I am rather shocked that the Obama administration didn’t respond to your communications. Don’t they realize the investment of time you’ve spent on this? Probably more so than SMX West. OK… guilty, as I just wasted too much time reading and responding!



Dan Giancaterino,

Danny:

You said:

“Should be 301 redirected here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/georgehwbush/

Shouldn’t it be:

“Should be 301 redirected here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/georgewbush/

Instead? You want to link to #43, not #41.



Jonahstein,

Sadly, Google seems to have diffused the cheerful achievement bomb, since the whitehouse isn’t on the first 5 pages. Alas, like Google Bombs of the past, what is left over is all of the chatter about the bombing campaign, but the target itself is a crater at the top of the SERP



Danny Sullivan,

Dan, yes, thanks for catching that! I’ve updated it in the story.



cvos,

It will be interesting to see how Google deals with the O-bomb. There is clearly a deep Google connection to the current administration.

On an unrelated note, it makes me sad to see the whitehouse appears to be using a Windows web server, while Bush used Apache.
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=http://www.whitehouse.gov&probe=1



matterhornpat,

While bigger issues certainly exist for the Obama administration, this is an excellent example of how to, or how not to, handle 301’s.



asnider,

I don’t see the page in question anywhere in the first 5 pages of Google SERPs for [failure], even when signed out, but I’m looking at Google Canada so that may be why. I do, however, see the Yahoo! issue.

Obviously, this is not the biggest issue facing the Obama administration, I’m surprised the White House web team hasn’t managed to resolve this yet.



Ciarán Norris,

Just been looking at this and whilst they seem to have a 301 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html
to
http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/georgewbush/
they also seem to have a 302 going on from
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president
to
http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/president_obama/

I presume that this is the reason that he’s still ranking #2 on Yahoo for miserable failure




RECENT COMMENTS

  • robdwoods said " Are these "ads" being triggered the same way the product ads are? Is it through the Google Base feed"
  • Marcus C said " A much more pervasive problem is that the in-house web team seems to know very little about SEO prac"
  • Alistair Lattimore said " I wrote about Ask.com arbitrage spam back in September 2008 as well, it continued on long after I po"

See All »


FREE DAILY SEARCH NEWS RECAP!

Stay on top of all the search news with our daily summary, the SearchCap newsletter. View a sample ›

STAY CURRENT THROUGHOUT THE DAY

RSS Feeds

The Search Engine Land feed keeps you informed as news happens. SEE ALL FEEDS »

Upcoming Search Engine Land Conferences

Advertise With Us »

Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.


SMX Web Site » | SMX Difference » | SMX News »


Join us at an upcoming SMX event:

Search Marketing Now Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:


See more webcast topics »

TRACK US SOCIALLY
Upcoming Search Engine Land Conferences

Get Your Search Engine Land
Premium Membership!

Become a premium member today and receive:

  • Express commenting privileges & photo.
  • Exclusive videos & newsletters.
  • Discounts to our SMX conferences.
  • Access to "How To" & Other Archives.

Learn More

Upcoming Search Engine Land Conferences
Add to GoogleAdd to My Yahoo!Add to BloglinesAdd to NetvibesAdd to Windows Live