Google Quick Answer Fail: NSFW Advice On “How To Eat Sushi”

Google continues to expand the number of quick answers it offers in its results, as well as the size of those answers themselves. But since Google takes these answers from other sites without any human review, that can lead to goofs. The latest: some advice on eating sushi that might not go down well with […]

Chat with SearchBot

answers-knowledge-graph-ss-1920

Google continues to expand the number of quick answers it offers in its results, as well as the size of those answers themselves. But since Google takes these answers from other sites without any human review, that can lead to goofs. The latest: some advice on eating sushi that might not go down well with some.

In a search for how to eat sushi, Google provides a four-step direct answer that it has lifted from Vice’s Munchies site:

How To Eat Sushi - Google

Notice the fourth point, which ends with:

That’s like shaking your wanker in public.

For those not familiar, “wanker” is primarily British English slang for penis. OK, actually, for what someone might do with … well, you can read it yourself. And sure, the reference probably isn’t that offensive to many. Not safe for work – NSFW? Heck, maybe it’s even OK there. But the inclusion probably doesn’t make this the best advice on eating sushi that Google could offer.

The bigger issue is why Google even feels it has to offer this much advice on eating sushi. In the old days, Google used to refer people to web sites, when they were looking for advice. One of the advantages to this is that if the advice was going to be written with a particular tone — funny, randy, serious, academic or whatever — that tone might make more sense within the context of the site.

These days, Google just lifts answers off of pages, which not only potentially reducing the chance that the site actually providing the answer doesn’t get traffic but also producing the problem where the context is lost.

In the sushi example above, someone has summarized the steps out of a six-minute video interview with chef Naomichi Yasuda, who does indeed joke with a laugh that shaking is something that should be left to men after using the men’s room, not for soy sauce and sushi. The Munchies site must have assumed including that joke as part of the steps worked for its audience. It might not work for Google’s audience.

The other issue, of course, is that no human being at Google is reviewing all this. It’s all done through an automated process. And what started as short definitions and factual statements that were being provided has turned into more complex step-by-step instructions — and more opportunity for error.

Ironically, today’s embarrassment was spotted by a Googler, Stephen Lau, a software engineer with Google Glass, who tweeted:

For some previous examples, see our story last month, Some Of The Weird Issues When Google’s Quick Answers Come From Random Sources.


Opinions expressed in this article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land. Staff authors are listed here.


About the author

Danny Sullivan
Contributor
Danny Sullivan was a journalist and analyst who covered the digital and search marketing space from 1996 through 2017. He was also a cofounder of Third Door Media, which publishes Search Engine Land and MarTech, and produces the SMX: Search Marketing Expo and MarTech events. He retired from journalism and Third Door Media in June 2017. You can learn more about him on his personal site & blog He can also be found on Facebook and Twitter.

Get the must-read newsletter for search marketers.