Which Is The Most “Generous” Search Engine To Local Businesses?

Earlier this month, one of our customers asked an interesting question in a training workshop. They wanted to know which search engine displayed the most local results for different types of search terms. Google gets the lion’s share of focus in the SEO world, particularly in Local. They also have the most developed local search product (vs. Bing and Yahoo), but does this mean that they present more local results to searchers?

We discussed our own assumptions on this matter and did some digging online but couldn’t find any research that compared the display of results on Google vs. Bing vs. Yahoo. This got our research juices flowing and so we decided to conduct a study ourselves to find out which search engine is the most generous to local businesses.

We decided to expand the study to try and answer 3 specific questions:

    1. Which search engine gives more page 1 space to local businesses?
    2. How does the split of search results vary by keyword type?
    3. How does the split of search results vary for geo-modified vs. non-geo modified keywords?

Research Methodology

We (BrightLocal) conducted the study across three days in early March (2014). We focused solely on US results, using US versions of search engines and US locations.


We looked at three different types of keywords:

  1. Generic (e.g., [plumber])
  2. Service (e.g., [radiator repair])
  3. Long tail (e.g., [emergency 24hr plumber])

And we also looked at geo-modified versions of these terms:

  1. Generic + Location (e.g., [plumber in Phoenix AZ])
  2. Service + Location (e.g., [radiator repair in Phoenix AZ])
  3. Long tail + Location (e.g., [emergency 24hr plumber in Phoenix AZ])


We used three different locations, which we set in our browser settings or using local proxy servers. We picked the three locations based on their population sizes, selecting cities of varying scale:

  • Phoenix, AZ – 1.5m pop (large)
  • Albuquerque, NM – 560k pop (medium)
  • Salt Lake City, UT – 190k pop (small)

Industry Sectors:

We picked seven local industry sectors: plumber, dentist, hairdresser, accountant, attorney, insurance agent and builder.

In total, we used 126 combinations of search terms: 6 search term types x 7 sectors x 3 locations.

Analyzing The Result Types

We ran these same sets of 126 searches across Google, Yahoo and Bing. We then analysed by hand the mix of results returned and categorized them into three Result Types:

  1. Local Results – these are local business listings on Google+, Bing Places or Yahoo Local
  2. Large Websites – results for sites such as Yelp, Wikipedia, DemandForce, government or trade bodies
  3. Local Business Sites – results for websites belonging to a local business/multi-location business

The following charts represent some of the main findings of the study. A full set of charts and analysis can be found on BrightLocal.com.

1. Which Search Engine Gives More Page 1 Space To Local Businesses?

Google vs Bing vs Yahoo - local results %

Chart: Generic Keywords – Percentage of Results by Result Type

Key Findings:

  • Google is most generous — it gives more space to both Local Results (40%) and Local Business Sites (19%)
  • Bing and Yahoo give more space to larger websites (65% and 58%, respectively)


With generic keywords (e.g., Plumber, Accountant), Google gives more space on page 1 to local results. In addition to this, Google hands more space to local business websites, as well. Google obviously believes that local results and local business sites provide the best “answers” and user experiences for these searches.

This is positive news for local business owners; they may not have the scale and domain authority to match larger sites; but, Google gives them greater prominence based on their local relevance.

On the subject of “larger sites,” over the last two to three years, there has been a marked fall in the user volumes of IYPs and directories, so it’s not surprising to find that they get less page 1 real estate. We recently published an updated piece of research which shows a 22% decline in traffic to IYP/directory sites in 2013.

2. How Does The Split Of Search Results Vary By Keyword Type?

Google vs Bing vs Yahoo - split of local  results

Chart: All Search Engines – Percentage of Local Results by Search Engine Type

Key Findings:

  • Google and Yahoo give more prominence to local results than Bing
  • Generic terms deliver the greatest percentage of local results compared with other term types
  • Long-tail terms result in the fewest local results being displayed


Again, Google proves to be the most generous engine. Overall, it displays the greatest percentage of local results on page 1 (although Yahoo returns more local results for long-tail terms).

This puts even more emphasis on Google Places optimization as there is greater traffic and greater chance of appearing prominently for key search terms. Generic terms have the highest volume of searches (more than long-tail, certainly), so there is a lot to be gained by focusing optimization on generic terms and ensuring things such as Category selection in your Places for Business dashboard are done correctly.

3. How Does The Split Of Search Results Vary For Geo-Modified Vs. Non Geo-Modified Keywords?

Google vs Bing vs Yahoo - Geo vs Non-Geo terms

Chart: Local Results – Geo vs.. Non-Geo Keywords

Key Findings:

  • Google returns more local results for keywords that do not contain a geo-modifier
  • Bing/Yahoo show more local results for keywords that do contain a geo-modifier


When a searcher does not use a location term, Google returns more local results than either Bing or Yahoo. There are two likely factors driving this:

  1. Google is more confident in its local product and results than either Bing or Yahoo, so is prepared to give more results for non-geo-specific terms
  2. Google uses other location factors (such as IP address) to determine location, and uses these more aggressively as a factor in determining what results to display

There isn’t any extensive, published analysis of local searcher behaviour and the keywords they use (sounds like a good idea – ahem, BrightLocal research team!). But some recent evidence and discussion (see post by Linda Buquet on Local Search Forum) assumes that most searchers do not add a location term to their search query. This makes Google the more valuable search engine for local businesses, given that it gives more first-page space to local results for non-geo-modified terms.

Focus On Google

Given the size of the shadow that Google casts on our search lives, we thought it would be useful to show the percentage of local results Google displays for all types of terms.

Google - Local Results by Keyword Type

Chart: Google – Percentage of Local Results by Keyword Type

Key Findings:

  • Generic keywords result in highest percentage of local results displayed
  • Long-tail keywords trigger fewest local results


Google displays significantly more local results when a generic term is used over a long-tail search term. Whether a long-tail keyword is used on its own or with a geo-location, it is still the least likely search “type” to trigger local results.

So, Google Places+Local optimization should focus more on generic and service terms. Factors such as correct category selection and providing a list of services are very important to get right.


It appears that Google is fully deserving of the focus that search marketers give it. They have the highest search volumes, best local product and give the greatest share of voice to local businesses.

Of course, we shouldn’t stop using Bing and Yahoo as they also represent good, free marketing channels. But when clients ask, “Why the focus on Google?” Well, now we have another reason to support our actions.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Channel: Local | Local Search Column | Search Marketing: Local Search Marketing | SEO: Local | Stats | Stats: General


About The Author: is Founder & CEO of BrightLocal.com. BrightLocal provides local SEO tools for local businesses; see their research section for the latest findings about the local search market.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.

Comments are closed.


Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide