Watch Out For These Unsavory Affiliate Tactics

Many affiliates offer an honest additional marketing channel that is necessary for your marketing mix. However, there are affiliates who are looking for ways to beat your system, beat the search system and hide when you try to find them.

Here are specific things you should watch out for:

Direct linking. Direct linking in paid search is where the affiliate copies your ad copy, uses your display url, and then links the traffic through an affiliate URL directly to your website—in essence, hijacking your well thought out search strategy, bumping your own ads out of the listings, and circumventing your affiliate program rules. I covered this activity more specifically in the following articles: Direct Linking Affiliates Nuisance or Real Problem, and Display URL Traffic Tricks Used by Brand Hijackers.

Link cloaking. Link cloaking is a method used to make a long affiliate URL link into a shorter and prettier one—often to the detriment of a brand. For example: becomes Cloaked links look prettier but make it challenging for merchants to identify and monitor their affiliates effectively. You can require that your affiliates either do not engage in link cloaking or you can supply a link cloaking software to your affiliates so that you can detect cloaked links more easily. I covered this activity in greater detail in the following article: Be Careful When Your Affiliates Practice Link Cloaking .

Brand bidding by someone else’s affiliate(s). This is a technique deployed to avoid contractual brand bidding restrictions. Let’s say your affiliate agreement prohibits brand bidding on sponsored search. To get around this restriction, the affiliate will sign up for a competitor’s affiliate program, and then bid on your brand, while promoting the competitor. Typically in this scenario, the affiliate operates multiple websites. It will sign-up one of its sites for your affiliate program, bid on your competitor’s brands, then sign-up the other of its website(s) to the competitor’s affiliate program and bid on your brand. To protect yourself from this activity and empower yourself to take action when discovered be sure to make it clear in your affiliate agreement that the affiliate or any website or business owned or operated by the affiliate is not allowed to bid on your brand.

Evading detection. When an affiliate is engaged in a practice that violates the terms of your affiliate agreement, there is also a good chance that the affiliate has deployed methods to evade detection from you.

This is generally done in one of two ways. The first involves avoiding specific referrers. The affiliate checks the user’s browser referrer (the URL of the website they were visiting before clicking on the affiliate’s ad) and then either accepts or avoids specific referrers. If the referrer matches to the affiliate’s database of “accepted” referrers, the affiliate will direct your visit through its affiliate link. If the referrer is empty (e.g. you typed the destination URL directly into your browser), doesn’t match the “accepted” referrers (e.g. is not Google, Yahoo, or Bing), or is listed by the affiliate as a “bad” referrer (e.g. if you clicked on a link from within a web analytics program), then the affiliate will not direct your traffic through its affiliate link, and instead send you directly to the merchant’s landing page. Thus, it evades detection by preventing you from seeing its affiliate link.

Another technique involves exploiting the user’s browser history. Yes, browsing history can be viewed. All browsers expose information usually to provide the user with navigational features (for example, visited links change from blue to purple). The affiliate exploits these features and checks the user’s browsing history, then determines whether to direct them through its affiliate link or not.

Users who have ever visited a web analytics website, an affiliate monitoring/tracking program, an brand’s official website or an affiliate network website will be evaded. There are several known hacks that affiliates use, such as the CSS history hack which plays on visited links, or exploiting web caching by measuring the time required to access a particular resource and deducing that it’s either in the users cache or not. Mozilla has a fix for some of these browser leaks. Read more about this here: Plugging the CSS History Leak.

To outsmart an affiliate evader, you should cloak your browsing history by using a different browser—for example, use IE if you usually browse using Firefox, clear your history and your cache before clicking through the affiliate’s ad or suspected URL, and do not click from within your analytics program. You can also try this Firefox plug-in (which I have not used): Safe History Plug-In .

There are other bad guy affiliate techniques deployed such as cookie stuffing which I will cover in a future piece. In the meantime, be aware of how your affiliates might be both circumventing your rules and evading detection by you at the same time.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Brand Aid | Channel: Strategy


About The Author: is CEO of The Search Monitor. The Search Monitor is an ad monitoring platform which provides precision intelligence on SEM, SEO, PLAs, Shopping, and Display ads.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Traphic

    With regards to link cloaking, this is a problem for affiliates too, it is often used as a workaround as Google will penalise a site that has mainly outbound affiliate links, such as coupons sites or comparion sites. Now, without link cloaking these sites struggle to stay in the SERPS due to the Google policy against affilate links. I feel affiliate sites need more attention from Google so we can build sites which people like. Alot of us in SEO can often do a better job of optimising than some corporations so should be rewarded for their efforts. True there are always rotten apples, but the majority are trying to build sites with value and not trick the system.

  • Rae Hoffman

    Do you actually DO affiliate marketing or do you just “advise” on it? Because to call link cloaking “unsavory” is ignorant at best. Link cloaking (on an organic website) allows for better search engine optimization efforts, allows affiliates to track the success (or lack thereof) of specific link placements, ad copy and marketing campaigns, allows the affiliate to ensure the merchant is reporting all clicks to the merchant site (works a bit better than simply trusting their counts)… oh, and let’s not forget – is one of the two suggested methods by Google to let them know not to “count” a link (running it through a redirect or using nofollow) for those merchants who utilize affiliate programs as nothing more than a glorified link development campaign. And since “nofollow” depends on the engines to treat it correctly while a redirect is under my full control, I’m going to go with the redirect every time. The rest of your article brings up good points, but the link cloaking section is FUD.

  • Michael Gray

    Bidding on competing brands is a perfectly legitimate tactic. Don’t believe me check out the Dr. Seuss Book, Star Bellied Sneetches. I’d much rather be Sylvester McMonkey McBean than a Sneetch any day of the week.

    Yes I’m 110% serious.

  • Lori Weiman

    Yes Rae and Traphic – Link Cloaking has legitimate uses. This article is specifically an advisory for merchants who are having issues with affiliates purposefully hiding in order to violate the program on paid search. It is not directed toward SEO efforts or toward affiliates with legit and smart tactics like the ones you describe. Thanks for your comments!

  • Moxley

    Hi Lori,

    I have mixed views on this post – on the one hand I think you’ve done an excellent job at detailing some of the more advanced tactics ( I thought myself quite thorough in this area and had no idea about the css visitor hack), I really don’t like way you almost dive in to a post asserting affiliates aren’t to be trusted and are ‘unsavory’. You then proceed to describe some (potentially) genuine tactics as underhand.

    I would hope that a new affilaite manager, perhaps taking over from an experienced AM, wasn’t to read this post and subsequently start trashing affilaite relationships.

    It’s better to build good honest relationships with affilaites and have an open transparent conversion with your affiliates about what they do, than try and catch them out. The software, and methods you’ve mentioned are certainly a good backup for big programs, but it doesn’t replace real realtionship building.


Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide