On November 1st I reached the 19 year mark as a content publicist/link builder. Nineteen years. I won’t bore you with how we went after links back then by rubbing two sticks together and sending up smoke signals. Smoke signal spam was not a big problem yet.

I poke fun at myself but at the same time there are a few things that longevity is quite good for. First, I have seen just about every linking scheme ever created, whether by clients eager to get my opinion of them, by seeing them in a backlink analyses, or by being the recipient of a spam email trying to sell them to me.

Other advantages to linking longevity are being able to watch in real-time over time as the tools and techniques and strategies have changed. Getting to watch the search engines make changes to algorithms to both combat spam and improve result credibility.

Watching entire niche industries sprout up related to links, many of which are brilliant like this one, or downright moronic, (and I won’t link to them here, because there are just way too many).

Links Held Hostage?

With that backdrop, this past month I must admit I learned about a new linking related scam that I truly did not see coming. Links being held hostage.

I pride myself on knowing all things links. On knowing not just the obvious, but the arcane, the linking minutiae from the nooks and crannies that few people think about and which often ultimately help define success for clients.

But for the remainder of this column, I wanted to focus on alerting you to a scam that you may or may not have already been victimized by.

Link Removal Ransom Note

As a result of Google’s directive that webmasters make an effort to remove obviously spammy links (especially if you received the unnatural links warning), there are  companies that are creating link spam networks, putting links to your site on those networks, providing details for how to reach them by e-mail, and then waiting for you to come ask them to remove these obviously spammy links.

The catch? They want you to give them money to take down the links. Links that you never put there in the first place.

In other words, there’s a new link network in town, and your site has taken up residence in that town without you knowing it, and the only way for you to move out is to pay a fee to have the moving company remove you.

That’s a nice metaphor for what really amounts to links held hostage. Link extortion might be a better term.

Regardless, the point here is that as often happens, there are unintended consequences to SEO and linking related actions and search engine efforts to identify spammers. This new niche of having to pay a ransom to have a link removed is just one of them. There are others, just not quite as clever.

But Wait, Can’t Link Disavow Help Save The Links?

Another scenario might be best labeld the “Preemptive Disavow”. What’s a preemptive disavow? It’s where you tell Google you want to disavow links pointing at your site even though they don’t actually point/link to your site. It’s for protection just in case they ever do. While that sounds silly, I’ve been asked that exact question more times than you might imagine.

The logic behind it seems sound. If you know about a spammy site that has linked to other sites in your niche, and you are worried that it might link to you and try to seek a ransom to have that link removed, why not just disavow that site before it has the chance to hold you hostage? Brilliant, right? I’m not so sure.

To me, every minute of time you spend not improving the content experience of your site but instead on cleaning up a perceived link mess that may or may not exist is a waste.

To be clear, I’m not saying that you shouldn’t try to clean up legitimate link messes that you yourself know you created, like when you made that decision to buy 150 exact match anchor text links from that link broker. That’s an obvious problem, and you need to clean it up, or at least try.

If those sites now are demanding a fee, and calling it an “administrative removal fee”, then as much as I think that’s a bogus thing to do, it’s their prerogative to do so. And I’d never pay that fee. I’d disavow a link before I’d pay one red cent to have it removed, because whether you call it extortion or ransom or links held hostage, it’s just wrong.

Though it might have been wrong in the first place to buy those links, don’t financially reward those who sold them to you be giving them still more money to take them down. Disavow them. While you’re in the disavow mode, in your comments section on your disavow file, let Google know about the link ransom scam.

I’m making a plea here to all ethical linkers. Don’t let the link extortionists succeed. Together maybe this is one link scam we can stop before it gets too big to stop, and before unknowing small businesses and less savvy webmasters get taken for a ride.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Link Building | Link Building: General | Link Building: Paid Links | Link Week Column

Sponsored


About The Author: has been creating linking strategies for clients since 1994. Eric publishes the strategic linking advice newsletter LinkMoses Private, and provides linking services, training and consulting via EricWard.com.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://twitter.com/studiumcirclus James Allen

    I’ve had a lot of success disavowing these types of links by simply adding commentary into disavow files telling Google that these sites charge for link removals. Sometimes you inherit a terrible backlink profile from a client who’s been stung by ‘bad’ SEO in the past. There’s no way I’m pulling out of my personal pocket while the client’s ex-agency laughs behind my back at how they pushed these costs onto someone else.

  • John Pirro

    Anyone who has had success disavowing links/sites, what is the turnaround time from Google? I’ve yet to send a request and have been trying to get rid of the links myself, but I’m about ready to send a disavow request for the links that I haven’t gotten responses from.

  • John Pirro

    Anyone who has had success disavowing links/sites, what is the turnaround time from Google? I’ve yet to send a request and have been trying to get rid of the links myself, but I’m about ready to send a disavow request for the links that I haven’t gotten responses from.

  • http://www.facebook.com/marcuscudd Marcus Cudd

    Several of my clients have been contacted directly by similar scams going back to May of this year. This problem is the worst one yet, simply because they use fear very skillfully as a tactic. In one case a client was contacted by a “webmaster” who had built a site but it wasn’t indexed in Google, and claimed that he was owed money for links my client had supposedly added to his site. It doesn’t take much effort to put up a spam blog, add links to it and start harassing website owners for money. There is nothing Google can do to stop them, since they don’t need the site to be indexed to be successful with the scheme. Perhaps Google would be wise to stop penalizing links, or at the very least announce that they aren’t penalizing links, but assigning them positive or neutral value. This makes it much easier to prevent scams like this from taking root.

  • John Pirro

    If you don’t mind me asking, how long did it take to get a response from Google after sending a disavow request? Thanks

  • HackneyMick

    Hi Eric,

    And as always, good to read your stuff.

    Wondering whether you’d noted or followed the article and discussion on back-linking scrapers in SELand on 6 November at:

    http://searchengineland.com/link-tool-review-ahrefs-138676

    And whether you’d care to talk about the “downright moronic” or possibly unscrupulous and spammy use of these tools.

    Without, of course, giving them any link juice.

    Cheers,

    Michael Zerman
    Adelaide, AUSTRALIA

  • http://twitter.com/Etela Etela Ivkovic

    I’m with you on not paying and letting this link scam
    succeed Eric. One of our clients paid for removing links yet the links were
    still not removed. How shameful is that?

  • Yousee

    Those who ask ransom for links to remove, they are indeed cheap. Thanks to Google, they came out with Disavow links.

  • http://twitter.com/studiumcirclus James Allen

    I think it was somewhere in the realms of 3 weeks to just over a month. It wasn’t a direct response either, moreso an acceptance of an action performed through GWMT. We assume our disavow documents are successful if our reconsideration requests which reference them pass through :)

  • Francesco Giubbilini

    Hi,
    No mercy and no money for these web extortionists! And then … who assures me that they really take away?
    However, I believe that Google can do much more to combat spam…
    Thanks,
    bye!

  • http://twitter.com/HenryP Henry Phillips

    I work for a major directory and I have seen evidence of another related possible scam, in which an agency requests link removals “on behalf of” a client.
    When pressed as to why and asked for confirmation direct from that client, they either do not reply or claim that the request was mistaken.
    Either they are incompetently requesting the removal of perfectly good links, or it is a scam attempting to remove links of their clients’ competitors.
    I always challenge this but I can imagine others simply removing the links.

  • http://www.facebook.com/teresha Teresha Aird

    I completely agree that such scammers should the door slammed in their faces. I heard about this roughly a month ago and honestly wasn’t that surprised. There is a “certain type” of webmaster who tends to thrive on just such scams. Unfortunately they often consider themselves to be search engine marketers!

  • http://www.brickmarketing.com/ Nick Stamoulis

    You have to admire the ingenuity of spammers and their ability to make a profit. Links are important for SEO? We’ll I’ll give you a link if you pay me for it! What? My link is hurting you? Well that’s not my problem but tell you what, pay me AGAIN and I’ll take it down. Double ouch.

  • http://twitter.com/gasyoun Marcis Gasuns

    Directories do it, that’s what I’ve heard. Not DMOZ, but smaller fish.

 

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide