The Google Sewage Factory, In Action: The Chocomize Story

Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt has quite famously been on record many times talking about how the web is full of garbage. It’s a cesspool out there, he’s said. Today, a short fast look at how his own company pollutes the web.

Right now, one of the “trending topics” on Google is the word “chocomize,” as you can see here:

A term like “chocomize” will “trend” on Google when there’s a sudden, out-of-the-ordinary spike in searches using it. That’s certainly the case with chocomize, which Google Trends reports as having “volcanic” activity:

What’s going on? Brent Payne wondered and tweeted about it. That caught my eye, so I went exploring.

Chocomize is a web site that lets you create custom chocolate bars. Cool! But why’s it suddenly a popular term today? Fortunately, Google Trends is set to give me the answer. On the page that Google Trends makes about Chocomize, there are news results:

Awesome. Now I can discover what’s happening. The first result gives me this:

Not so awesome. That page explains what Chocomize is but not why it suddenly became popular. And, um, what’s a horror movies site doing reporting about chocolate bars?

Answer? That little arrow, pointing at the Google ads. Chocomize is a popular term, so if you can draw traffic to your page, then you’ll increase the chances of getting clicks on your ads.

That page isn’t adding any value to the web. If it didn’t exist, we wouldn’t be the less savvy about Chocomize. But thanks to Google Trends, we’ve got a big red flag up in front of publishers that wish to pollute Google’s results with this type of garbage.

How about the number two news site listed:

Worse. Now we’ve got ads even more in our face — Google ads, no less — and still no idea why Chocomize is trending.

Remember, these are results from Google News. There’s supposed to be some actual “news” to why these pages should be listed. But again, the only reason this page exists is probably because the publisher saw Chocomize trending and wanted to ride it for some traffic, regardless if chocolate falls outside the typical scope of “TV and Anime Buzz” site that this page is hosted on.

After drilling further into Google News:

And then selecting the “all 16 news articles” link under the first “cluster” of stories to drill further:

The news articles that do appear (5 rather than the 16 promised) reveal what’s behind the term spiking in popularity. The top story on the list is a CNN article about the company that appeared today, probably in conjunction with CNN airing a report. That television presence got people doing searches to find our more about the company.

The pollution within Google News is ridiculous. This is Google, where we’re supposed to have the gold standard of search quality. Instead, we get “news” sites that have been admitted — after meeting specific editorial criteria — just jumping on the Google Trends bandwagon, outranking the actual article causing the term “chocomize” to be popular, polluting the news results and along the way, earning Google some cash.

The situation is worse within the Google Blog Search results that Google also features via Google Trends:

On the one hand, I love Google Trends. It’s fun seeing what the top terms are that are sparking interest. It’s also smart publishers that tap into this type of data.

On the other hand, it’s clear how much garbage that Google has caused to be generated, simply by publishing the trends. But that garbage wouldn’t happen, if it didn’t know it was going to be rewarded. It is, both with traffic from Google and from revenue from Google for those carrying its ads.

It shouldn’t be that hard for Google to police what shows up in response to what it publishes on Google Trends. Spam sites ought to be nabbed. AdSense sites ought to be shut down. News publishers abusing the very lucky position they have of being in Google News, by routinely tapping into Google Trends topics that aren’t relevant to their publications, should get the boot.

How about that as a start to dealing with Schmidt’s web garbage problem? Seems like Google itself has plenty it can do.

Now I’m going to sit back and watch this article rise to the top of Google News. After all, if everyone else is doing it….

Postscript: Here’s some irony. As I expected, Google Trends now shows this story as a news item for Chocomize, as the lower arrow highlights:

But what’s that the top arrow points at? It’s a “news” story about my news story! Here it is:

The arrows point to some of the content that’s been “scraped,” or automatically copied from my post, along with other content gathered from across the web. All of this is to make yet another quality page for “New York News Today” to rank for this term in Google News.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Google: News | Google: SEO | Google: Trends | Top News

Sponsored


About The Author: is a Founding Editor of Search Engine Land. He’s a widely cited authority on search engines and search marketing issues who has covered the space since 1996. Danny also serves as Chief Content Officer for Third Door Media, which publishes Search Engine Land and produces the SMX: Search Marketing Expo conference series. He has a personal blog called Daggle (and keeps his disclosures page there). He can be found on Facebook, Google + and microblogs on Twitter as @dannysullivan.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/ foremski

    I totally agree. But if Google uses humans to penalize sites or prioritize content it won;t be able to claim that the news was selected by algorithm. This would count as “editorializing” and thus might get Google into a position where it has to defend such editorial decisions. It won’t be able to hide behind the algorithm. But clearly, it’s algorithm can’t keep up with the spammers.

  • max

    I agree Google Trends is assisting publishers who put out garbage in order to make money from ads. But, really if you think about it, this is what goes on in the mainstream media every day as well. The media knows what sensational topics are, like shark attacks and hurricanes for instance, and they blatantly switch gears to another story if it’s more likely to get viewers. Sure, everyone wants to know about Anna Nichole Smith until someone get’s their leg bitten off by a shark somewhere. It’s as though the media executives keep an updated top ten list of most sensational general subject matters and base their entire news reporting efforts around them. Their bottom line is making money and selling ads. Hot topics get more viewers, more commercial advertising impressions, and generate more money. That’s why skeptics now refer to what used to be principled journalists as the “drive by media”. They’re not digging for new stories based on any principles other than generating advertising revenue. Unfortunately this “money over matter” mentality is driving 99% of all media today, and it’s the same thing as web publishers using the Google Trends top ten list to generate garbage “news”. Sorry to say, the symbiotic relationship between news and consumerism is here to stay unless our society’s values change (for the better).

  • Peter

    But you didn’t click on an Adsense link, Danny ;)

    Given Google have argued that Adsense IS content, they may say that this problem is caused by their advertisers on the content network not being on the ball.

  • sillystupidman

    I know this is an old article, but I feel like responding anyway.

    Frankly, I fail to see how this is Google polluting the web. It seems like you’re postulating that Google is encouraging sites that use AdSense to write about topics that are trending in order for Google to make more money, but I don’t see any evidence presented here indicating so.

    The way I’m understanding the situation, it’s more or less what max said earlier. Sites publish articles about whatever is trending in the hopes of getting more ad revenue, regardless of whether or not it fits with the site’s intended goals. It just so happens that these sites are using AdSense. Quite honestly, I don’t see how it’s Google’s fault that these sites are choosing to devalue themselves in the hopes of more revenue, and I don’t see how this is newsworthy or shocking in the least.

    Now, if you’re arguing that Google News prioritizes pages which are using AdSense, you may have something interesting, but I don’t see any real evidence of that here.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide