• Durant Imboden

    If only the British government were as hard on sex traffickers as it is on search engines:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/mar/09/shameful-failure-slavery-trafficking-uk

  • Jeff Preston

    I am surprised that child porn and child sex tour site listings come up in Google when safe search is enabled. Didn’t Google pull out of China because it was the “right thing to do”. I wonder why they fail to act on child sex abuse?

  • http://www.boxmusique.com/ David

    For anyone interested, there is a growing petition against ISP filtering over at: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/51746

  • Charles Floate

    “A new UK-US taskforce is being formed to lead a global alliance with the big players in the industry to stamp out these vile images.”
    Oh, you mean of corporate fatcats who want to sue every1 who torrents something? This is BS.. It’s not to stop porn, it’s so their agenda try to gain more control over the internet and take down sites the Government doesn’t like.

  • james helios

    Thanks David Cameron,
    It should be take strictly about Child Sex when safe search enable. If Google and Bing is not able to give a safe result then they need to change algorithm.

  • http://www.nathanielbailey.co.uk/ Nathaniel Bailey

    “Very likely, what will happen is that in the UK, the search engines — if
    forced to comply — will shift to very protective filtering, where false
    positives will be tolerated and perhaps restored after an appeals
    process. On the upside, perhaps that’s the price the UK will be willing
    to pay for further protection against child porn online.”

    Or maybe Cameron could get our damn police force to get on with some real work and hunt down the dirty f***er’s that are publishing the child porn he seems to be finding all the time!

    On that note, what exactly is Mr Cameron searching for to find child porn so much on google? I have never seen any child porn (or other porn really) when doing my searches!

    So maybe its just that Cameron needs to stop being such a dirty f***er himself when using google lol

    As for telling google to step up in helping more to determine what should be blocked, why doesn’t our UK government stop wasting money on all the illegals they let in, all the over paid politicians, over paid football players, and all the random and bloody pointless wastes of UK tax payers money among other things! Instead of all that, why don’t our UK government put that money into helping google to better detect such things and put some money into ‘Internet Watch Foundation’ so they can get some full time people on the task of reporting these images and sites to get them blocked!

    That’s right, Cameron and him bum chums only want to bitch about stuff like this, not take real action on it! Its far easier for them to push the blame onto others and say its their job to fix it not ours.

    Sorry for the rant, but our UK government and PMs are a real waste of time, money and space when it comes to anything important IMHO!

  • xtopher66

    Well there are prosecutions for sex trafficking in the UK but as the majority of it is intra EU migration for that, 500 million residents is quite hard to police. There isnt a tick box for “sex trafficker” at borders.