Mar 4, 2009 at 1:12pm ET by Greg Sterling
One of the requirements of class-action lawsuits is notification of potential class members. Most of the members of a class never know that a lawsuit has taken place on their behalf (e.g., bank X credit card holders). So the courts require attorneys to tell class members of the suit and settlement terms and allow them to opt out of the settlement if they desire. If they fail to opt out typically they’re bound by the terms and cannot sue independently.
Google is now in this position with the settlement of the Google Book Search Copyright Class Action lawsuit against its book scanning project. As part of the settlement, Google has set up a $125 million fund to settle claims, which is discussed on this dedicated website constructed to report the settlement terms and related rules.
To satisfy the notification requirements, in addition to the settlement website, Google has used a variety of methods to communicate with potential claimants. According to an article in the NY Times, it has used direct mail but it also plans to spend millions ($7 -$8 million) on newspaper and print magazine advertising to alert copyright holders about the settlement. The scope of all this is global — hence the price tag.
I would be remiss if I were not to point out the partial irony here: Google using traditional advertising to promote an online initiative. But the Internet, especially outside the West, still arguably doesn’t have the same reach as traditional media, which are thus critical to communicate with copyright holders, authors and publishers. (As an aside, if newspapers in certain US cities disappear it will be difficult to find a judicially acceptable alternative notification mechanism — perhaps a combination of TV, Internet and direct mail.)
The way the Book Settlement ad spend is apparently being distributed, according to the Times’ article, is 30 percent US, 30 percent “industrialized countries” and 40 percent “rest of world.” This apparently reflects the regional contribution of books to the global library.
Share, Bookmark & Discuss This Article
More:
Keep Updated: News Via Email | News Via RSS Feed | News Via Twitter
See more stories like this in the Members Library! Check out the Google: Blog Search, Google: Critics, Google: Legal sections of the Members Library where this story is filed. Members also get access to exclusive video content, a members-only weekly & monthly newsletter, plus more. Check out all the benefits!
TOP STORIES
SEARCH NEWS BRIEFS
FEATURES & ANALYSIS
RECENT COMMENTS
SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update:
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
SMX Web Site » | SMX Difference » | SMX News »
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Featured sites from our Blogroll
Become a premium member today and receive:
Ironic? Not at all. Google used traditional media to publicize an important message. All companies should use all the tools at their disposal. Besides Google’s track record at entering new medias like radio and print, many people simply do not view email as the high quality communication medium that some of us techies think it is. Other people simply put a higher value on messages they receive through the mail, because there are less of them. Think about how many emails you get every day. Then think about how many letters you receive. Big difference. The only guaranteed way of legally getting someone a message is either to face-to-face deliver it, or send it via the Post Office. Our clients are using integrated campaigns every day to use online mediums to communicate with customers / contacts – but for contacting people who are not in your inner circle, you still need to reach out by mail to be sure they got the message.