New Google Antitrust Offer A “Significant Improvement” Says EU

Google EuropeAfter Google’s competitors loudly complained about the company’s antitrust settlement proposal, which displayed three “rival links” to alternative’ search results, European Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia said it would take new “concessions” for Google to successfully settle its antitrust case with Europe.

Google has now reportedly made those concessions.

Almunia characterized Google’s updated settlement offer, submitted last month, as a “significant improvement.” According to a Reuters report, “Almunia told lawmakers in the European Parliament he believed the new offer made it easier to see Google’s rivals when making an internet search.” He also reiterated his preference for settling the case vs. pushing forward with an adversarial process and fines.

Potentially billions in fines are on the table if Google cannot settle with the EU.

The company has long taken the position that it wants to settle and repeatedly asserted that its original proposal addressed the European Competition Commission’s “four areas of concern.” The main dispute is over Google’s placement of it’s own “vertical” content in search results.

To address that concern Google originally agreed to:

Without saying more about  these additional, new concessions Google General Counsel Kent Walker confirmed to Reuters that Google has “agree[d] to [Europe's] requirements”:

“While competition online is thriving, we’ve made the difficult decision to agree to their requirements in the interests of reaching a settlement,” Walker said.

The earlier “rival links” proposal was criticized by and others as being little more than a symbolic gesture toward competition. It’s implied that Google has offered to make the “rival links” more prominent. However until these additional concessions are known we can’t determine the potential likelihood of settlement.

Unless the new settlement offer’s changes are truly significant it’s unlikely that Google’s competitors will accept them. Almunia apparently can accept the Google settlement proposal over the objections of third parties. He seems politically reluctant to do so however.

Almunia was instrumental in negotiating the initial settlement proposal with Google. Then he appeared to be somewhat surprised and taken aback by the degree of opposition from “the market.”

On the other side of the Atlantic, in yet another antitrust review, it now appears that the US Federal Trade Commission is unlikely to oppose Google’s billion dollar acquisition of social mapping provider Waze.

Postscript: The following is a statement from, attributed to thomas Vinje, Legal Counsel and Spokesman for FairSearch Europe, in response to the report above:

“Until we have seen the details of Google’s proposed remedies, it would be irresponsible to comment on their content and potential for correcting the anti-competitive behaviour identified by the European Commission in May 2012.

“However, for FairSearch Europe it is essential that the remedies install the principle of non-discrimination so that Google applies the same rules to its own services as it does to others when it returns and displays search results.

“FairSearch Europe also looks forward to a deep and broad market test among complainants and key stakeholders as the only way to test the effectiveness of the proposed remedies to restore competition in the online search market.”

Postscript 2: The Guardian is claiming that one of the new concessions is that Google will introduce logos beside the links to alternative content sources.

Related Topics: Channel: Industry | Google | Google: Business Issues | Google: Critics | Google: Legal | Google: Outside US | Legal: Regulation | Top News


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • treb072410

    Great to know! Thanks for sharing the heads up…

  • Durant Imboden

    As a searcher, I don’t see how I’ll benefit from having Google’s already crowded SERPs littered with links to other companies’ search products. It’s like fighting roadside sign pollution by adding more signs.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide