A Case Study: Using Contests To Build Links

It’s common knowledge that certain markets are harder to build links for than others. For the most, part highly competitive industries are tough because they’ve been worked to death, but less competitive markets can also be difficult because of the demographic behind them. Such was the case for a client we took on awhile back in the financial services industry. He sold a very niche product in a very competitive industry, known to be populated by busy corporate executives. He came to us with a new website which needed back links to support ongoing SEO, build his company brand and drive traffic to the site. No small feat considering the market he was in.

After hours researching the industry and finding it filled with “good content”, I knew a standard campaign wouldn’t do. Unless I had President Obama or Alan Greenspan writing my content, no one was going to pay attention to another article or white paper in this market. I needed to create a different and unique splash to attract the attention and links I needed, so I came up with the idea of launching a contest.

My column today is a basic case study of that contest campaign. This was one of the most difficult websites I’ve worked on -not because the site was new or the market competitive, but because the people we needed to target were busy corporate executives.  I knew if I went after these decision makers, I’d probably fail so I changed my angle of entry and created a promotion that appealed not only to the executive, but to the employees of his/her company as well.

And it worked.  Here’s what we did:

The Research

When you’re building links, it’s natural to use tactics you’re comfortable with, so we started our research looking at topically relevant link bait and white papers written in the last year. The idea was to find a trendy topic, hire an industry authority to write a three part series and pimp the content from the client’s site.  It’s a good strategy and usually works, so off we went culling Digg, Delicious and industry media sites like OpenForum and SlingShot for hot topics and ideas we could use.

And boy, did we find them. There is a virtual goldmine of content in the financial service space written by celebrities, experts, academics, bloggers – you name it. Initially, I was excited to find the content and track trending terms, but after a while my excitement waned as I realized what it would take to make waves in this very crowded and very status-conscious crowd. Like I said before, unless I could convince President Obama to write my article series, it was doubtful anything we wrote would be an editorial and viral success.  So we abandoned the content angle, took note of what was not being done, our economic climate and the fact everyone loves something for free and developed the contest campaign instead.

The Process

Since we had a mountain of research data to draw from, developing the contest was fairly easy.  We outlined the contest and added a no-strings-attached giveaway to help the program go viral. From there, we focused on buying memberships into industry associations where our promotion would be targeted to a community of like-minded people.

While these people are like-minded, they are also (for the most part) my client’s competitors,  so I knew I had to approach with caution. I worried about how my client would be perceived, so I staggered the execution of the program and removed any link requirements to participate.

Yes that’s right, they didn’t have to provide the link in order to receive the giveaway or participate in the contest, linking to us was optional. Why? Because building trust with new partners is paramount for future linking opportunities. If no one trusts my brand, no one will link regardless of the incentive offered. I couldn’t afford the risk and decided our first impression was too important to screw up so I suggested they link rather than  make it a requirement to receive the freebies.

Here’s an outline of what we implemented:

  • January 15 – Joined a well known industry Association with membership of 900.
  • February 1 – Sent first  email  introducing company to fellow members. No sales pitch.
  • March 1 – Sent second email with humorous spring season promotion, offered modest discount coupon.  No sales pitch.
  • April 5 – Third email sent, this one outlined the contest, had an opt-out. In addition to showcasing the contest, the email included a substantial discount toward any product my client sold. We made it clear anyone in the company could use the discount and encouraged people to send it to friends and family. There was a six-month expiration date on the discount.
  • May 1 – The contest closed, a winner was picked, prizes awarded. We issued a press release announcing the winner.

The results? 107 people used the discount, 262 people registered for the contest,  52 links from Association members showed up in our back link counts. The membership fee was $575.00 so if do you the math, you’ll see the promotion paid for itself and then some.

The Bottom Line

If you think 52 one-way inbound links isn’t a huge number, keep in mind the goals we set and what this promotion touched on:

  • We secured one-way links from topically relevant sites
  • The promotion went viral
  • Sales were made
  • My client’s brand was exposed to authority leaders in his community
  • The client’s brand made a positive impression within a short time period in a very competitive niche

This contest and the principle behind it will work for any industry, as long as you target a specific group and understand what motivates them. If you’re looking for a new twist or a fresh link building idea, consider hosting a contest.  Everyone’s a winner if you do.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Link Week Column

Sponsored


About The Author: of LinkSpiel.com and Alliance-Link is based in Fairfax Station Virginia and offers link marketing consultations and content partner services.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.solardave.com Dugdale

    Debra,

    Thanks for the case study. Interesting when we get so excited on getting only 52 links in hard niches.

  • http://spanishgringo.blogspot.com spanishgringo

    It is a good idea and I am a big fan.

    However, you should have included the cost of the “substantial discount” in your cost of the link building project. After all that was used as a big hook for the e-mail that was sent out for the contest.

    If they still had a positive gross margin after the discount it gets a bit tricky to properly account for the cost (not from an accounting perspective but from a project ROI perspective) because you have to estimate what you would have sold without the discount. Although tough, a reasonable estimate should be calculated and it should not be ignored in evaluating the project.

  • http://www.ericward.com Eric Ward

    This is a great confirmation that it isn’t about quantity. And there are additional business benefits to this approach that go far beyond the links gained. Relationships have been started, contacts have been made, rapport has begun to be built. Try accomplishing that with 368 random stumbleupon or twitter link drops. Never happen.

    Thanks Debra – less is ALWAYS more with strategy driven link dev

  • http://www.alliance-link.com Debra Mastaler

    Sorry for the delay in responding to comments, I’ve been out of the office this week.

    @spanishgringo The discount wasn’t a “loss leader”, it was designed to show a return. And even if it didn’t, that would have been ok with the client since we approached this from his marketing budget, not sales. I always approach custom link building with balance in mind, to do anything less is a disservice to the client.

    @dugdale – I get excited when I secure one link. ;)

    @Ericward LOL – I’ll take the SU and twitter link drops too but at the end of the day, those 52 links translated into value which is what we’re after eh?

  • Selina Green

    Thanks for your case study, hope it could help me to improve my website http://www.golfcheapclub.com . I had try my best to improve it.

 

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide