Call it “privacy 2.0.” Last year Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg famously (and incorrectly) said that privacy is no longer a social norm. However one has only to witness the uproar this week over Facebook Messenger and the exposure of phone contacts to see that privacy isn’t dead. In Europe — Spain in particular — privacy is not only not fading away it’s making new inroads against competing interests.
Earlier this year in March we wrote about a new principle being developed in Spain and Europe: “the right to be forgotten.” Specifically a Spanish court is asking Google to remove data about roughly 90 private individuals from its index. For various reasons these people have filed complaints with the Spanish Data Protection Agency asking that information about them be extracted from the index.
Google is fighting the case and these requests; their implications are quite sweeping.
The government of Spain backs the notion of a right to be forgotten. There are also pan-European regulations, along the same lines, that will be introduced later this year according to an article in the New York Times. Quoting Georgetown law professor Franz Werro, the piece discusses how privacy law is going in very different directions in Europe and the US:
[I]n the United States, Mr. Werro said, courts have consistently found that the right to publish the truth about someone’s past supersedes any right to privacy. Europeans, he said, see things differently: “In Europe you don’t have the right to say anything about anybody, even if it is true.”
Also cited in the article are the results of an EU poll that shows most Europeans support the concept of a “right to be forgotten”:
Three out of four [Europeans] said they were worried about how Internet companies used their information and wanted the right to delete personal data at any time. Ninety percent wanted the European Union to take action on the right to be forgotten.
Google’s global privacy counsel Peter Fleischer has blogged at length about why he believes a “right to be forgotten” is misguided. Typically the disputed information is contained in third party sites and publications (e.g., newspaper articles, Wikipedia). Do individuals then have the right to pull those publications’ pages down? What process would balance those competing interests?
I suspect the regulatory and procedural challenges surrounding implementation of a right to be forgotten won’t change any minds in Europe. Spanish and European regulators will likely require removal of personal information from search indexes after some yet-to-be-defined process. We’ll see exactly what that looks like later this year, after the Spanish case proceeds to conclusion and the EU introduces the intended rules.
It’s a safe bet, however, that while privacy remains a strong concern of Americans, even teens and young adults, nothing like a right to be forgotten will make its way over here, given the current state of First Amendment law.
Stock image from Shutterstock, used under license.
- Google Confronting Spain’s “Right To Be Forgotten”
- Spain To Google: Anyone Can Potentially Censor Your Index
- Spanish Want Google To Police Libel On The Internet
- Obscure Belgian Case Threatens To Open Copyright “Pandora’s Box” For Google In Europe
- EU Minister: Google Street View Controversy Shows Need For Uniform Privacy Standards In Europe
- Google Maps Privacy: The Street View & Wifi Scorecard