Scroogle’s Gone? Here’s Who Still Offers Private Searching

online-privacyYou’ve probably read the news already that Scroogle is gone forever. It launched back in 2003 and was popular among searchers who wanted to get Google search results in a private setting.

Now that it’s gone, where can searchers go for a more private search experience than Google and Bing offer by default? Here’s a list of a few alternatives. Note that different search engines below make different privacy-related claims; I haven’t investigated them in detail — i.e., by examining cookies, etc. — so anyone looking for a private search experience should do his/her own research.

Private Search Engine Options


Probably no altrernative search engine has hung its hat more solidly on the privacy issue than DuckDuckGo. In early 2011, it made a splash with the launch of, a website that illustrates how Google tracks searchers (and how DuckDuckGo doesn’t).

DuckDuckGo’s privacy page is very clear: DuckDuckGo does not collect or share personal information.

People are noticing, too. Last year, DuckDuckGo was included on TIME magazine’s list of the best websites of 2011. Earlier this month, DDG set a new record with its first million-search day.


Ixquick has long advertised itself as “the world’s most private search engine.” Its privacy policy says that user IP addresses are not recorded and only sends one cookie to users’ computers — a preferences cookie that expires after 90 days. It does, however, collect and store “limited” user information — the date and time of a search, as well as the browser and platform used for the search.

Last October, Ixquick announced that it was making SSL encryption the default on all searches.

The same company also operates Startpage, which looks like the closest mirror of what Scroogle previously offered. Startpage takes a search query, removes all identifiable information about the searcher, and submits the search to Google anonymously. “Your IP address is never recorded, your visit is not logged, and no tracking cookies are placed on your browser,” Startpage’s home page explains.


Yippy is a “family friendly” portal site with a search engine that came from its 2010 purchase of Clusty.

On its About page, Yippy says “We won’t track your activity on our platform, store your history in our browser, monitor or record your searches, store copies of your email, or collect any more personal information than you volunteer. We also won’t sell your personal information to advertisers for profit.”

Yippy’s Privacy page adds that international users (i.e., outside the U.S.) “are subject to forms of minimal tracking depending as required on the country from which they originate.”

ask’s “Ask Eraser”

Although it’s shifting away from pure search to its Q&A roots, continues to offer its Ask Eraser tool to searchers on and

Ask Eraser can be turned in’s settings, which explains the tool this way:

When AskEraser is enabled your search activity will be deleted from (not third-party) servers, except in rare circumstances described in the AskEraser FAQ. You can learn about the third-party partners who receive your search activity here.

Those “rare circumstances” include when Ask is asked to retain search activity data by law or government officials, or if the data is needed to “solve a critical technical issue.”

Google Logo - StockGoogle Encrypted Search

Ironically, one of the post-Scroogle options is Google itself, via Google Encrypted Search. While searches here are secure, it doesn’t actually solve the issue that Scroogle (and some of the sites mentioned above) addressed: Even when you’re using Google’s encrypted search, Google will know who you are (if you’re logged in to a Google account) and will still save your search activity if you’ve enabled the search history feature.

So, while it is a secure search option, it’s not private in the sense that the sites above claim to be private.

I should add, too, that you don’t have to visit the link above for Google’s encrypted search; in October, Google began encrypting all searches when users are logged in to a Google account.

If you think we missed any private search options, let us know in the comments!

Related Topics: Ask: Web Search | Channel: Consumer | DuckDuckGo | Features: General | Google: Privacy | Google: Web Search | Legal: Privacy | Search Engines: IxQuick & Startpage | Top News


About The Author: is Editor-In-Chief of Search Engine Land. His news career includes time spent in TV, radio, and print journalism. His web career continues to include a small number of SEO and social media consulting clients, as well as regular speaking engagements at marketing events around the U.S. He recently launched a site dedicated to Google Glass called Glass Almanac and also blogs at Small Business Search Marketing. Matt can be found on Twitter at @MattMcGee and/or on Google Plus. You can read Matt's disclosures on his personal blog.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Louise Vine

    Google Chrome’s incognito mode/window too?

  • Arthur Weiss

    What about as a search engine. I’ve tried it a few times and the results were OK. It promises complete privacy – no ip address following, no cookies, etc.


    An additional alternative private search option: (p2p web search)

  • Jonathan Hochman

    Set your browser to block cookies, and don’t login to Google, Facebook or any other site. That pretty much gives you decent privacy on the net. If you really want to be paranoid, run your searches via an anonymizing proxy such as

    I see no reason to trust Daniel Brandt (owner of Scroogle) to respect privacy more than Google. Brandt has published websites to “out” (dox) people he perceives to be his enemies.

    At least Google attempts to filter malware, phishing sites and other scum from their search results. Using a minor search engine could expose a user to all sorts of additional risks.

  • MAS

    an additional alternative private search option:

  • S.M.

    Looks Like Scroogle still works on with 1 (o) instead of two…. Hmmmmm. ;)

  • S.M.

    I liked Scroogle, but actually love Gibiru Uncensored News and Image Searches better. It is more user riendly. Have to deal with Ads, but is is more professional….

  • akyyyy

    ive just started to use getting many more results than google gives to me.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide