Google: 25% Of Queries Are New & Adding Question Engine

Google’s Udi Manber – Search is a Hard Problem from Read/Write Web has an interesting write up on a presentation that Udi Manber, Google’s VP of Engineering, gave the other day at Supernova. In his presentation, he covered why “search is a hard problem.” But a few of his statements really stood out from the others.

Manber said 20 to 25% of the queries that Google sees today have never seen before. Wow, 25% of the queries people enter into Google today, were not seen before today?

Manber also said that Google is rolling out a new search function that interprets questions better. Manber gave three examples of how Google will be handling this.

(1) “How much does it cost for an exhaust system” will pull up results from “cost of an exhaust system.” (2) “Overhead view of bellagio pool” will pull up results from “bellagio pool pictures.” (3) “Fedora 5 losing network connections” will pull up results from “fedora 5 network configuration.”

Postscript From Danny: Google promised this query expansion last month as part of its Searchology event, and Google’s Matt Cutts told me this weekend that it is already live in the service.

Postscript From Barry: That 25% New Queries Figure? Ballpark Estimate, Says Google is the update we just got from Google.

Related Topics: Channel: Strategy | Google: Web Search | Search Features: Query Refinement | Stats: Search Behavior

Sponsored


About The Author: is Search Engine Land's News Editor and owns RustyBrick, a NY based web consulting firm. He also runs Search Engine Roundtable, a popular search blog on very advanced SEM topics. Barry's personal blog is named Cartoon Barry and he can be followed on Twitter here. For more background information on Barry, see his full bio over here.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/blog/mahalo-human-powered-search/ mad4

    I blogged about the 25% of new queries issue at http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/blog/mahalo-human-powered-search/

    If 25% are new then the database of previously searched for terms is growing by about 1.5 billion every single month – on reason human powered search can never keep up.

  • http://www.seroundtable.com rustybrick

    Interesting, I just didn’t think that number was so high.

  • http://www.adapt.com/blog Erica Forrette

    Heh… maybe that “queries that have never been seen before” number is gonna see a little uptick following that recent Googlenope story – I know I entered some garbage searches to try to trick The Google myself!

  • http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ Matt Cutts

    It’s definitely that high. The long tail is very, very long.

  • http://www.seo-theory.com/wordpress/ Michael Martinez

    The 25% figure has been announced previously. It came out in Google’s 2006 press day for sure (Danny blogged about it on SEW) and it was mentioned in the Searchology Press Day this year. I think the other points were also raised by Udi at Searchology.

    Matt, it seems like you’re confirming 6 billion queries a month at Google. If so, the various search engine ranking reports released by HitWise, Nielsen, and comScore are seriously underestimating Google’s activity.

  • http://hamletbatista.com Hamlet Batista

    I coined the term “the invisible long tail” to explain the phenomenon in a Youmoz article a couple of weeks ago. There, I explain a technique I use to identify such terms.

    Identity followed up with a clever strategy to predict such terms through patterns.

  • http://www.marketandmain.com Dennis Ray Nestor Jr.

    I have heard of many people using Google as a spellchecker. Could This be where they are coming from?

  • http://www.nonlinear.ca/blog/ Randy woods

    We’ve spent some time analyzing the AOL data release of late last year and have arrived at similar conclusions. These are described in a series of blog posts but in essence:
    - The top 1% of search phrases = one-third of search volume
    - The top 25% of search phrases = two-thirds of search volume
    - The remaining 75% of search phrases are sought only once in the three month period for which data was released.

  • henochsberg

    In the Sunday,8/5/2007,Washington Post Magazine, Gene Weingarten had a follow-up column to his original Googlenopes column. He mentions a new website, http://googlenope.com, which is a reader contest on these. It’s pretty clever; definitely worth checking out.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide