Yahoo Tries To Justify Automatic Account Optimization

Three weeks after the latest uproar over its decision to auto-optimize sponsored search accounts, Yahoo has published an explanation under the brassy headline, “The Truth about Account Optimizations.”

As a refresher, earlier this month Yahoo emailed advertisers about its new Terms and Conditions, which says that Yahoo may create ads, edit keywords, and/or optimize the accounts of U.S. advertisers not bound by an Insertion Order. Search marketers were exasperated.

In tonight’s post, Yahoo says the purpose is to help small- and mid-sized advertisers suffering from “performance issues.” They say the program doesn’t involve changing daily spending limits, altering current bids, changing tactical settings (such as Match Types), or deleting any current ads or keywords.

Yahoo says they’ve seen “impressive results” so far. They’ve optimized about 2% of all accounts since June 2008, and created about 20,000 new ads. They say advertisers have accepted 80% of the changes Yahoo has made on their behalf. One advertiser, an Ohio-based ad agency, chimes in with a testimonial that Yahoo’s optimization reduced one client’s cost-per-conversion by 50%.

That sounds all well and good, and it’s a Good Thing that Yahoo is finally talking openly about the news Terms and Conditions. But to be frank, their blog post comes across as condescending at times, and it’s not likely to make their “blogger friends” feel any better. Yahoo’s justification doesn’t address, for example, any of the complaints shared by Jerry Nordstrom on Search Engine Watch. Jerry had an account auto-optimized, and says Yahoo

  • “…picked out the highest volume generic KW’s and created ads around them regardless if we actually offered those services”
  • “…opened our ads full force on the “content” network”
  • “…created ads with dynamic KW insertion and didn’t add a thing to the negative KW list”

In December, Al Scillitani shared his experience of having an account auto-optimized:

“They added a couple of new ads and new campaigns (with new budgets). One of the ads had a promotion code in it. That code expires. Were they going to keep checking when the code expired and then pause the ad or leave it running so people would click and not buy because the promo was over (either way, Yahoo gets paid).”

Ultimately, the main problem with Yahoo’s new Terms and Conditions is the fact that it’s opt-out; you have to ask Yahoo not to make changes to your account. Yahoo spins this by saying the program “is not mandatory” — which could be construed as a stretch of “the truth” that the headline promises. To their credit, Yahoo does offer clear instructions for opting out, but it seems safe to say that most advertisers won’t feel that’s good enough.

Are you a Yahoo Sponsored Search advertiser? Let us know what you think about Yahoo’s explanation in the comments.

Related Topics: Top News | Yahoo: Search Ads


About The Author: is Search Engine Land's Executive News Editor, responsible for overseeing our daily news coverage. His news career includes time spent in TV, radio, and print journalism. His web career continues to include a small number of SEO and social media consulting clients, as well as regular speaking engagements at marketing events around the U.S. He blogs at Small Business Search Marketing and can be found on Twitter at @MattMcGee and/or on Google Plus.


SMX - Search Marketing Expo

SearchCap: Get all the top search stories emailed each day!

Name: Company: Email:

Like This Story? Please Share!

Other ways to share:

Like Our Site? Follow Us!

Search Engine Land on Google+

LinkedIn over 34,000 members
Subscribe to Our Feed! 80,273 subscribers take our RSS feed
 

Comments

7 Comments on Yahoo Tries To Justify Automatic Account Optimization

demib,

I don’t use Yahoo ads anymore and I recommend everyone to stay away too. The terms are just NOT acceptable!



Winooski,

“Ultimately, the main problem with Yahoo’s new Terms and Conditions is the fact that it’s opt-in; you have to ask Yahoo not to make changes to your account.”

Shouldn’t that be “opt-out”? Anything that will only exclude a user from a service if the user takes an action is opt-out:

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/opt_in

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/opt_out



Matt McGee
Matt McGee,

Thx Winooski — I rewrote that sentence about four times in different ways and didn’t change it to opt-out. I’ll go fix it.



experiencemusic,

re: Ultimately, the main problem with Yahoo’s new Terms and Conditions is the fact that it’s opt-in; you have to ask Yahoo not to make changes to your account.

I think you meant to say it is opt-out – where advertisers are automatically enrolled useless a user ‘opts-out’ of the service.



experiencemusic,

It now shows the change. Great article on this new controversial service.



shoppingengineguide,

I can’t believe this service is opt-out. Kind of reminds me of when Google first launched automatic matching and forced advertisers to opt-out of the service. IMO as long as they ask me before the implement anything, they are welcome to “suggest” anything they want if they think it will help my campaigns.

Good follow-up post.



Cvos man,

The sad part about this PPC scandal is that it probably will increase Yahoo’s revenues – but only temporarily.

Each misstep brings them closer to the Microsoft supernova.



Get Our News, Everywhere!

 
  • Advertise With Us
 

Join us at an upcoming SMX event:

Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.

SMX Site » | SMX Difference » | SMX News »


Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Ranking Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide