Did Google Cleverly Upstage Microsoft’s Bing?

Mike Arrington thinks that Google engaged in “a little stealth black ops mission” and blunted the full impact of the Ballmer Bing announcement yesterday by announcing Wave. Whether Wave represents a huge new development in digital communications remains to be seen, but almost every major news outlet had to cover it and divide its attention between Bing and Wave. Indeed, many journalists and bloggers were physically divided between the AllThingsD conference near San Diego and Google’s developer event I/O in San Francisco.

Arrington also cites the lack of access to Bing/Kumo as a PR mistake. But that’s less a function of a PR miscalculation in my understanding than the fact that Ballmer had agreed to appear at the D event and knew that he was going to be probed about Kumo; so Microsoft decided to effectively pre-announce the engine before its public release next week at SMX Advanced. As a practical matter, however, Arrington may be correct: more stories and deeper coverage would have been driven if everybody was able to do what I did and compare Kumo/Bing to Google side by side.

At the press event following the Wave keynote the panel was asked who Google saw as its competition for the product (impliedly Outlook and others). Vic Gundotra, Google Engineering VP, feel back on the position that Google developed the product without any thought to the existing or potential competition. After the close of the session, I was talking to a reporter about Google’s awareness of competitors and its thinking about its competitive positioning. I said I agreed that Google often develops products without thinking about competitors directly.

But I also agree with Arrington that on the PR front Google is more directly engaged in competitive maneuvers. In the same way that before the ill-fated Cuil launch, Google coincidentally announced that its search index had massively increased, undermining one of Cuil’s central PR points and claims against the search incumbent, Google was certainly aware that Bing was going to be announced this week. While the timing of the Google I/O event itself was not scheduled to undermine Bing I’m sure, the Wave announcement was likely calculated to steal some thunder — which it appears to have done.

Arrington discusses in his post the fact that the developer audience cheered throughout the Wave demo yesterday. I was kind of amazed by that myself. There was enthusiastic applause multiple times throughout, much like a political speech is often broken up by cheers or applause. And the decision to give away the HTC Magic/G2 phone to attendees was both a shrewd and practical move that has already paid dividends in Android coverage.

Next week will see the public launch of Bing and a wave of “hands on” stories will be written. As the marketing campaign for Bing rolls out more stories will be written about the campaign itself and whether it’s having an impact and so on. Microsoft will get a good deal more PR and news coverage accordingly. Beyond the so-called search wars there are the “meta-level” PR strategies and wars that mirror the underlying products they’re exposing.

From that standpoint, if the PR goal of Wave was to diminish the focus on the Bing announcement Google appears to have succeeded.

Related Topics: Channel: Industry | Google: APIs | Google: General | Google: Marketing | Google: Other | Microsoft: Bing | Microsoft: Business Issues | Microsoft: General | Top News


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Michael Gray

    not like google has a history of stealing other people’s thunder or anything


  • http://www.solardave.com Dugdale

    Just look at the trending topics on Twitter right now, Wave is at top and bing on the bottom.

  • http://www.keenerliving.com/ Bruce Keener

    Google knows how to compete, and MS needs to anticipate thunder-stealing and do a better job of keeping the thunder themselves. For too long MS has not really had to compete … it had the advantage of a monopoly in its OS, and now has to develop much better competitive skills.

    I have my doubts as to whether Wave will amount to much, but Google did steal the thunder with it yesterday.

  • http://www.planetc1.com/ chiropractic

    If they are stealing thunder, they’re doing a mighty good job of it. Someone at the GoogPlex deserves a pat on the back.

  • http://www.brickmarketing.com nickstamoulis

    Nice mention about Cuil…no one saw that coming with them! :)

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide