2014 SEO Playbook: Google Hummingbird, Content & Authority

It’s November, which means it’s time for my annual SEO Playbook for the coming year. Thanks to Google’s Hummingbird, Internet marketers and search engine optimization professionals are thinking a lot about content and authority, as well as what this new algorithm means for keyword relevance and link building.

At the same time, SEOs seem to have a difficult time figuring out what works for Bing. This year, I’m making my playbook a three-parter. Today, I’ll discuss Hummingbird and content strategy. Next month, I’ll dive into on-page and off-page SEO ranking factors.

Let’s dig in.

The Algorithm

Thanks to Google itself and a lot of very smart researchers, we know a lot about Google’s search algorithm. However, Google reveals what it wants search marketers to know and keeps the rest confidential. In reality, everything that happens between submitting a query and seeing the search results is a black box.

input query

What We Know Comes From Three Sources

1. What Google Tells Us

Google wants to be genuinely helpful. It provides lots of honest and valuable information critical to effective SEO. Google’s vision aligns well with good marketing practices, so it’s worth paying attention to its advice. Another reason to listen is that, where once Google preached best practices only to get trounced by manipulative optimization techniques, the search engine has become adept at identifying and punishing websites that spam, manipulate ranking authority, publish low-quality content or otherwise breach Google’s terms of service.

On the flip side — and at the risk of sounding a bit tin hat — assume that anytime a Google spokesperson reveals something about their algorithm or suggests a best practice, it’s done with an agenda in mind.

Google wants to promote the company’s vision of providing certain types of search results and preventing others. While creating an algorithm to yield the best possible results is crucial, Google uses its own form of propaganda to convince companies to create the types of content it wants to feature (in terms of topics, writing quality and crawlability).

Spokespeople are trained and well armed with what they will or will not say. It’s the perfect example of a company whose employees walk into a room with individual ideas and opinions, then walk out parroting only the agreed upon message.

2. Observation

Much of what we know about improving search engine rankings comes from experience and observation. This is why I refer to SEO as a craft: part science and part art. As SEOs, we depend on each other’s positive and negative experiences to discover trends and understand their significance. As an example, understanding what types of content earn the most links or social mentions is less about rigorous testing and more about learning from personal and shared experience.

In the past, much observation was targeted toward beating Google’s organic search algorithm. It resulted in techniques like link wheels, content networks and content spinning. Going forward, observation will be less about trickery and more about best practices. People are looking for answers to questions such as what types of topics work best for B2B or B2C sites, how to make product pages “rank-worthy,” or how to track visitors without hurting SEO.

3. Correlation

Correlation tests are fascinating. Researchers scour Google’s statements about search and observations by SEOs for whatever they can quantify. They’ll go through HTML, social media sites, content patterns and more looking for anything they can isolate and measure.

Organize all the possible signals, gather measurements on hundreds or thousands of data points, compare them to ranking results or site traffic and then publish the results. Even with the obvious caveat, correlation does not guarantee causation, it’s easy to understand why correlation study insights are popular and valuable.

Hummingbird

Let’s look at Hummingbird, Google’s new algorithm. While it affected 90% of search results, Google implemented Hummingbird — an entire replacement of the algorithm — a month before notifying us. No one noticed.

One reason SEOs may not have noticed is because the biggest changes happened to long-tail queries. The long-tail makes up the bulk of search queries; yet, each query is low frequency. Due to low search volume, plus Google’s (not provided) referral string, it’s easy for minor results, on a site-by-site basis, to fly under the radar.

This meshes with what Google says about its new emphasis on matching the meanings of phrases with concepts rather than just matching the individual words in a query to documents.

I think the real reason people didn’t notice Hummingbird coming online is that while it is a totally new algorithm, it mostly matches the old one. When referring to the Google search algorithm, in reality, we mean a collection of formulas. Every year, Google makes hundreds of changes to the algorithm. Imagine these piling up year after year. Some rewrite old sections. Some are entirely new additions. As changes build-up, the entire collection becomes more complex and less optimized.

It makes sense that Google would reorganize all the pieces and combine many formulas to optimize, organize and clear the path for future improvements. Let’s call it housekeeping or spring cleaning. That’s conjecture on my part, but I don’t think it’s a big stretch, especially considering Google makes no algorithm updates without rigorous testing.

Another feature of Hummingbird is to make it easier to add and test future updates to the algorithm. In any environment, one can only test a limited number of things until it becomes too messy to evaluate the results. I’m sure Google has a long list of improvements they want to make, and Hummingbird is designed with that list in mind. Don’t be surprised if Hummingbird helps Google to make future changes more quickly and in greater numbers.

So while Hummingbird adds some new updates — apparently, how well it identifies and handles context — I expect it’s mostly reorganization, optimization and laying the groundwork for future improvements.

Taking Advantage of Today’s Search Engine Algorithms

From an SEO’s point of view, we’re interested in content and authority.

Content

When it comes to content, using concepts, making each concept stand out and employing a four-point content strategy are key.

Use Concepts

The low-hanging fruit is to go through your current content and make sure it uses phrases that match how people think and search. For example, instead of Centurylink – Quick Bill Pay you might want to try Pay Your Centurylink Bill Online. (Centurylink actually has a help page for Pay Your Bill Online; but, you get the idea.)

A lot of sites, especially enterprise websites, use shorthand that emphasizes keywords in titles and headlines, not phrasing. Test more complete titles to see if it increases traffic. Abbreviated phrasing, popular among websites, may become a hindrance to search engines’ growing ability to process natural language.

Make Every Piece Stand On Its Own

Focus each piece of content on a specific concept. A popular SEO content strategy is to write a tent pole page for a key word or phrase, then publish additional content that links to the tent pole page with optimized anchor text. While this can still be effective, be certain each page of supporting content focuses on its own unique concept.

If you’re just writing about the same topic five different ways and linking them all to the tent pole article, trying to get that to rank, you risk making it difficult for search engines to determine the most relevant document.

Using project management as an example, you may have a tent pole page for Project Management Best Practices. While it may be impossible for supporting pages to not overlap, they should have clear separation and stand well on their own. You might include articles like Agile Project Management Basics and Waterfall Project Management Basics.

Don’t support Project Management Best Practices with articles like Project Management 101 or Project Management Basics, as these are essentially the same thing. Before, these separate pages would have targeted different keywords, but now Google knows, or is getting better at knowing, these are essentially the same thing.

As search engines move away from words and phrases to concepts, revisiting the same topic again and again using different keywords becomes less effective. In fact, one has to wonder if this type of strategy will trigger future versions of Panda since it’s not exactly a good user experience.

Employ A Four-Point Content Strategy

When you think of organic search traffic as a secondary benefit created by good content and popularity, it’s easy to see how a four-point content strategy, each with its own objective, makes sense:

SEO Content Plan

SEO Content Plan

While it’d be nice for one-size-fits-all, there may be a fifth or even sixth content area that makes sense for your business.

While many Web businesses perform well with the first three, too many sites lack Education, Information and Resources. These are the areas where sites can target keywords and earn authority while growing awareness and trust. When properly executed, this feeds both SEO and the top of the marketing funnel, which brings us to authority.

Authority

Links continue to reign supreme as the ultimate SEO authority signal. Over the last three years, both search engines and SEO professionals have said a lot about social media authority signals. While social is important and the search engines are moving in this direction, it’s failed to achieve its promise. Google’s speakers seem to have retreated from their initial enthusiasm. It appears things aren’t progressing as well as the search engines would like.

I continue to advocate a strong social media presence on the major sites (Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Twitter and YouTube) that make sense for your business. Participate on smaller networks and niche sites, too, if you can reach target audiences with them. However, do not substitute social media for link building. Keep reaching out to content authors and publishers; ask them to reference and link to your articles and content.  Generate a steady stream of link worthy content.

  • Social Media => Audience Building
  • Relationship Building & Asking => Link Building

Don’t assume Twitter tweets and Facebook likes will result in links. Most social media participants are not content publishers. Depending on your industry or niche, this may or may not include the social media influencers. If the only time your business gets links is when the news media covers your latest product release, should you be so lucky, you will lose the authority battle to your competitors.

You may have heard Google prefers brands and gives authority based on brand mentions in social media. I’m sure Google keeps a vast database of brand names and has a method to identify brands emerging into popularity. But, if you do not get a steady stream of tweets every time you publish a blog article or press release, chances are good your brand is too small or weak to earn significant ranking authority in this way.  I’d categorize this as nice to know then get on with earning readers and links.

Make sure you put an intentional link-building program in place.

Architecture & URLs

At this point, my recommendations for Web architecture look to stay the same into the future. Use a simple, logical architecture, one that looks like an organization chart. Unless yours is a massive enterprise or media site, all pages should be accessible within four clicks from the homepage.

The same goes for URLs; I anticipate no changes. Keep them simple and readable for people. Minimize or eliminate parameters, but if you do use them be consistent in order.

Canonicals

Last summer, Google made a point of saying not to worry about duplicate content. However, Google is not the only search engine out there, so ignore non-canonical issues at your peril. Continue to make sure each page has one unique URL or use canonical directives to indicate the correct URL. If you do use parameters, check your Webmaster Tools setting in both Google and Bing, and keep those parameters in the same order in all your links.

Next month, I’ll review the different search verticals and provide recommendations for them.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: All Things SEO Column | Channel: SEO | Google: Hummingbird | Google: Web Search | Top News

Sponsored


About The Author: operates Schmitz Marketing, an Internet Marketing consultancy helping brands succeed at Inbound Marketing, Social Media and SEO. You can read more from Tom at Hitchhiker's Guide to Traffic.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Hans Schepers

    Great article Tom, thanks. However I don’t understand the relationship between the Hummingbird initiated “shift to concepts” (from a user point of view), and your “four point content strategy” (from a business point of view). Isn’t it all just about the user/visitors here?

  • http://www.adamdince.com/ Adam Dince

    Tom, great article. First SEO piece I’ve read in a long time that hits the nail on the head over and over again. Kudos to you.

  • http://space-wolves-grey.blogspot.co.uk/ Adam

    “Let’s look at Hummingbird, Google’s new algorithm. While it affected 90% of search results, Google implemented Hummingbird — an entire replacement of the algorithm — a month before notifying us. No one noticed.”

    Ah, but people did notice! Perhaps in the UK at least, because we were suddenly served lots of results from Australia and America. Although due to the timing of Hummingbird it was hard to tell if it was the knock on effects of Panda, Penguin, Phantom. But there was plenty of chatter that something was happening.

  • http://www.gmrwebteam.com/ Ajay Prasad

    Thanks Tom for sharing views on Google Hummingbird. The three resources mentioned from Google which we come to know were excellent.

  • http://www.fluxarseo.com/ Alycia Chambers

    Excellent piece on the future of SEO with HUmmingbird. Glad I’m not the only one who finds Bing a bit of a challenge as well.

  • http://www.WebServicesCT.com/ Tim Dugan

    Fantastic Post – I particularly am liking the following:

    > “Use phrases that match how people think and search.”
    > “Don’t assume Twitter tweets and Facebook likes will result in links. Most social media participants are not content publishers.”
    > “Use a simple, logical architecture, one that looks like an organization chart. Unless yours is a massive enterprise or media site, all pages should be accessible within four clicks from the homepage.”

    Great work, thanks!

  • http://www.amire.com.au/ Sean Rooney

    Nice article Tom…spot on!

  • http://computerttricks.blogspot.in/ vishal fulwani

    Great i will read this playbook. and i want to learn about Google’s Hummingbird.

  • http://www.WebServicesCT.com/ Tim Dugan

    Tom, well said – a number of good points here, thanks for the playbook!

  • Bernard Cayeux

    Great, clear article indeed. I like the tent-pole concept and would like to add a not yet confirmed observation of mine. It looks like with the coming of Hummingbird it is better to emphasize on a (key)phrase in the tent pole page and on synonyms in the satellite pages. Has anyone noticed this? Observations welcome.

  • Ria Parish

    Still getting those Australian results being served first page in the UK….

  • Shirish Agarwal

    Authority and Authorship is perhaps google+’s biggest benefits… been using Google’s Social Media network for quite some time and the only benefits i see currently, are in terms of networking.

    There’s all this talk about how plus 1s can help bolster your rankings but so will shares and likes on Facebook and/or twitter. And your time/effort in terms of getting the real return from a Social Media network for your business, i.e building your brand and relationships with your customers is higher on Facebook.

    Im not dismissing Google+, i just think it’s still not ‘there’ yet.

    Wrote http://www.flow20.com/is-google-worth-it/ and i’ll be interested to know what you guys think

  • Jeff Goldstein

    Thank you. Great article.

    -j

  • http://www.coingenesis.com/ ankit mishra

    Tom Your concept is nice, basically you have designed this article for Google
    Hummingbird and content marketing strategy.”Make Every Piece Stand On Its Own” is a good stuff for me, I will remember and work on it,what you you Think what will the next concept of Google in Hummingbird series?

  • Dan Flood

    Tom, great article, thanks! This one point says it all, “think of organic search traffic as a secondary benefit created by good content and popularity”

  • http://www.equilibriumdigital.com.au/ Matt Kelly

    Great article. A really good overview of the current changes.

  • http://www.orseep.com/ OrSeep

    Tom, you did a great job, there are some clear implications and the industry should notice this for the the long tail queries. Google stated that it impacted 90% of search queries.

    Do you think any correlation of schema.org standards toward hummingbird’s release?

  • http://www.orseep.com/ OrSeep

    Tom, you did a great job, there are some clear implications and the industry should notice this for the the long tail queries. Google stated that it impacted 90% of search queries.

    Do you think any correlation of schema.org standards toward hummingbird’s release?

  • swapnil sachdeva

    Your blog post is really appreciable. I would like to mention
    the best thing in the article and the point which confuses me the most.

    Best point mention in your article “One
    reason SEOs may not have noticed is because the biggest changes happened to
    long-tail queries.”

    The point which confuses me the most “As search engines move away from words and
    phrases to concepts, revisiting the same topic again and again using different
    keywords becomes less effective”.

    My Point is getting back link from different keywords/phrases is
    what search engine may take in to account as natural linking or you may want to
    differentiate between getting link from different keywords and key phrases.

  • swapnil sachdeva

    Your blog post is really appreciable. I would like to mention
    the best thing in the article and the point which confuses me the most.

    Best point mention in your article “One
    reason SEOs may not have noticed is because the biggest changes happened to
    long-tail queries.”

    The point which confuses me the most “As search engines move away from words and
    phrases to concepts, revisiting the same topic again and again using different
    keywords becomes less effective”.

    My Point is getting back link from different keywords/phrases is
    what search engine may take in to account as natural linking or you may want to
    differentiate between getting link from different keywords and key phrases.

  • David Lee

    You are not alone. Doing digital strategy research for a global client and we noticed the lack of creative content and design architecture in 60-70% of the websites that are on the first 3-4 SERP of respective countries search engines…

  • David Lee

    You are not alone. Doing digital strategy research for a global client and we noticed the lack of creative content and design architecture in 60-70% of the websites that are on the first 3-4 SERP of respective countries search engines…

  • Richie

    I think Hummingbird has championed the rise of longer-tail and more complex queries being issued–however, strategy shouldn’t be so narrow. Instead, each site has to be an authority for an entire concept or niche, rather than just optimizing narrowly for a keyword.

  • http://www.ipro-software.com/ Andrew Jones

    Very informative though am I in the dark ages, as I would prefer to search via keyword i.e. “Quick Bill Pay” rather than type “Pay Your Centurylink Bill Online” and if I ever did convert to voice I would still think the same. Keywords are short hand, so perfect for search.

  • rhozze

    New Hummingbird, new searching way, it mean we must increase the quality of our site, isn’t is?

    Harga HP Terbaru

  • Shauna Duty

    “Going forward, observation will be less about trickery and more about best practices.” = True, true, true! I related a similar comment in my dental copywriting blog today, and I’m really sensing a trend toward adherence to best practices, ethical SEO, and integrity shaping the future of search ranking success.

 

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide