Back in the mid-to-late 1990s, the most powerful person in search was arguably Yahoo’s Srinija Srinivasan. If Yahoo’s was the “gateway” to the web in the way some think Google is today, Srinivasan was the chief gatekeeper. And now after 15 years, she’s leaving Yahoo.
Srinivasan was Yahoo’s “Ontological Yahoo,” among other titles including being a vice president and editor-in-chief. She was Yahoo’s fifth employee, hired in 1995 to help organize Yahoo’s listing service.
That’s all Yahoo was at the time, a listing service. Human editors — “web surfers” as Yahoo called them — organized web sites by category, into what’s known as a directory. It was something that Yahoo cofounders Jerry Yang and David Filo had been doing themselves, with no particular view on how to structure the information. Srinivasan — “Ninj” as she’s known to friends and coworkers — was brought in to provide structure.
Yahoo’s Former Power
Today, as I mentioned, there are some who argue that Google is a giant gatekeeper that can make or break businesses (see The New York Times Algorithm & Why It Needs Government Regulation). But in the latter half of the 1990s, this was the argument made about Yahoo.
In 1998, I wrote an entire special report about Yahoo and the challenges it faced with webmasters complaining that they couldn’t get listed, in which Srinivasan was quoted extensively. It was a hot topic and continued to be so for years. Site owners would get frustrated that submissions sometimes seemed to go into a black hole, never to appear. Or, if they were listed, a Yahoo editor might alter their carefully worded description — which might mean they’d not show up at all, in response to some keyword searches.
Occasionally, there was even talk of regulating Yahoo.
When Humans Edited The Web
Srinivasan oversaw this entire process. Where Google later has its PageRank algorithm and computer “spiders” that automatically crawled billions of pages across the web, Yahoo had Srinivasan and an army of human editors who hand-organized the web.
And it worked. It worked better than any of the other “automated” or “crawler-based” search engines at the time, such as AltaVista, Infoseek, Lycos or Excite. That’s because the ranking algorithms for these crawlers simply didn’t keep up with the number of pages they were including. They gathered more and more “hay,” if you will, without a ranking system that pulled all the needles to the tops of their haystacks.
Yahoo, in contrast, wasn’t about the sheer volume of content. It was about listing the best of the web. That helped it stand well above the other players in popularity, in my belief, because it was well above them in relevancy.
In fact, Yahoo sparked a number of human-based imitators. The Open Directory. LookSmart. Snap. In fact, in 1999, I was even quoted as saying that year was the year the human-powered directories had won. And they had. For the first time, more search engines were “powered” by human results than crawler-based ones, as this good News.com piece from the time explains.
Crawler-Based Search Engines Make Comeback
It was a short-lived win, however. Google lead a resurgence in crawler-based listings. Google’s ranking system gave you the best of both worlds.Yahoo was a card-catalog of the web, letting you effectively search for the right “books” based on what they were titled. Google’s system let you search through all the pages of all the books in the entire library. It was far more comprehensive, plus it still managed to get good stuff to the top of the list.
The directories were doomed and began dying. Today, none of the major search engines out there are powered by human results. The Yahoo Directory still exists, but you have to hunt to find it at Yahoo. Do a search, and there’s not even a reference to some of Yahoo’s directory categories, as there once was.
But make no mistake. While Yahoo’s no longer the search powerhouse it was (see A Search Eulogy For Yahoo and Revisionist History: Bartz Claims Yahoo Was Never A Search Engine), Srinivasan played a huge role in the search story that we take for granted today.
Srinivasan announced her departure, her “graduation” as she calls it, on the official Yahoo blog today. She reflects a bit on how things began and that she’ll be spending her time now chairing the board of SFJAZZ. The post also includes this departure video from her:
All the best, Ninj.
Postscript: Also announced today, another big Yahoo departure. See Tim Mayer, Who Worked For Practically Every Search Engine, Leaves Yahoo.
Related Topics: Features: General | Stats: History | Top News | Yahoo: Directory | Yahoo: Employees








Danny:
As you know there are still NUMEROUS directories (often in a hierarchical structure and also edited by humans) that are still available that do a great job. While versus the entire web they are small, they still have a focus where quality trumps quantity. In many cases, these directories (that are also searchable) are also non-commercial in nature. Here are a few favorites.
1) IPL2 (A Merger Between the Internet Public Library and Librarians’ Index to the Internet
http://www.ipl2.org
The collection policy of what they will and will not add:
http://ipl.org/div/about/colpol.html
2) globalEDGE
http://globaledge.msu.edu
Numerous international business resources that includes this directory:
http://globaledge.msu.edu/resourcedesk/
3) InfoMine, from the University of California, Riverside
http://globaledge.msu.edu/resourcedesk/
4) Intute from the UK
http://www.intute.ac.uk
Though funding is an issue at the moment, the directory is looking for new sources and the entries are top-notch. Not to mention the excellent Virtual Training Suite of resources.
http://www.vts.intute.ac.uk/
5) Educational Video: WatchKnow
http://www.watchknow.org/
From Larry Sanger (Co-Founder of the Wikipedia) and a team of volunteers and experts reviewing open web video from educational material. Numerous ways to browse, search, and focus. Note the “drill down” categories on the left side of page.
6) State and Local Government (USA) on the Net
http://www.statelocalgov.net/
Again, another collection policy.
http://www.statelocalgov.net/statefaq.cfm
7) MedlinePlus
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/all_healthtopics.html
This service offers NUMEROUS resources but for now a focus on the “Topic” collection where experts from the National Library of Medicine review what they place in each section. New material is added daily. Note the cross-references between what some might call a topic and the approved heading.
8) Teachers Domain
http://www.teachersdomains.org
Browse hierarchy (left side of page) then find materials of interest. Video clips from public television, lesson plans, etc. that can be used for discussion or the actual lesson.
Here’s one section of narrative writing resources:
http://www.teachersdomain.org/collection/k12/la.ws.process.narrative/
9) The Riley Guide
Career and Employment Directory
http://www.rileyguide.com/
10) Perry-Castañeda Library Map Collection from U. of Texas at Austin
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/
11) The Online Books Page
Search or browse various ways. The new book listings are also available via RSS.
http://digital.library.upenn.edu/books/
Browse:
http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/lists.html
and new entries
http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/new.html
12) Film, Moving Images
http://www.movingimagesource.us/research
That’s just a few. We could go on indefinitely. (-:
Next time, perhaps a few of the many services that allow you to chat (email, phone) with experts either 24x7x365 or close to it for real time or near real time Q&A. Almost all of them are free. For example, if you live in Colorado and have a library card, they offer AskColorado, a 24x7x365 service that let’s you chat one on one with someone who can not only help with web resources but also search with you or alert you to resources the library subscribes to and you can access from home, office or any web computer for personal use.