What The New ICANN Domain Names Mean For Google Rankings & SEO: Nothing

ICANN – the organization in charge of internet domain names – has approved plans that may create hundreds or thousands of new “top level domain names.” I’ve seen some reports already that this will help with search engine optimization. It won’t. It’ll just enrich some new TLD owners at the expense of brands who will now spend even more to fight cybersquatting.

The New Domain Names Are Coming

ICANN is the Internet Corporation For Assigned Names And Numbers, and it oversees the world’s domain name system. In its wisdom, it decided yesterday that the 22 generic top level domain (gTLD) names  we have at the moment — things like .com, .org and .net — aren’t enough. More are needed.

ICANN doesn’t have anything up in its news section or its blog on this yet, but within its press room area, there’s a news release (PDF format) with more details, which in turn leads to a helpful fact sheet (also PDF).

Winners & Losers

For $185,000, businesses or organizations can apply for to run their own gTLD. If Apple, Google or Facebook wanted to have .apple, .google and .facebook names, that now becomes possible. That could be pretty cool for companies that want to have domain names that fully reflect their own brands.

Of course, not everyone will necessarily be granted a top level domain name. Who gets lucky depends on what ICANN decides. Smaller brands — which are brands nonetheless — won’t be able to afford the names. Who gets to have hot generic names like .money or .tickets will be decided, to my understanding, solely by ICANN.

What happens when two companies with the same trademark both decide they want the same top level domain remains to be seen. Who gets to be .giants — the San Francisco Giants baseball team or the New York Giants football team. Maybe they could play each other. And those are the only organizations out there with a claim to the Giants name, right?

Domain Names & SEO

In terms of search engines and SEO, so far, I haven’t seen ICANN itself say anything directly about how the new names might be helpful. But my experience in watching the release of longer 63-character domain names back in in 1999, as well as the release new names in the 2000s such as .biz and .mobi, tells me that others will soon be making all types of SEO claims about the new names.

Bottom line — the new names will almost certainly mean nothing special to search engines. They won’t have any super ranking powers. If you managed to get .money, that doesn’t mean you’ll rank tops for money-related terms any more than people with the existing .travel domains do well for travel — because they don’t.

Go do a search for “travel” now or any popular travel-related term on Google. Count the number of times you see sites coming up with .travel in their domain name. You won’t need more than one hand. You probably one need more than one finger. You probably won’t need any fingers at all.

Search engines like Google and Bing give no particular credit or boost to generic top level domain names in general. They don’t say, “Hmm, .com — that’s more important than .net, give it a boost.” They don’t say “Hmm, .travel, boost any site with that over other travel sites.”

Search engines do use country-specific domain names, when these can be trusted, as a signal for making content tailored to a particular country. Many UK web sites use the .uk domain. It’s a trust worthy signal.

In contrast, many non-Libyan or non-Tuvalu businesses make use of the .ly and .tv domain names intended for those countries. As a result, those are a less-trustworthy signal of whether a site is from those countries. That’s why other signals such as links have to be used.

So the new domain names? Sites will do well with them not because they have a tasty top level domain like “.travel” but because particular sites might get enough links and other signals pointing at them to do well.

In the end, the domain names do present new opportunities for some businesses. A few companies are going to get very rich off of this. Some are going to wonder if they need to buy their names again with all these new spaces to avoid cybersquatting.

But from an SEO perspective, be calm. Having a new name won’t rocket you to success; not having one doesn’t doom to you never being found.

To learn more about SEO and ranking signals, see our guides below:

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | SEO: Domain Names & URLs | Top News


About The Author: is a Founding Editor of Search Engine Land. He’s a widely cited authority on search engines and search marketing issues who has covered the space since 1996. Danny also serves as Chief Content Officer for Third Door Media, which publishes Search Engine Land and produces the SMX: Search Marketing Expo conference series. He has a personal blog called Daggle (and keeps his disclosures page there). He can be found on Facebook, Google + and microblogs on Twitter as @dannysullivan.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://jodypirrello.com/ Jody Pirrello

    I do like how the entire domain name would be reflective of the brand (e.g. shoes.nordstrom), but given how slow the newer TLDs have been to gain mainstream use, I’m not sure how quickly we’ll see them in action.

    If nothing else, it will keep SEOs at those companies busy with all the 301 work they’ll need to do.

  • Tom Costello

    I think you are wrong about top level domains not mattering. I would guess they have mattered since 2003 at Google. By that I mean that, other factors being equal, a site with a .com address will get sigher scores than a site with a .pl, or .info.

    I would also guess that matches in the top level domain will be treated as matches in the domain name, so will have an effect. I.e. http://www.X.com has a match for X, which will be similar to http://www.X. Unless things have changed, X.Y.com is not the same as Y.X.com in terms of ranking. It may be that http://www.X will not be counted as a url match at all, depending on exactly who wrote the code.

  • http://www.alancharlesworth.eu AlanCh

    Hi Danny – agree with your comments overall, and you are dead right about .travel and the other extensions [we call them suffixes this side of the pond] launched at the same time … ie, sunk without trace.

    However, I would remind you that around the globe [ie outside the USA] Google gives searchers the option of ‘local’ or ‘global’ searches. In the UK a site with a .co.uk suffix would rank higher in the first and vica-versa for a .com*. Where will Google place – geographically – a .apple site?

    * For example: my main site sits on a .eu domain – and it is not ranked at all in Google’s ‘UK’ search, yet it tops the ‘global’ search [for my name]. This despite the UK being in the EU !

  • Ian Williams

    I’m keen to see if this leads to a longer-term devaluation of the importance of exact match domain names for brands, outside of the TLD.

  • http://bobaloula bob

    We have noticed Google preferring keyword domains since the Panda update, maybe not for massive terms like travel but certainly for specific smaller terms so I see no reason why keyword TLD’s wouldn’t do the same. If you can afford the $185,000 fee to purchase one then you can afford to be at the top of your particular tree anyway so maybe no change there just a few people making a lot of money.

    Would you gain more revenue from spending $185,000 on a TLD or by increasing your marketing budget by $185,000 I guess is the question?

  • http://www.dlook.com.au/ Geoff

    I see a continuation of a long list of exciting challenges. It will be key for small businesses to have a long term strategy, the vision to plan.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide